Abstract
The use of social network analysis (SNA) becomes popular in social science research in the recent years. It is a practical application because it helps organizations to have better conceptualized and new understandings of the interactions. It could help organizations interpret and understand complexity, systems, pattern of changes, and structure of interactions. Moreover, SNA applications have been applied in many complicated fields to identify knowledge leaders in organizations, measure collaboration of teams, illustrate the hidden patterns of structure, and exploring the paths of interactions. In addition, many software programs were developed for personal or limited distribution by mathematicians, sociologists, graph theorists, and information technology specialists enabling SNA to facilitate the analysis of data and the creation of sociograms easier than before. Applying SNA in organizations could benefit many internal activities. It could help organizations to identify the group of experts for technology roadmapping (TRM) or R&D related activities, to know who the most appropriate expert for future collaboration may be, and to see the pattern of the interactions for future R&D planning. This chapter proposes an analysis of smart roofing using SNA to identify the group of experts, the interactions among experts, and the patterns of these interactions to help researchers to gain a better understanding of the current situation of smart roofing research and development programs and also to help them to prepare related future plans in order to promote the progress of smart roofing research and development programs.
Keywords
- Social network analysis
- SNA
- Practical approach
- The application of SNA
- The use of SNA
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options






















References
Borgatti, S. P. (2005) Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27(1), 55–71.
Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social networks, 19(3), 243–269.
Daim, T. U., & Oliver, T. (2008). Implementing technology roadmap process in the energy services sector: A case study of a government agency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(5), 687–720.
Durland, M. M., & Fredericks, K. A. (2005). An introduction to social network analysis. New Directions for Evaluation, 2005(107), 5–13.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215–239.
Fritsch, M., & Kauffeld-Mon, M. (2010). The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: An application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), 21–38.
Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005) Introduction to social network methods (pp. 1–115).
Hansen, D. L. (2009). Do you know the way to SNA? A process model for analyzing and visualizing social media data. University of Maryland Tech Report: HCIL-2009-17, pp. 1–10.
Huisman, M., & Van Duijn, M. A. J. (2005). Software for social network analysis. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, 270–316.
Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network analysis, Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences (pp. 7–28).
Krause, J., Croft, D. P., & James R. (2007) Social network theory in the behavioral sciences: potential applications. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 15–27.
Müller, M. O., Groesser, S. N., & Ulli-Bee, S. (2012). How do we know who to include in collaborative research? Toward a method for the identification of experts. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(2), 495–502.
Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of information Science, 28(6), 441–453.
Scott, J. (1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22(1), 109–127.
Staab, S. (2005). Social networks applied. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 20(1), 80–93.
Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (1988). Structural analysis in the social sciences 2, social structures: A network approach (pp. 62–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wetherell, C., Plakans, A., & Wellman, B. (1994). Social networks, kinship, and community in Eastern Europe. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 24, 639–663.
White, H. D. (2000). Toward ego-centered citation analysis. In B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge (pp. 475–496). Information Today, Medford: NJ.
Yang, K.-W., & Huh, S.-Y. (2008). Automatic expert identification using a text categorization technique in knowledge management systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(2), 1445–1455.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daim, T.U., Khammuang, M., Garces, E. (2016). The Application of Social Network Analysis: Case of Smart Roofing. In: Daim, T., Chiavetta, D., Porter, A., Saritas, O. (eds) Anticipating Future Innovation Pathways Through Large Data Analysis. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39056-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39056-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39054-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39056-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)
