Skip to main content

The Politics of Agenda in the Union Debates

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Rhetoric in the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, 1830–1870

Part of the book series: Studies in Modern History ((SMH))

  • 141 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter consists of a discussion of the politicisation of the agenda in the Oxford and Cambridge Unions’ public debates roughly between the reform acts in 1832 and 1867. As well as relating the setting of political agenda to the classical rhetorical tradition of inventio, Haapala contrasts the Union practices to the parliamentary setting of debating on both sides of an issue. The chapter also proposes that the Union public debates showed the use of certain rhetorical commonplaces, or topoi, which are named as principle, expediency, character and vote of confidence. Finally, Haapala offers a typology of political agenda setting in the Unions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Sources

  • Cambridge Union Society [CUS] laws [1824–1870]. Laws of the Union Society. Cambridge: Cambridge Union Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Union Society [CUS] minute book [1823–1874]. Minute Book [vols 1–14]. Cambridge: Cambridge Union Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Union Society [OUS] minute book [1831–1869]. Minute Book [vols I–X]. Oxford: Oxford Union Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Union Society [OUS] rules [1837–1867]. Rules and Regulations. Oxford: Oxford Union Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Speculative Society of Edinburgh 1905. The History of the Speculative Society, 1764–1904. Edinburgh: Constables. http://archive.org/details/historyofspecula00specuoft

  • Transactions of the Oxford Union Debating Society: 1823–1825. Copy of the original text. Oxford: Oxforshire Records Office.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Aristotle 1984. On Sophistical Refutations. Translated by W. A. Pickard–Cambridge. In: The Complete Works of Aristotle. Vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 278–314. http://tinyurl.com/hw3ot4w

  • Bagehot, Walter 2001 (1867). The English Constitution. (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought). Edited by Paul Smith, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Asa 1984 (1959). The Age of Improvement, 1783–1867. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, Gilbert [Lord] 1958 (1929). An Introduction to the Procedure of the House of Commons. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, Marcus Tullius 1942. De partitione oratoria. Translated by H. Rackham. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, Stefan 1985. The Idea of ‘Character’ in Victorian Political Thought. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 35, 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, Stefan 2006 (1991). Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, Stefan, Donald Winch and John Burrow 1987 (1983). That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Walter Morley 1935. The University Pitt Club, 1835–1935. Completed by Charles Montague Fletcher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J. H. 1969. Character and Style in English Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronbeck, Bruce 1982. Symbolic Dimensions of Parliamentary Procedure in the Late 18th-Century English Commons. Parliamentary Journal 23 (2), 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakewill, William 1659. Modus Tenendi Parliamentum, or, The Old Manner of Holding Parliaments in England Extracted Out of Our Ancient Records: With Certain Municipal Rights and Customes of this Commonwealth of England. Together with, the Priviledges of Parliament: And the Manner How Lawes are There Enacted by Passing of Bills. Collected Many Years Past Out of the Journal of the House of Commons. London: John Benson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halévy, Elie. 1955. The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism. Translated by Mary Morris, with a Preface by A. D. Lindsay, Master of Balliol College, Oxford. Boston: The Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatsell, John 1818 (1781). Precedents of Proceedings in the House of Commons; Under Separate Titles, with Observations. Vol. 2: Relating to members, speaker, etc. London: Hansards, 4th edition. https://archive.org/details/precedentsofproc02hats

  • Hawkins, Angus 1989. ‘Parliamentary Government’ and Victorian Political Parties, c. 1830–c. 1880. The English Historical Review 104 (412), 638–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledger-Lomas, Michael 2004. The Character of Pitt the Younger and Party Politics, 1830–1860. The Historical Journal 47 (3), 641–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune, Anthony 1984 (1979). The Gentlemen’s Clubs of London. Photographs by Malcolm Lewis. London: Parkgate Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, Peter 2002. Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice. (Ideas in Context, vol. 63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Ged 2000. The Cambridge Union and Ireland, 1815–1914. Edinburgh: Ann Barry. http://www.gedmartin.net/index.php/published-work-mainmenu-11/146-the-cambridge-union-and-ireland-1815-1914

  • May, Thomas Erskine 1844. A Treatise upon the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament. London: Charles Knight. http://openlibrary.org/books/OL23427007M/A_Treatise_Upon_the_Law_Privileges_Proceedings_and_Usage_of_Parliament

  • McCarthy, Justin 1903. British Political Portraits. New York: Outlook. https://archive.org/details/britishpolitical00mccauoft

  • Morstein-Marx, Robert 2004. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrogorski, Moisei 1964. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. Volume I: England. Edited and abridged by Seymour Martin Lipset. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palgrave, Reginald F. D. 1878 (1869). The Chairman’s Handbook. Suggestions and Rules for the Conduct of Chairmen of Public and Other Meetings, Drawn from the Procedure and Practice of Parliament, 3rd and revised edition. London: Knight. https://archive.org/details/chairmanshandbo01palggoog

  • Palonen, Kari 2008. Speaking Pro et Contra: The Rhetorical Intelligibility of Parliamentary Politics and the Political Intelligibility of Parliamentary Rhetoric. In: Suvi Soininen and Tapani Turkka (eds) The Parliamentary Style of Politics. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association, 82–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, Jonathan 2006. The Politics of Patriotism: English Liberalism, National Identity and Europe, 1830–1886. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen, Markku 2013. Rhetoric, Politics and Popularity in Pre-Revolutionary England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, Barry 1983. Power and the Party: A History of the Carlton Club, 1832–1982. Foreword by Rt. Hon. Margaret Thatcher, MP. The Carlton Lecture, 1982 by Rt. Hon. Harold Macmillan. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, Josef 1908. The Procedure of the House of Commons: A Study of its History and Present Form, Vols. 1–2. Translated from German by A. Ernest Steinthal, with an introduction by Sir Courtenay Ilbert, Clerk of the House of Commons. London: A. Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Christopher 2012. Imprison’d Wranglers. The Rhetorical Culture of the House of Commons, 1760–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Loren 1953. Gladstone’s Essay on Public Speaking [1838]. The Quarterly Journal of Speech 39 (3), 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jonathan and Christopher Stray 2001. Introduction. In: Jonathan Smith and Christopher Stray (eds) Teaching and Learning in Nineteenth-Century Cambridge. (History of the University of Cambridge Texts and Studies 4). Woodbridge: Boydell, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Frank M. 1981. The Greek Heritage in Victorian Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbridge, George 1978. The Reform Club, 1836–1978: A History from the Club’s Records. With a foreword by Maurice Ashley, C.B.E. New York: Clearwater.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haapala, T. (2016). The Politics of Agenda in the Union Debates. In: Political Rhetoric in the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, 1830–1870. Studies in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35128-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35128-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-35127-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-35128-5

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics