Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rethinking Educational Spaces in School Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education, Space and Urban Planning

Abstract

Approaches to 21st century school design in the United States fall into five realms of concern: Equity, Security, Community, Creativity, and Empowerment. Each of these realms incorporates different methods of assessing the value that design strategies contribute to educational outcomes. Schools have begun to rethink the role of educational spaces in student physical health, psychological wellbeing, and behavior, as well as how the school campus can become a tool for learning. Despite this, the school building, in its form and structure, remains surprisingly similar to those built during the prior century. As architects, planners, and other design professionals face mounting pressures to create new school designs that contribute to the educational return on investment (ROI), they are faced with the challenges of designing in an educational landscape shifting from the impact of disruptive technologies, on a world with depleting natural resources, and amidst an increasingly globalized economy where students must be prepared to work and live.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. doi:10.1037/a0021017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astor, R. A., & Meyer, H. A. (2001). The conceptualization of violence-prone school subcontexts: Is the sum of the parts greater than the whole? Urban Education, 36(3), 374–399. doi:10.1177/0042085901363004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology; concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, N., & Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K. (2006). Environmental comfort in school buildings: A case study of awareness and participation of users. Environment and Behavior, 38(2), 155–172. doi:10.1177/0013916505275307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. A. (2002). Healthy school environment and enhanced educational performance: The case of Charles young elementary school Washington, DC. Carpet and Rug Institute. https://216.197.120.146/documents/scientific_resources/020112_Charles_Young.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2014.

  • Braza, M., Shoemaker, W., & Seeley, A. (2004). Neighborhood design and rates of walking and biking to elementary school in 34 California communities. American Journal of Health Promotion, 19(2), 128–136. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-19.2.128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brink, L., & Yost, B. (2004). Transforming inner-city school grounds: Lessons from learning landscapes. Children, Youth and Environments, 14(1), 209–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullivant, L. (2007). 4dsocial: Interactive design environments. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2008). School. London: Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalition for Healthier Schools. (2013). Toward healthy schools 2015: Progress on America’s environmental health crisis for children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earthman, G. I. (2002). School facility conditions and student academic achievement. UCLA’s Institute for Democracy, Education, & Access. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5sw56439#page-3. Accessed March 1, 2014.

  • Everett Jones, S., Brener, N. D., & McManus, T. (2003). Prevalence of school policies, programs, and facilities that promote a healthy physical school environment. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1570–1575. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311. doi:10.1080/0141192042000195236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fram, S. M., & Dickmann, E. M. (2012). How the school built environment exacerbates bullying and peer harassment. Children, Youth and Environments, 22(1), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gislason, N. (2007). Placing education: The school as architectural space. Paideusis, 16(3), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. E. (2010). Green Schools as high performance learning facilities. National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED512700.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2014.

  • Heschong, L. (2003). Windows and classrooms: A study of student performance and the indoor environment. California Energy Commission. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.408.790&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed March 1, 2014.

  • Heschong, L., & Mahone, D. (1999). Daylighting in schools: An investigation into the relationships between daylighting and human performance. Pacific Gas and Electric Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005). The impact of school environments: A literature review. The Centre for Learning and Teaching, School of Education, Communication and Language Science, University of Newcastle. http://www.ncl.ac.uk/cflat/news/DCReport.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2014.

  • Johnson, S. L., Burke, J. G., & Gielen, A. C. (2012). Urban students’ perceptions of the school environment’s influence on school violence. Children & Schools, 34(2), 92–102. doi:10.1093/cs/cds016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kats, G. (2006). Greening America’s Schools. Washington, DC: Capital E. https://www.math.unl.edu/~pradu3/TeachingUNL/Fall08/398MitC/pub_Greening_Americas_Schools.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2014.

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., O’Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2008). Association between physical environment of secondary schools and student problem behavior: A national study, 2000–2003. Environment and Behavior, 40(4), 455–486. doi:10.1177/0013916506293987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lercher, P., Evans, G. W., & Meis, M. (2003). Ambient noise and cognitive processes among primary schoolchildren. Environment and Behavior, 35(6), 725–735. doi:10.1177/0013916503256260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, P. C. (2010). Evidence-based design of elementary and secondary schools. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka, R. H. (2008). High school landscapes and student performance. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/61641. Accessed March 2, 2014.

  • Moore, R. C., & Cooper Marcus, C. (2011). Healthy planet, healthy children: Designing nature into the daily spaces of children. In S. R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, & M. Mador (Eds.), Biophilic design: The theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, W., & Streb, M. (2001). Building citizenship: How student voice in service-learning develops civic values. Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 154–169. doi:10.1111/0038-4941.00014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, P., Fielding, R., & Lackney, J. A. (2009). The language of school design: Design patterns for 21st century schools. Minneapolis, MN: DesignShare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (2000). Acoustical barriers to learning: Children at risk in every classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 356–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas, M. H., & Bailey, G. B. (1996). Analysis of the performance of students in daylit schools. In Proceedings of the National Passive Solar Conference (Vol. 21, pp. 132–137). American Solar Energy Society Inc. http://www.viva-lite.in/tl_files/downloads/davlit_schools_student_performance.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2014.

  • O’Donnell Wicklund, P., Peterson, A. I., Furniture, V. S., & Design, B. M. (2010). The third teacher: 79 ways you can use design to transform teaching & learning. New York: Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. New York: Marlowe, distributed by Publishers Group West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisha, B., & Coyne, P. (2001). Smart From the start: The promise of Universal Design for Learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 197–203. doi:10.1177/074193250102200402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. (2007). Theorizing student voice: Values and perspectives. Improving Schools, 10(1), 5–17. doi:10.1177/1365480207073702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. (1990). “Discovery”, learning, critical thinking, and the nature of knowledge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 38(1), 3–14. doi:10.1080/00071005.1990.9973831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, P., Reed, F., & Smith, P. (2008). The effects of the school environment on young people’s attitudes towards education and learning: Summary report. National Foundation for Educational Research. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/73960/. Accessed March 2, 2014.

  • Story, M., Nanney, M. S., & Schwartz, M. B. (2009). Schools and obesity prevention: Creating school environments and policies to promote healthy eating and physical activity. Milbank Quarterly, 87(1), 71–100. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00548.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swearer, S. M., & Doll, B. (2001). Bullying in schools. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(2–3), 7–23. doi:10.1300/J135v02n02_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C. K. (2000). The influence of school architecture on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4), 309–330. doi:10.1108/09578230010373598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. (2010). Learning spaces, learning environments and the “displacement” of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 502–511. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00974.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titman, W. (1994). Special places, special people: The hidden curriculum of school grounds. Surrey, UK: World Wide Fund for Nature UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, A., Lai, P., So, M., & Yuen, K. (2006). A comparison of the effects of problem-based learning and lecturing on the development of students’ critical thinking. Medical Education, 40(6), 547–554. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02481.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uline, C. L., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Wolsey, T. D. (2009). The walls still speak: The stories occupants tell. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(3), 400–426. doi:10.1108/09578230910955818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva, K., Giles-Corti, B., Bulsara, M., Trapp, G., Timperio, A., McCormack, G., et al. (2013). Does the walkability of neighbourhoods affect children’s independent mobility, independent of parental, socio-cultural and individual factors? Children’s Geographies, 1–19. doi:10.1080/14733285.2013.812311

  • Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–795. doi:10.1177/00139160021972793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer, J. (2011). No child left thinking: Democracy at-risk in American schools. Colleagues, 3(2), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolner, P., Hall, E., Wall, K., & Dennison, D. (2007). Getting together to improve the school environment: User consultation, participatory design and student voice. Improving Schools, 10(3), 233–248. doi:10.1177/1365480207077846

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Colorado State University, 150 Aylesworth Hall, SE, 1574 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, USA

    Laura Healey Malinin

Authors
  1. Laura Healey Malinin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Healey Malinin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Urban and Regional Planning (ISR), Berlin Institute of Technology, Berlin, Germany

    Angela Million

  2. Urban and Regional Planning (ISR), Berlin Institute of Technology, Berlin, Germany

    Anna Juliane Heinrich

  3. Educational Science and Psychology, University of Siegen Educational Science and Psychology, Siegen, Germany

    Thomas Coelen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Malinin, L.H. (2017). Rethinking Educational Spaces in School Design. In: Million, A., Heinrich, A., Coelen, T. (eds) Education, Space and Urban Planning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38999-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38999-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38997-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38999-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation