Abstract
In recent years, quantitative empirical researchers in the field of educational sociology have become increasingly interested in not only whether, but more importantly how exactly, regional contexts have a bearing on educational outcomes. However, these analyses often exhibit a tension between theoretical conceptualization on the one hand and operationalization of regional contexts on the other: while, on a theoretical level, regional contexts are seen as constituted by patterns of social interaction with blurred boundaries, in contextual analyses, they are typically operationalized as “absolute” (administrative) places that are independent of each other. Starting from a concept of space rooted in geography, I advocate for an understanding of regional contexts that takes into account spatial relations of social phenomena in terms of social interrelations and exchange. If such spatial interdependencies are present conventional hierarchical models become inadequate. I demonstrate the extent of spatial interdependencies by looking at the example of data on youth unemployment on the level of districts (Landkreise).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In sociology, the term “social space” is—following Bourdieu (1999)—also used as a socio-structural metaphor. This is not how I am using it here.
- 2.
As researchers for data protection reasons is rarely provided with geo referenced personal data, social scientists generally have to limit their spatial analyses to a particular level of aggregation.
- 3.
The commuting matrix is standardized, i.e., it specifies the percentage of commuters from region i into region j in relation to all commuters from region i. Thanks to Per Kropp from the Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB) at Nuremberg for providing these data.
- 4.
The arrows connect the geographical centroids of the relevant administrative districts.
- 5.
Moran’s I allows for values between −1 (perfect negative autocorrelation) and 1 (perfect positive autocorrelation).
- 6.
Both variables are standardized.
Bibliography
Agnew, J. A. (2011). Space and place. In J. A. Agnew & D. N. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of Geographical Knowledge (pp. 316–330). London: Sage.
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics. Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.
Anselin, L. (2003). Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review, 26(2), 153–166.
Anselin, L. (2005). Spatial econometrics. In T. C. Mills & K. Patterson (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics (Vol. 1, pp. 901–941). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Anselin, L., Florax, R., & Rey, S. J. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in Spatial Econometrics. Methodology, Tools and Applications. Berlin und Heidelberg: Springer.
Bourdieu, P. (1999). Site effects. In P. Bourdieu et al. (Eds.), The Weight of the World. Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, (pp. 123 –129). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Browne, W. J. (2012). MCMC Estimation in MLwiN, Version 2.26. Bristol: University of Bristol.
Chaix, B., Merlo, J., Subramanian, S. V., Lynch, J., & Chauvin, P. (2005). Comparison of a spatial perspective with the multilevel analytical approach in neighborhood studies. The case of mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use in Malmo, Sweden, 2001. American Journal of Epidemiology, 162(2), 171–182.
Dietz, R. D. (2002). The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences. An Interdisciplinary Approach. Social Science Research, 31(4), 539–575.
Furlong, A., Biggart, A., & Cartmel, F. (1996). Neighbourhoods, opportunity structures and occupational aspirations. Sociology, 30(3), 551–565.
Garner, C. L., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1991). Neighborhood effects on educational attainment. A multilevel analysis. Sociology of Education, 64(4), 251–262.
Goldstein, H. G. (2011). Multilevel Statistical Models. Chichester: Wiley.
Goodchild, M. F., & Janelle, D. G. (Eds.). (2004). Spatially Integrated Social Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gulson, K. N., & Symes, C. (Eds.). (2007). Spatial Theories of Education. Policy and Geography Matters. New York, London: Routledge.
Heineck, G., Kleinert, C., & Vosseler, A. (2011). Regionale Typisierung: Was Ausbildungsmärkte vergleichbar macht. IAB-Kurzbericht, 13. Nürnberg: IAB.
Helbig, M. (2010). Neighborhood does matter! Soziostrukturelle Nachbarschaftscharakteristika und Bildungserfolg. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 62(4), 655–679.
Kropp, P., & Schwengler, B. (2011). Abgrenzung von Arbeitsmarktregionen—ein Methodenvorschlag. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 69(1), 45–62.
Kropp, P., & Schwengler, B. (2012). Vergleich von funktionalen Arbeitsmarktabgrenzungen in Deutschland. Sozialer Fortschritt, 61(1), 11–20.
Logan, J. R. (2012). Making a place for space. Spatial thinking in social science. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 507–524.
Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.
Morenoff, J. D. (2003). Neighborhood mechanisms and the spatial dynamics of birth weight. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 976–1017.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Willms, J. D. (Eds.). (1991). Schools, Classrooms, and Pupils. International Studies of Schooling from a Multilevel Perspective. San Diego: Academic Press.
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital. Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 633–660.
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240.
Waller, L. A., & Gotway, C. A. (2004). Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Ward, M. D., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2008). Spatial Regression Models. Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wicht, A. (2011). Zwischen Ausbildung und Arbeitsmarkt. Regionale Unterschiede beim Übergang von der beruflichen Erstausbildung in Beschäftigung. Siegen: Universität Siegen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wicht, A. (2017). Regional Contexts in Quantitative Educational Sociology. In: Million, A., Heinrich, A., Coelen, T. (eds) Education, Space and Urban Planning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38999-8_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38999-8_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38997-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38999-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)