Skip to main content

Introduction: Caste Studies and the Apocryphal Elephant

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

‘When thinking about India it is hard not to think of caste’, said Nicholas Dirks as the opening statement of his book Castes of Mind (Dirks 2001). Even though the book seemed to indicate some reservations about such a situation, neither the book, nor anything that has followed, has altered the situation. The study of India across disciplines has been significantly shaped and driven by the study of caste. Caste is still considered the ‘master key to unlocking the Indian world’ (Guha 2013, 21). References to caste in literature about India go back at least to the sixteenth century. Thus, it certainly has a well-established lineage of scholarly interest and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a discussion about how gotra further complicates these matters, especially in relation to seeing castes as endogamous groups see, Jalki and Pathan (2015).

  2. 2.

    For discussions of endogamy as a property of the ‘caste system’ see, Martin Fárek in this volume and Jalki and Pathan (2015).

  3. 3.

    While it is not clear exactly what elements Dirks claims existed and what new elements were introduced, he does say, ‘caste – at least in the areas of southern India that I had studied intensively – was profoundly embedded within political society, not at all as it has been portrayed in contemporary anthropological literature’ (Dirks 2001, ix).

  4. 4.

    ‘Caste associations sprung up to contest their alleged position in the official hierarchy, holding meetings, writing petitions and organising protests. By 1931 some caste groups were distributing handbills to their fellow caste members to tell them how to answer questions about their religious and sectarian affiliations, as also their race, language and caste status. After 1931, the British could no longer ignore the political fallout of the census, and abandoned the use of caste for census counting altogether’ (Dirks 2001, 48).

  5. 5.

    Reference here is to Balagangadhara’s unpublished writings.

  6. 6.

    This is from a post made on the yahoo forum formed to discuss Balagangadhara’s book The Heathen in his Blindness in 2003. Many of the points raised in this Introduction were first raised in discussions that took place on this forum over the past 13 years. For this particular post see https://beta.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/TheHeathenInHisBlindness/conversations/messages/2859.

Bibliography

  • Anonymous. 1841. “Art. IV-The History of India. By the Hon. Mountstuart Elphinstone. 2 vols. London, 1841.” The Quarterly Review, LXVIII: June and September: 377–413. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balagangadhara, S.N. 1994. “The Heathen in His Blindness…”: Asia, the West, and the Dynamic of Religion. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balagangadhara, S.N. 2005. The Heathen in His Blindness…Asia, the West, and the dynamic of Religion. New Delhi: Manohar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balagangadhara, S.N. 2012. Reconceptualizing India Studies. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, Nicholas B. 2001. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elphinstone, Mountstuart. 1841. The History of India. Vol. 1. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fárek, Martin. 2015. “Caste or Qualification? Chaitanya Vaishnava Discussions about Brahmanas in Colonial India.” Theatrum Historiae 17: 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, Sumit. 2013. Beyond Caste. Identity in South Asia, Past and Present. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalki, Dunkin, and Sufiya Pathan. 2015. “On the Difficulty of Refuting or Confirming the Arguments about the Caste System.” Theatrum Historiae 17: 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani, Lata. 1998. Contentious Traditions. Berekeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, Declan. 1993. The Interpretation of Caste. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarendra, Padmanabh. 2011. “Census in Colonial India and the Birth of Caste.” Economic and Political Weekly 46(33): 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterfield, Henry. 1875. Memorandum on the Census of British India of 1871–72. Available at www.payer.de/quellenkunde/quellen1601.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Fárek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fárek, M., Jalki, D., Pathan, S., Shah, P. (2017). Introduction: Caste Studies and the Apocryphal Elephant. In: Fárek, M., Jalki, D., Pathan, S., Shah, P. (eds) Western Foundations of the Caste System. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38761-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38761-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38760-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38761-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics