Towards a Social Pedagogy of Urban Design

Chapter

Abstract

The social and cultural position of children in the city is largely influenced by urban design logics. Urban designers have a social pedagogical role when they design spaces for children in the city. We discuss three clusters of childhood constructions that affect current prescriptive ideas on the perfect child in the perfect city: the private, the autonomous and the public child. The aim is to focus on the particular interrelations between these constructions, pedagogical theories and perspectives on design. In conclusion, we will suggest an approach to design as a collective learning process, in which children are addressed as political subjects and fellow citizens who take part in this collective research and negotiation process with other citizens about possible future scenarios for urban spaces.

Keywords

Social pedagogy Urban design Research by design Community development Citizenship 

Bibliography

  1. Bezmez, D. (2013). Urban citizenship, the right to the city and politics of disability in Istanbul. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biesta, G. (2014). Learning in public places: Civic learning for the twenty-first century. In G. Biesta, M. De Bie, & D. Wildemeersch (Eds.), Civic learning, democratic citizenship and the public sphere (pp. 1–11). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke, C. (2005). Play in focus: Children researching their own spaces and places for play. Children, Youth and Environments, 15(1), 27–53.Google Scholar
  4. Coussée, F., & Verschelden, G. (2014). Social-cultural education in Flanders: Social pedagogical history. In J. Kornbeck & N. Rosendal Jensen (Eds.), Social pedagogy for the entire lifespan (pp. 102–121). Bremen: Europaeischer Hochschulverlag.Google Scholar
  5. Cunningham, H. (2005). Children and childhood in western society since 1500. Harlow UK: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  6. De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. De Visscher, S. (2008). De sociaal-pedagogische betekenis van de woonomgeving voor kinderen. Gent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
  8. De Visscher, S. (2014). Mapping children’s presence in the neighbourhood. In G. Biesta, M. De Bie, & D. Wildemeersch (Eds.), Civic learning, democratic citizenship and the public sphere (pp. 73–90). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Visscher, S., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2008). Recognising urban public space as a co-educator: children’s socialization in Ghent. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(3), 604–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Visscher, S., Bouverne-De Bie, M., & Verschelden, G. (2012). Urban public space and the construction of social life: a social-pedagogical perspective. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(1), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Depaepe, M. (2000). De pedagogisering achterna: aanzet tot een genealogie van de pedagogische mentaliteit in de voorbije 250 jaar. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  12. Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Washinton DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hämäläinen, J. (2012). Developmental psychology, youth sociology and social pedagogy. Three perspectives on youth work and youth work policy. In F. Coussée, H. Williamson, & G. Verschelden (Eds.), The history of youth work in Europe. Relevance for today’s youth work policy. Vol. 3 (pp. 93–104). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Hawkins, H. (2013). Geography and art. An expanding field: Site, the body and practice. Human Geography, 37(1), 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hewes, J. (2007). The value of play in early learning: Towards a pedagogy. In T. Jambor & J. Van Gils (Eds.), Several perspectives on children’s play (pp. 119–145). Antwerpen: Garant.Google Scholar
  16. Honig, M.-S. (1999). Entwurf einer Theorie der Kindheit. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  17. Huizinga, J. (1971). Homo ludens. A study of the play element in culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  18. James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: FalmerPress.Google Scholar
  19. Key, E. (1900). Barnets a rhundrade. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  20. Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos.Google Scholar
  21. Lefebvre, H. (1974). La production de l’espace. Paris: Anthropos.Google Scholar
  22. Mannion, G., & I’Anson, J. (2004). Beyond the Disneyesque. Children’s participation, spatiality and adult-child relations. Childhood, 11(3), 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKendrick, J., Bradford, M. G., & Fielder, A. (2000). Kid customer? Commercialization of playspace and the commodification of childhood. Childhood, 7(3), 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rasmussen, K., & Smidt, S. (2003). Children in the neighbourhood: The neighbourhood in the children. In P. Christensen & M. O’Brien (Eds.), Children in the city: home, neighbourhood and community (pp. 82–100). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Rousseau, J. J. (1817). Emile ou de l’éducation. Paris: Didot.Google Scholar
  26. Spencer, C., & Blades, M. (2006). Children and their environments: Learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolfreys, J. (1998). Deconstruction, Derrida. New York: St Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolfrum, S. (2013). Urbane Architektur_performative urbanism. http://www.iba-hamburg.de/fileadmin/Erleben_2013/Kongresse/Stadt_Neu_Bauen/SNB_Wolfrum.pdf. Accessed: 12 June 2014.
  29. Zelizer, V. A. (1985). Pricing the priceless child. The changing social value of children. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Work, Urban Education Research GroupUniversity College GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations