Advertisement

How Many Samples?! Assessing the Mean of Parameters Important for Denitrification in High and Low Disturbance Headwater Wetlands of Central Pennsylvania

  • Aliana BritsonEmail author
  • Denice H. Wardrop
Chapter

Abstract

Due to large time and monetary costs involved with sampling for denitrification and other biogeochemical processes, many studies are limited to only a few samples per site. However, denitrification is a highly spatially and temporally variable process due to high variability of the biogeochemical parameters underpinning denitrification such as nitrate (NO3), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, and pH. Accurately assessing wetlands for the means of parameters underpinning denitrification is vital, as inaccurate means can result in incorrect estimates of wetland-scale denitrification as well as inaccurate parameterization and validation of denitrification models. To examine adequate sample size for these parameters, shallow groundwater samples were collected from twenty wells each at two high disturbance (surrounded by agriculture) and two low disturbance (surrounded by forest) headwater riparian wetlands in central Pennsylvania on May 21st, 2013. A Monte Carlo analysis was used along with a cutoff of 10 % coefficient of variation to assess the appropriate number of samples required to accurately assess mean temperature, pH, DO, DOC, and NO3 within headwater wetlands. Temperature and pH required only one sample to accurately assess the site mean. DO required seven or more samples, while DOC and NO3 required ten or more samples to accurately assess the site mean. No differences were noted in required sample size between high and low disturbance sites. These results highlight the importance of taking numerous samples for wetland denitrification studies.

Keywords

Denitrification Sample size Headwater wetlands Dissolved organic carbon Nitrate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (Grant #R834262), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and The Pennsylvania State University. We would like to thank the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, The Pennsylvania State Experimental Forest, and Larry Suwak for wetland access. We thank Karol Confer with and Michael Brown for assistance with water sample analysis. We wish to acknowledge Dr. Jessica Moon for assistance with the Monte Carlo simulation R code. Last but not least, we also appreciate field assistance from Bret Dietz, Marla Korpar, Kyle Martin, Danny Molinaro, and Jason Britson.

