New Dimensions for Entangled Photons: The Role of Information

Part of the The Frontiers Collection book series (FRONTCOLL)


This paper follows very closely the talk given at Quantum [Un]Speakables II: 50 Years of Bell’s Theorem. It will be argued that information plays a central role in interpreting and understanding real experiments.


Quantum Mechanic Quantum State Entangle State Scattered Radiation Photon Pair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) with SFB F40 (FoQuS).


  1. 1.
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Schrödinger, Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik, Naturwissenschaften 23, 823–828 (1935). (Translation: E. Schrödinger, The present situation in quantum mechanics. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 124, 323–38 (1980))Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Schrödinger, Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Proc. Camb. Philo. Soc. 31, 555–563 (1935)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Bohr, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Bell, On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.M. Greenberger, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, A. Zeilinger, Bell’s theorem without inequalities. Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131–1143 (1990)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Greenberger, M.A. Horne, A. Zeilinger, Going beyond Bell’s Theorem, in Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, ed. by M. Kafatos (Kluwer Academic, 1989), pp. 73–76Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Einstein, Remarks to the essays appearing in this collective volume, in Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, ed. by P.A. Schilpp (Tudor, New York, 1949), pp. 663–688Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Bertlmann, Bell’s universe: a personal recollection, in Quantum [Un]Speakables II, ed. by R. Bertlmann and A. Zeilinger (2015, this volume) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Gödel, A remark about the relationship between relativity theory and idealistic philosophy, in Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, ed. by P.A. Schilpp (Tudor, New York, 1949), pp. 555–562Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, M.A. Horne, A.K. Ekert, “Event-ready-detectors” Bell experiment via entanglement swapping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Peres, Delayed choice for entanglement swapping. J. Mod. Opt. 47, 139–143 (2000)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Coffman, J. Kundu, W.K. Wooters, Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.W. Pan, M. Daniell, S. Gasparoni, G. Weihs, A. Zeilinger, Experimental demonstration of four-photon entanglement and high-fidelity teleportation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Jennewein, G. Weihs, J.W. Pan, A. Zeilinger, Experimental nonlocality proof of quantum teleportation and entanglement swapping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017903 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    X.S. Ma, S. Zotter, J. Kofler, R. Ursin, T. Jennewein, Č. Brukner, A. Zeilinger, Experimental delayed-choice entanglement swapping. Nat. Phys. 8, 479–484 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Bohr, Discussions with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, eds. P.A. Schilpp (Tudor, New York, 1949), pp. 32–66Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.O. Scully, K. Drühl, Quantum eraser: a proposed photon correlation experiment concerning observation and “delayed choice” in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 25, 2208 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    X.S. Ma, J. Kofler, A. Zeilinger, Delayed-choice gedanken experiments and their realizations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015005 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E.P. Wigner, Two kinds of reality. Monist 48, 248 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. Heisenberg, Letter to Renninger, in The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, ed. M. Jammer (Wiley, New York, 1974)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G.B. Lemos, V. Borish, G.D. Cole, S. Ramelow, R. Lapkiewicz, A. Zeilinger, Quantum imaging with undetected photons. Nature 512, 409–412 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    X.Y. Zou, L.J. Wang, L. Mandel, Induced coherence and indistinguishability in optical interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 318 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D.M. Greenberger, M.A. Horne, A. Zeilinger, Multiparticle interferometry and the superposition principle. Phys. Today 46, 22–29 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Bell, Against measurement. Phys. World 8, 33–40 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Fickler, R. Lapkiewicz, M. Huber, M.P. Lavery, M.J. Padgett, A. Zeilinger, Interface between path and orbital angular momentum entanglement for high-dimensional photonic quantum information. Nat. Commun. 5, 4502 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology (VCQ)ViennaAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI)Austrian Academy of SciencesViennaAustria
  3. 3.Faculty of PhysicsUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations