Whose Information? Information About What?

  • Jeffrey BubEmail author
Part of the The Frontiers Collection book series (FRONTCOLL)


My title is from an article by John Bell [1], in which he argues that terms like measurement or information have no place in the formulation of fundamental theories of physics.


Quantum Mechanic Intrinsic Randomness Quantum Probability Quantum World Born Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The research for this paper was supported in part by a University of Maryland Research and Scholarship (RASA) award during the academic year 2014–2014.


  1. 1.
    J.S. Bell, Against measurement. Phys. World, 8, 33–40 (1990). Reprinted in Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical and Physical Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, ed. by A. Miller (Plenum, New York, 1990), pp. 17–31Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27(379–423), 623–656 (1948)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Heisenberg, ‘Über quantentheoretischer umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Physik 33, 879–893 (1925)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Born, W. Heisenberg, P. Jordan, Zur quantenmechanik ii. Zeitschrift für Physik 35, 557–615 (1926)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Born, P. Jordan, Zur quantenmechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik 34, 858–888 (1925)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.N. Gleason, Measures on the closed sub-spaces of Hilbert spaces. J. Math. Mech. 6, 885–893 (1957)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Kochen, E.P. Specker. On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87 (1967)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Colbeck, R. Renner, No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power. Nat. Commun. 2, 411 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. von Neumann, Quantum logics: strict- and probability-logics, in Collected Works of John von Neumann IV, ed. by A.H. Taub (Pergamon Press, New York, 1961), pp. 195–197Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Schrödinger, Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 31, 555–563 (1935)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Schrödinger, Quantisierung als eigenwertproblem. Annalen der Physik 79, 361–376 (1926)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Schrödinger, An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules. Phys. Rev. 28, 1049–1070 (1926)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Schrödinger, Four lectures on wave mechanics, in Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics (Chelsea Publishing Company, New York, 1982), pp. 1745–1748Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.A.M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1958)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Itamar Pitowsky, Correlation polytopes, their geometry and complexity. Math. Program. A 50, 395–414 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Popescu, D. Rhorlich, Quantum nonlocality as an axiom. Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.-D. Bancal, S. Pironio, A. Acin, Y.-C. Liang, Valerio Scarani, Nicolas Gisin, Quantum nonlocality based on finite-speed causal influences leads to superluminal signaling. Nat. Phys. 8, 867 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. Scarani, J.-D. Bancal, A. Suarez, N. Gisin, Strong constraints on models that explain the violation of bell inequalities with hidden superluminal influences. Found. Phys. 44, 523–531 (2014)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.S. Bell, On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.S. Bell, Bertlmann’s socks and the nature of reality, in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987), pp. 139–158Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. Bohm, A suggested interpretation of quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables. I and II. Phys. Rev. 85, 166–193 (1952)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Goldstein, Bohmian mechanics, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by E.N. Zalta (2001).
  24. 24.
    H. Everett III, ‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454–462 (1957)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. Wallace, The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory according to the Everett Interpretation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1912)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Kent, One world versus many: the inadequacy of Everettian accounts of evolution, probability, and scientific confirmation, in Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality, ed. by S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent, D. Wallace (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010), pp. 307–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Einstein, What is the Theory of Relativity? in The London Times, p. 13. First published 28 Nov 1919. Also in A. Einstein, Ideas and Opinions (Bonanza Books, New York, 1954), pp. 227–232Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    H.A. Lorentz, The Theory of Electrons and its Applications to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat (B.G Teubner, Leipzig, 1909)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J.S. Bell, How to teach special relativity, in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987), pp. 67–80Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    N. Bohr, Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in modern physics, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, vol. VII, ed. by P.A. Schilpp, pp. 201–241. The Library of Living Philosophers (Open Court, La Salle, IL, 1949)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    N.P. Landsman, Between classical and quantum, in Philosophy of Physics Part A, ed. by J. Butterfield, J. Earman (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2007), pp. 417–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    N.P. Landsman, When champions meet: re-thinking the Bohr-Einstein debate. Stud. His. Philos. Mod. Phys. 37, 212–241 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentInstitute for Physical Science and Technology,Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations