Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Convergence in Creativity Development for Mathematical Capacity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity and Giftedness

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

In this chapter, we highlight the role of convergence in developing creativity and mathematical capacity. We renew our understanding of creativity from the relations of three creativity mechanisms: Convergence in divergence for emergence, and three principles of experience: Continuity, interaction and complementarity. Convergence in the context of creativity development is an incidence of learning for capacity building and knowledge construction. Examples of convergent processes in learning are: setting a plan, having a structure, and possessing coordinated capacity to complete a task. To elaborate, we refer to theories of development and creativity on how people develop their capacity in convergence (e.g., collaboration), through mathematical learning (e.g., with coherence, congruence), and for creativity (e.g., imagination). We make reference to convergent creativity of an eminent mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887–1920) for a reflection on developing creativity and building capacity for good life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 997–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, G. (n.d.-a). An introduction to the loss notebook. http://www.personal.psu.edu/gea1/pdf/78.pdf. Downloaded on 2 Sep 2015.

  • Andrew, G. (n.d. b). The meaning of Ramanujan, now and the future. http://www.personal.psu.edu/gea1/pdf/274.pdf. Downloaded on 2 Sep 2015.

  • Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogical imagination. Austin: University of Taxes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 611–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, B. C. (n.d.). An overview of Ramanujan’s notebooks. http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~berndt/articles/aachen.pdf. Downloaded on 2 Sep 2015.

  • Bohr, N. (1950). On the notions of causality and complementarity. Science, 111(2873), 51–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, A., & Sriraman, B. (2009). Aesthetics and creativity: An exploration of the relationships between the constructs. In B. Sriraman & S. Goodchild (Eds.), Relatively and philosophically earnest: Festschrift in honor of Paul Ernest’s 65th birthday (pp. 57–80). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1937). I and thou (translated by Ronald Gregor Smith). Edinburg: Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoff, K., Gordon, A., & Smith, R. (2008). The role of spontaneous thought in human cognition. In O. Vartanian & D. R. Mandel (Eds.), Neuroscience in decision making (pp. 259–284). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (1999). Creative development in the early years: Some implications of policy for practice. The Curriculum Journal, 10(1), 135–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A system view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J (1937/1997). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. (1984). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. (2001). The role of positive emotion in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotion. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 41(1), 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64(2), 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, G. H. (1937). The Indian mathematician Ramanujan. The American Mathematical Monthly, 44(3), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P. L. (2012). Understanding creative culture divergence: A Bakhtinian reflection form a culture-crossing scholar. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarczak, R. L. (2011). An information processing perspective on divergence and convergence in collaborative learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastenhofer, K. (2007). Converging epistemic cultures? A discussion drawing from empirical findings. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(4), 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J., & Beghetto, R. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. (J. Teller, trans., J. Kilpatrick & I. Wirszup, Eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. L. (2000–2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • May. (1975). The courage to create. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, L. W. (2014). The interplay between spontaneous and controlled processing in creative cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(663), 1–5. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, B. D., Pickett, C. L., & Simonton, D. K. (2008). Conceptual versus empirical creativity: Which works best on convergent and divergent thinking tasks? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitari, K. (1991). Nishida Kitaro. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1928). Judgement and reasoning in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1968). Logic and psychology. American Psychologist, 23(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponomerav, I. A. A. (2008a). Prospects of development of the psychology of creativity (I). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 46(3), 17–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponomerav, I. A. A. (2008b). Prospects of development of the psychology of creativity (II). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 46(4), 3–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, P. J., Leatham, K. R., & Wright, G. A. (2013). Convergent cognition. Instructional Sciences, 41, 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). Mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist view of psychotherapy. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. R. (1999). The emergence of creativity. Philosophical Psychology, 12(4), 447–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2002). How do mathematically gifted students abstract and generalize mathematical concepts. NAGC 2002 Research Briefs (Distinguished Brief of the Year), 16, 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2003). Can mathematical discovery fill the existential void? The use of conjecture, proof and refutation in a high school classroom (feature article). Mathematics in School, 32(2), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2004a). Discovering a mathematical principle: The case of Matt. Mathematics in School, 33(2), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2004b). Discovering Steiner triple systems through problem solving. The Mathematics Teacher, 97(5), 320–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2004c). Reflective abstraction, uniframes and the formulation of generalizations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(2), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness & creativity synonyms in mathematics? An analysis of constructs within the professional and school realms. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B., & Lee, K. H. (2016). The Hobbesian trap in contemporary India and Korea: Implications for education in the 21st century. In D. Ambrose & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Giftedness and ralent in the 21st century: Adapting to the turbulence of globalization. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theory of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., & Lubart, T. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospect and paradigm. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), A handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundararajan, L., & Raina, M. K. (2013). Revolutionary creativity, east and west: A critique from indigenous psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 35(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. G. (2012). Constructive creativity for growth. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher level thinking (pp. 192–204). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. G. (2014). Cross-disciplinary creativity. In E. Shiu (Ed.), An interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research handbook (pp. 68–85). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. G. (2015a). Teaching mathematics creatively. In R. Wegriff, J. Kaufman, & L. Li (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research and teaching thinking (pp. 411–423). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. G. (2015b). Convergent creativity: From Arthur Cropley (1935–) onwards. Creativity Research Journal, 27(3), 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance tests of creative thinking-norms-technical manual research education – verbal tests forms A and B, figural test, forms A and B. Princeton: Personnel Test.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in the society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, H. (2012). Mathematics as liberal education: Whitehead and the rhythm of life. Interchange, 43, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, T., Baucal, A., Cornish, F., & Gillespie, A. (2007). Collaborative research, knowledge and emergence. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41, 208–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nanyang Technological University Singapore (National Institute of Education), 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore, 637616, Singapore

    Ai-Girl Tan

  2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA

    Bharath Sriraman

Authors
  1. Ai-Girl Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bharath Sriraman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ai-Girl Tan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education RANGE Center, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Roza Leikin

  2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA

    Bharath Sriraman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tan, AG., Sriraman, B. (2017). Convergence in Creativity Development for Mathematical Capacity. In: Leikin, R., Sriraman, B. (eds) Creativity and Giftedness. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38838-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38840-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation