Skip to main content

Delimiting Performance Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Incompetency and Competency Training

Abstract

Conventional correlational analysis and conventional null hypothesis statistical testing (NHST) (e.g., multiple regression analysis including structural equation modeling) assume symmetrical relationships between the independent variables and a dependent variable (Fiss, 2011; Ragin, 2006b, 2008a; Woodside, 2013). The conventional methods represent a “net effects” estimation approach to research (Ragin, 2006b). This means that if the researcher using traditional statistical analysis models a high performance outcome (e.g. the ability to develop product innovations) then the inverse (namely the inability for inventors to successfully develop innovations) results from the same causes, except that the sign of the coefficients change (Fiss, 2011). Net-effects thinking is problematic since significant correlations among the independent variables almost always occur in studies with high numbers of variables (e.g. 10 or more).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawande, A. (2009). The checklist manifesto. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2010). Amazon exclusive: Malcolm Gladwell reviews The Checklist Manifesto. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Checklist-Manifesto-How-Things-Right/dp/0805091742/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1362928191&sr=11&keywords=Checklist+Manifesto

  • Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2009). Fast and frugal forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 25(4), 760–772. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.05.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S. J., & Fairweather, J. R. (2010). The socio-technical networks of technology users’ innovation in New Zealand: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Canterbury: Lincoln University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10182/3339.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9(5), 331–339. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado, A. M., & Woodside, A. G. (2013). Causal recipes of firm self-regulation via adoption of international produce certification standards. Alajuela: INCAE Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2006a). How case-orientated research challenges variable-orientated research. Comparative Social Research, 16, 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2006b). The limitations of net-effect thinking. In B. Rihoux & H. Grimm (Eds.), Innovative comparative methods for policy analysis. Beyond the quantitative-qualitative divide (pp. 13–41). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2006c). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2008a). Online tutorial: Qualitative comparative analysis and fuzzy sets. Retrieved from http://www.fsqca.com

  • Ragin, C. C. (2008c). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In C. C. Ragin (Ed.), Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond (pp. 190–212). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling of adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66, 463–472. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipple, A., & Gawande, A. (2010). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 34(1), 76–77. doi:10.2975/34.1.2010.74-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woodside, A., de Villiers, R., Marshall, R. (2016). Delimiting Performance Outcomes. In: Incompetency and Competency Training. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39108-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics