What propels creativity in learning? In this chapter, we discuss a long-standing—yet often overlooked—form of reasoning that helps address this question. That form of reasoning is called abductive reasoning (introduced by the early American Pragmatist, Charles Sanders Peirce). Abductive reasoning represents a special form of creative reasoning that is triggered by states of genuine doubt. Genuine doubt occurs whenever our everyday habits and beliefs fall short in making sense of a situation. In the context of learning, genuine doubt occurs anytime a learner is unable to inductively or deductively reason through an academic task or situation. As we will discuss, these states of doubt represent opportunities for creative learning. Specifically, our aim in this chapter is to demonstrate, by way of example, how abduction and creativity work together in every day learning. We will also discuss how understanding this link will help clarify efforts aimed at supporting creativity in the classroom, expand current conceptions of creativity, and provide directions for research on creativity in educational settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Arici, A. D., Schreiber, J. B., Sugioka, H., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998, April). Abductive reasoning and the problem solving on the World Wide Web. A paper presented at the Annual American Education Research Association, San Diego California.
Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Ideational code-switching: Walking the talk about supporting student creativity in the classroom. Roeper Review, 29, 265–270.
Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Beghetto, R. A. (2016a). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15, 6–23.
Beghetto, R. A. (2016b). Learning as a creative act. To appear in T. Kettler (Ed.), Modern curriculum for gifted and advanced Learners. New York: Routledge.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for mini-c creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25, 53–69.
Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: All roads lead to creativity or you can’t get there from here? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Bear (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 316–332). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Burks, A. W. (1946). Peirce’s theory of abduction. Philosophy of Science, 13, 301–306.
Cole, D. (2014). The Chinese room argument. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2014 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/chinese-room/.
Cunningham, D. J., Arici, A., Schreiber, J., & Lee, K. (2002). Navigating the World Wide Web: The role of abductive reasoning. International Journal of Applied Semiotics, 3(2), 39–58.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity and learning. In D. B. Lindsley & A. A. Lumsdaine (Eds.), Brain function (Brain function and learning, Vol. IV). Los Angles: University of California Press.
Houser, N. (1987). Toward a Peircean semiotic theory of learning. The American Journal of Semiotics, 5(2), 251–274.
Josephson, J. R., & Josephson, S. G. (Eds.). (1996). Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155–165.
Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting talk to work. London: Routledge.
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 30–47.
Pharies, D. A. (1985). Charles S. Peirce and the linguistic sign (Vol. 9). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York: Grossman.
Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativ- ity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.
Rothenberg, A. (1996). The Janusian process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 207–231.
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Schreiber, J. B. (2001, April). Problem based learning and Peircean reasoning: Barry a case study. Paper presented at the National Consortium for Instruction and Cognition Seattle, WA.
Shank, G., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996, October). Modeling the six modes of Peircean abduction for educational purposes. In Annual meeting of the Midwest AI and Cognitive Science Conference, Bloomington, IN.
Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. M. E. Sharpe, Inc. (Trans.). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7–97. (Original work published 1967).
Editors and Affiliations
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beghetto, R.A., Schreiber, J.B. (2017). Creativity in Doubt: Toward Understanding What Drives Creativity in Learning. In: Leikin, R., Sriraman, B. (eds) Creativity and Giftedness. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38838-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38840-3