References

  1. Addy, K., Kellogg, D., Gold, A., Groffman, P., Ferendo, G., Sawyer, C. (2002). In situ push-pull method to determine ground water denitrification in riparian zones. Journal of Environmental Quality, 31, 1017–1024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, M., & Vervier, P. (2004). Hydrological variability, organic matter supply and denitrification in the Garonne River ecosystem. Freshwater Biology, 49, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernal, S., Sabater, F., Butturini, A., Nin, E., Sabater, S. (2007). Factors limiting denitrification in a Mediterranean riparian forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 2685–2688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bettez, N., & Groffman, P. (2012). Denitrification potential in stormwater control structures and natural riparian zones in an urban landscape. Environmental Science and Technology, 46, 10909–10917.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks, R., Brinson, M., Wardrop, D., Bishop, J. (2013) Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification, inventory, and reference wetlands. In R. Brooks, & D. Wardrop (Eds.), Mid-Atlantic freshwater wetlands: Advances in wetland science, management, policy, and practice (pp. 39–60). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgin, A., Groffman, P., Lewis, D. (2010). Factors regulating denitrification in a riparian wetland. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 74(5), 1826–1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casey, R., Taylor, M., Klaine, S. (2001). Mechanisms of nutrient attenuation in a subsurface flow riparian wetland. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30, 1732–1737.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Casey, R., Taylor, M., Klaine, S. (2004). Localization of denitrification activity in macropores of a riparian wetland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 563–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clément, J., Holmes, R., Peterson, B., Pinay, G. (2003). Isotopic investigation of denitrification in a riparian ecosystem in western France. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 1035–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, M., Dunne, E., Bruland G. (2008). Spatial variability of soil properties in cypress domes surrounded by different land uses. Wetlands, 28(2), 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cosandey, A., Maître, V., Guenat, C. (2003). Temporal denitrification patterns in different horizons of two riparian soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 54, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, J., Griffith, S., Horwath, W., Steiner, J., Myrold, D. (2008). Denitrification and nitrate consumption in an herbaceous riparian area and perennial ryegrass seed cropping system. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 72(5), 1299–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dhondt, K., Boeckx, P., Hofman, G., Van Cleemput, O. (2004). Temporal and spatial patterns of denitrification enzyme activity and nitrous oxide fluxes in three adjacent vegetated riparian buffer zones. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 40, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gift, D., Groffman, P., Kaushal, S., Mayer, P. (2010). Denitrification potential, root biomass, and organic matter in degraded and restored urban riparian zones. Restoration Ecology, 18, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Groffman, P. & Crawford, M. (2003). Denitrification potential in urban riparian zones. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 1144–1149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Groffman, P., Altabet, M., Böhlke, J., Butterbach-Bahl, K., David, M., Firestone, M., Giblin, A., Kana, T., Nielsen, L., Voytek, M. (2006). Methods for measuring denitrification: Diverse approaches to a difficult problem. Ecological Applications, 16, 2091–2122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hagedorn, F., Saurer, M., Blaser, P. (2004). A 13C tracer study to identify the origin of dissolved organic carbon in forested mineral soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 55, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hedin, L., Von Fischer, J., Ostrom, N., Kennedy, B., Brown, M., Robertson, G. (1998). Thermodynamic constraints on nitrogen transformations and other biogeochemical processes at soil-stream interfaces. Ecology, 79, 684–703.Google Scholar
  19. Hefting, M., Bobbink, R., de Caluwe, H. (2003). Nitrous oxide emission and denitrification in chronically nitrate-loaded riparian buffer zones. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 1194–1203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hefting, M., Clément, J., Dowrick, D., Cosandey, A., Bernal, S., Cimpian, C., Tatur, A., Burt, T., Pinay, G. (2004). Water table elevation controls on soil nitrogen cycling in riparian wetlands along a European climatic gradient. Biogeochemistry, 67, 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, A. & Cardaci, M. (2004). Denitrification and organic carbon availability in riparian wetland soils and subsurface sediments. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68(1), 320–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill, A., Devito, K., Campagnolo, S., Sanmugadas, K. (2000). Subsurface denitrification in a forest riparianzone, interactions between hydrology and supplies of nitrate and organic carbon. Biogeochemistry, 51, 193–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hochstein, L., Betlach, M., Kritikos, G. (1984). The effect of oxygen on denitrification during steady-state growht of Paracoccus halodenitrificans. Archives of Microbiology, 137, 74–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hunter, R. & Faulkner, S. (2001). Denitrification potentials in restored and natural bottomland hardwood wetlands. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65, 1865–1872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hychka, K., Brooks, R., Cole, A. (2013). Hydrology of Mid-Atlantic freshwater wetlands. In R. Brooks, & D. Wardrop (Eds.), Mid-Atlantic freshwater wetlands: Advances in wetland science, management, policy, and practice (pp. 109–129). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Istok, J., Humphrey, M., Schroth, M., Hyman, M., O’Reilly, K. (1997). Single-well, “Push-Pull” test for in situ determination of microbial activities. Ground Water, 35, 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, R., & Hood, M. (1980). Effects of temperature, pH, salinity, and inorganic nitrogen on the rate of ammonium oxidation by nitrifiers isolated from wetland environments. Microbial Ecology, 6, 339–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jordan, T., Andrews, M., Szuch, R., Whigham, D., Weller, D., Jacobs, A. (2007). Comparing functional assessments of wetlands to measurements of soil characteristics and nitrogen processing. Wetlands, 27, 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kellogg, D., Gold, A., Groffman, P., Addy, K., Stolt, M., Blazejewski, G. (2005). In situ ground water denitrification in stratified, permeable soils underlying riparian wetlands. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 524–533.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Langergraber, G., Rousseau, D., García, J., Mena, J. (2009). CWM1: A general model to describe biokinetic processes in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 59, 1687–1697.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, C., Frolking, S., Frolking, T. (1992). A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: 1. Model structure and sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, 9759–9776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maitre, V., Cosandey, A., Parriaux, A., Guenat, C. (2005). A methodology to estimate the denitrifying capacity of a riparian wetland. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 707–716.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McCarty, G., Mookherji, S., Angier, J. (2007). Characterization of denitrification activity in zones of groundwater exfiltration within a riparian wetland ecosystem. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 43, 691–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClain, M., Boyer, E., Dent, C., Gergel, S., Grimm, N., Groffman, P., Hart, S., Harvey, J., Johnston, C., Mayorga, E., McDowell, W., Pinay, G. (2003). Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems, 6, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moon, J. (2012). Linkages between wetland condition and microbial habitats, their heterogeneity, and associated microbial communities in the ridge and valley region of Pennsylvania. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  36. Moon, J., & Wardrop, D. (2013). Linking landscapes to wetland condition: A case study of eight headwater complexes in Pennsylvania. In R. Brooks, & D. Wardrop (Eds.), Mid-Atlantic freshwater wetlands: Advances in wetland science, management, policy, and practice (pp. 61–108). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olde Venterink, H., Jan, E., Der Lee, V., Guda, E., Den Hoorn, V., Martin, W., Bert, L., Jos, T. (2006). Importance of sediment deposition and denitrification for nutrient retention in floodplain wetlands. Applied Vegetation Science, 9, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Orr, C., Stanley, E., Wilson, K., Finlay, J. (2007). Effects of restoration and reflooding on soil denitrification in a leveed midwestern floodplain. Ecological Applications, 17, 2365–2376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Parkin, T., & Tiedje, J. (1984). Application of a soil core method to investigate the effect of oxygen concentration on denitrification. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 16, 331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Penn State Cooperative Wetlands Center. (2004). Monitoring and assessing Pennsylvania Wetlands. US, EPA. X-827157-01.Google Scholar
  41. Pinay, G., Gumiero, B., Tabacchi, E., Gimenez, O., Tabacchi-Planty, A., Hefting, M., Burt, T., Black, V., Nilsson, C., Iordache, V., Bureau, F., Vought, L., Petts, G., Décamps, H. (2007). Patterns of denitrification rates in European alluvial soils under various hydrological regimes. Freshwater Biology, 52, 252–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Racchetti, E., Bartoli, M., Soana, E., Longhi, D., Christian, R., Pinardi, M., Viaroli, P. (2011). Influence of hydrological connectivity of riverine wetlands on nitrogen removal via denitrification. Biogeochemistry, 103, 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roach, J., & Grimm, N. (2011). Denitrification mitigates n flux through the stream-floodplain complex of a desert city. Ecological Applications 21, 2618–2636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rotkin-Ellman, M., Addy, K., Gold, A., Groffman, P. (2004). Tree species, root decomposition and subsurface denitrification potential in riparian wetlands. Plant and Soil, 263, 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seitzinger, S. (1994). Linkages between organic matter mineralization and denitrification in eight riparian wetlands. Biogeochemistry, 25, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sgouridis, F., Heppell, C., Wharton, G., Lansdown, K., Trimmer, M. (2011). Denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) in a temperate re-connected floodplain. Water Research, 45, 4909–4922.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Simek, M., & Cooper, J. (2002). The influence of soil pH on denitrification: Progress towards the understanding of this interaction over the last 50 years. European Journal of Soil Science, 53, 345–354.Google Scholar
  48. Sirivedhin, T. & Gray, K. (2006). Factors affecting denitrification rates in experimental wetlands: Field and laboratory studies. Ecological Engineering, 26, 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stander, E. & Ehrenfeld, J. (2009). Rapid assessment of urban wetlands, do hydrogeomorphic classification and reference criteria work? Environmental Management, 43, 725–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sutton-Grier, A., Ho, M., Richardson, C. (2009). Organic amendments improve soil conditions and denitrification in a restored riparian wetland. Wetlands, 29, 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sutton-Grier, A., Kenney, M., Richardson, C. (2010). Examining the relationship between ecosystem structure and function using structural equation modelling, a case study examining denitrification potential in restored wetland soils. Ecological Modelling, 221, 761–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ullah, S., Breitenbeck, G., Faulkner, S. (2005). Denitrification and N2O emission from forested and cultivated alluvial clay soil. Biogeochemistry, 73, 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wardrop, D., Kentula, M., Jensen, S., Stevens, D., Hychka, K., Brooks, R. (2007a). Assessment of wetlands in the Upper Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA using the hydrogeomorphic approach. Wetlands, 27, 432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wardrop, D., Kentula, M., Stevens, D., Jensen, S., Brooks, R. (2007b). Assessment of wetland condition: An example from the Upper Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands, 27, 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Watson, T., Kellogg, D., Addy, K., Gold, A., Stolt, M., Donohue, S., Groffman, P. (2010). Groundwater denitrification capacity of riparian zones in suburban and agricultural watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 46, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Woodward, K., Fellows, C., Conway, C., Hunter, H. (2009). Nitrate removal, denitrification and nitrous oxide production in the riparian zone of an ephemeral stream. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41, 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geography DepartmentPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations