Performance Intensifications in a Hybrid Constructed Wetland Mesocosm

  • Adam SochackiEmail author
  • Korneliusz Miksch


This chapter presents the study on the performance of a hybrid mesocosm constructed wetland system composed of two treatment step: vertical flow bed and floating emergent macrophyte unit (a tank with a vegetated floating mat). The objectives of this study were to assess the performance intensifications in this system by assessing the effect of: (i) combing two types of constructed wetlands, (ii) increasing saturation level in the vertical flow unit, (iii) applying artificial intermittent aeration in the vertical flow unit, on the removal of carbonaceous compounds, nitrogen species and (phosphate phosphorus) P-PO4. The duration of the experiment was 378 days and it was divided into 4 periods: two periods with unsaturated vertical flow bed (but with different hydraulic loading rate values) and two periods with saturated bed of the vertical flow unit (in one period the bed was additionally intermittently aerated). The experimental system was fed with synthetic municipal waste water in a batch mode. It was observed that the intensification of the system’s performance by integrating a vertical flow bed with partly saturated conditions and a floating emergent macrophyte unit ensured high removal efficiencies for total nitrogen (TN) and P-PO4. Additionally, the application of artificial intermittent aeration in a vertical flow bed allowed achieving high removal efficiency of carbonaceous compounds (determined as dissolved organic carbon) without compromising the removal of TN and P-PO4. The scope of further research will include optimization of the system for hydraulic retention time and batch duration and monitoring of the fate of selected micropollutants in the system.


Hybrid Vertical flow Constructed wetland Floating emergent macrophyte Intermittent aeration 



The project was supported by the Grant UMO-2012/05/B/ST8/02739 entitled Mechanism of pharmaceuticals removal in constructed wetlands from the National Science Centre (Poland). Dr Ewa Felis and Dr Grzegorz Cema are acknowledged for their valuable suggestions regarding the experiment and insightful comments on this chapter. Ms Monika Nowrotek is acknowledged for her help in the laboratory and in setting up the experiment. Mr Maciej Stefanek is acknowledged for his technical support.


  1. Ávila, C., Matamoros, V., Reyes-Contreras, C., Piña, B., Casado, M., Mita, L., Rivetti, C., Barat, C., García, J., & Bayona, J.M. (2014). Attenuation of emerging organic contaminants in a hybrid constructed wetland system under different hydraulic loading rates and their associated toxicological effects in wastewater. Science of the Total Environment, 470, 1272–1280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boog, J., Nivala, J., Aubron, T., Wallace, S., van Afferden, M., & Müller, R.A. (2014). Hydraulic characterization and optimization of total nitrogen removal in an aerated vertical subsurface flow treatment wetland. Bioresource Technology, 162, 166–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Borne, K.E., Fassman-Beck, E.A., & Tanner, C.C. (2014). Floating treatment wetland influences on the fate of metals in road runoff retention ponds. Water Research, 48, 430–442.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fan, J., Wang, W., Zhang, B., Guo, Y., Ngo, H.H., Guo, W., Ngo, H.H., Guo, W., & Wu, H. (2013). Nitrogen removal in intermittently aerated vertical flow constructed wetlands: Impact of influent COD/N ratios. Bioresource Technology, 143, 461–466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Foladori, P., Ruaben, J., & Ortigara, A.R. (2013). Recirculation or artificial aeration in vertical flow constructed wetlands: A comparative study for treating high load wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 149, 398–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fonder, N., & Headley, T. (2013). The taxonomy of treatment wetlands: A proposed classification and nomenclature system. Ecological Engineering, 51, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garcia, J., Rousseau, D.P.L., Morato, J., Lesage, E., Matamoros, V., & Bayona, J.M. (2010). Contaminant removal processes in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 561–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kadlec, R.H., & Wallace, S. (2009). Treatment wetlands, Second edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kim, B., Gautier, M., Molle, P., Michel, P., & Gourdon, R. (2015). Influence of the water saturation level on phosphorus retention and treatment performances of vertical flow constructed wetland combined with trickling filter and FeCl3 injection. Ecological Engineering, 80, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Langergraber, G., Pressl, A., Leroch, K., Rohrhofer, R., & Haberl, R. (2010). Comparison of single-stage and a two-stage vertical flow constructed wetland systems for different load scenarios. Water Science and Technology, 61, 1341–1348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu, R., Zhao, Y., Doherty, L., Hu, Y., & Hao, X. (2015). A review of incorporation of constructed wetland with other treatment processes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 279, 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Merck. (2013). Instructions for use. Spectroquant® COD solutions A + B. 114682e-1. Merck: KGaA, Germany.Google Scholar
  13. Miksch, K., Cema, G., Corvini, P.F.X., Felis, E., Sochacki, A., Surmacz-Górska, J., Wiszniowski, J., & Żabczynski, S. (2015). R&D priorities in the field of sustainable remediation and purification of agro-industrial and municipal wastewater. New Biotechnology, 32(1), 128–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nopens, I., Capalozza, C., & Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2001). Stability analysis of a synthetic municipal wastewater. Belgium: Department of Applied Mathematics Biometrics and Process Control, University of Gent.Google Scholar
  15. Nowrotek, M., Sochacki, A., Felis, E., & Miksch, K. (2016). Removal of diclofenac and sulfamethoxazole from synthetic municipal waste water in microcosm downflow constructed wetlands: Start-up results. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 18(2):157–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Reddy, K.R., & DeLaune, R.D. (2008). Biogeochemistry of wetlands: Science and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. StatSoft, Inc. (2011). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10.
  18. Tanner, C.C., & Headley, T.R. (2011). Components of floating emergent macrophyte treatment wetlands influencing removal of stormwater pollutants. Ecological Engineering, 37(3), 474–486.Google Scholar
  19. Vohla, C., Kõiv, M., Bavor, H.J., Chazarenc, F., & Mander, Ü. (2011). Filter materials for phosphorus removal from wastewater in treatment wetlands—A review. Ecological Engineering, 37(1), 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vymazal, J. (2005). Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecological Engineering, 25(5), 478–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vymazal, J. (2013). The use of hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment with special attention to nitrogen removal: A review of a recent development. Water Research, 47(14), 4795–4811.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Whitfield, C.J., Adkinson, A., Eimers, M.C., & Watmough, S.A. (2010). The adsorption and release of sulfur in mineral and organic soils of the Athabasca oil sands region, Alberta, Canada. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39(3), 1108–1112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wu, S., Kuschk, P., Brix, H., Vymazal, J., & Dong, R. (2014). Development of constructed wetlands in performance intensifications for wastewater treatment: A nitrogen and organic matter targeted review. Water Research, 57, 40–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhi, W., Yuan, L., Ji, G., & He, C. (2015). Enhanced long-term nitrogen removal and its quantitative molecular mechanism in tidal flow constructed wetlands. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(7), 4575–4583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Power and Environmental Engineering, Environmental Biotechnology DepartmentSilesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland
  2. 2.Centre for BiotechnologySilesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland

Personalised recommendations