Skip to main content

Challenges Priorities and Policies: Mapping the Research Requirements of Cybercrime and Cyberterrorism Stakeholders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Combatting Cybercrime and Cyberterrorism

Abstract

The following chapter provides an in depth look at a broad selection challenges related to Cybercrime and Cyberterrorism, as identified through prolonged engagement with a multitude of horizontal and vertical cyber-security stakeholders. Out of six critical areas identified, the two leading causes, were through the evolving rate of technology, and, the subsequent lack of education, awareness and training. These two underlying factors further influenced and affected the severity of the additional four critical areas; the capability of investigators, cooperation and information sharing, legislative systems and data protection, and, organisational and societal resilience. Through the consultation and elicitation of information from over 90 individual domain experts, practitioners and security stakeholders, the research of this chapter is dedicated towards improving international awareness towards leading threats, vulnerabilities, and challenges to the continually evolving sphere of cybersecurity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akhgar, B., Staniforth, A.: Tackling Cyber Crime and Cyber Terrorism Through a Methodological Approach. Freedom From Fear 2015 (2015). http://f3magazine.unicri.it/?p=621. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  2. Aspray, W.: Chasing Moore’s Law. SciTech Pub., Raleigh (2014). http://univebooks.com/file/C/Chasing-Moores-Law.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  3. Bauman, Z.: Modernity and the Holocaust. Polity Printing Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beck, U.: Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publications, Munich (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boehm, B.W.: Software Engineering Economics (1984). https://extras.springer.com/2002/978-3-642-59413-7/4/rom/pdf/Boehm_hist.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  6. Brenner, S.: Cyberthreats: The Emerging Fault Lines of the Nation State. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castells, M.: Information Technology, Globalization and Social Development. United Nations research Institute for Social Development (1999). http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/F270E0C066F3DE7780256B67005B728C?OpenDocument. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  8. Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: procesures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie 19(6), 418–427 (1990). http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00988593 Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  9. Council of Europe, Convention on CC. Counceil De L’Europe, Budapest (2001). http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/185.htm. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  10. Denning, D.E.: “Cyberterrorism,” Testimony Before the Special Oversight Panel on Terrorism, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. House of Representatives (2000). http://faculty.nps.edu/dedennin/publications/Testimony-Cyberterrorism2000.htm. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  11. ENISA, FAQ Cyber Europe 2010 Final (2015). www.enisa.europa.eu/media/news-items/faqs-cyber-europe-2010-final/view?searchterm=cyber%20europe. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  12. ENISA, CERT Cooperation and its further facilitation by relevant stakeholders (2015). https://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/cert/background/coop/files/cert-cooperation-and-its-further-facilitation-by-relevant-stakeholders. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  13. EU Executive Report, Smart Cities (2015). https://eu-smartcities.eu/sites/all/files/blog/files/Transformational%20Smart%20Cities%20-%20Symantec%20Executive%20Report.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  14. Glaser, B.G.: Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methology of Grounded Theory (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Giddens, A.: The Consequences of Modernity (1990). http://ewclass.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2015/02/Giddens_-_Consequences_of_Modernity_17388b4f6c76919ffe7817f7751c61fa.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  16. Guinchard, A.: Between Hype and Understatement: Reassessing Cyber Risks as a Security Strategy (2011). http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1107&context=jss. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  17. Koops, B.J.: The Internet and its Opportunities for CC (2010). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1738223. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  18. Kremer, J.-F., Müller, B.: Cyberspace and International Relations: Theory, Prospects and Challenges. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Landeta, J.: Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73, 467–482 (2005). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162505001381. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

    Google Scholar 

  20. Linstone, H., Turoff, M.: The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley (1975). https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=256068. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  21. Medland, D.: U.K. Study reveals Serious Underreporting of Cyber Atacks by Business. Forbers (2016). http://www.forbes.com/sites/dinamedland/2016/03/02/u-k-study-reveals-serious-under-reporting-of-cyber-attacks-by-business/#79392e1c392e. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  22. Microsoft, The Cybersecurity Risk Paradox: Impact of Social, Economic, and Technological Factors on Rates of Malware. Microsoft Security Intelligence Report, Special Edition (2014). http://download.microsoft.com/download/E/1/8/E18A8FBB-7BA6-48BD-97D2-9CD32A71B434/Cybersecurity-Risk-Paradox.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  23. Rumsfield, D.: Known and Unknown: A Memoir. Penguin Press, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salazar Ortuno, A.: Collective Intelligence. Crisis Response 10(3) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schneier, B.: Heartbleed. Schneier on Security (2014). https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/04/heartbleed.html. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-SEC-2013) as the COURAGE project under grant agreement no 607949.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas Wells .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wells, D., Brewster, B., Akhgar, B. (2016). Challenges Priorities and Policies: Mapping the Research Requirements of Cybercrime and Cyberterrorism Stakeholders. In: Akhgar, B., Brewster, B. (eds) Combatting Cybercrime and Cyberterrorism. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38930-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38930-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38929-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38930-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics