Abstract
In the synthesis problem, we are given a specification \(\psi \) over input and output signals, and we synthesize a system that realizes \(\psi \): with every sequence of input signals, the system associates a sequence of output signals so that the generated computation satisfies \(\psi \). The above classical formulation of the problem is Boolean. First, correctness is Boolean: a computation satisfies the specification \(\psi \) or does not satisfy it. Then, other important and interesting measures like the size of the synthesized system, its robustness, price, and so on, are ignored. The paper surveys recent efforts to address and formalize different aspects of quality of synthesized systems. We start with multi-valued specification formalisms, which refine the notion of correctness and enable the designer to specify quality, and continue to the quality measure of sensing: the detail in which the inputs should be read in order to generate a correct computation. The first part is based on the articles [1–3]. The second part is based on [4, 5].
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement no. 278410, and from The Israel Science Foundation (grant no. 1229/10).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The observant reader may be concerned by our use of \(\max \) and \(\min \) where \(\sup \) and \(\inf \) are in order. In [3] we prove that there are only finitely many satisfaction values for a formula \(\varphi \), thus the semantics is well defined.
- 2.
Observe that in our semantics the satisfaction value of future events tends to 0. One may think of scenarios where future events are discounted towards another value in [0, 1] (e.g., discounting towards \(\frac{1}{2}\) as ambivalence regarding the future).
- 3.
We note that, alternatively, one could define the sensing level of states, with \({ slevel}(q)=\frac{{ scost}(q)}{|P|}\). Then, for all states q, we have that \({ slevel}(q) \in [0,1]\). All our results hold also for this definition, simply by dividing the sensing cost by |P|.
References
Almagor, S., Boker, U., Kupferman, O.: Formalizing and reasoning about quality. In: Fomin, F.V., Freivalds, R., Kwiatkowska, M., Peleg, D. (eds.) ICALP 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7966, pp. 15–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Almagor, S., Boker, U., Kupferman, O.: Discounting in LTL. In: Ábrahám, E., Havelund, K. (eds.) TACAS 2014 (ETAPS). LNCS, vol. 8413, pp. 424–439. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Almagor, S., Boker, U., Kupferman, O.: Formalizing and reasoning about quality. J. ACM (2016, to appear)
Almagor, S., Kuperberg, D., Kupferman, O.: Regular sensing. In: Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, LIPIcs, vol. 29, pp. 161–173. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany (2014)
Almagor, S., Kuperberg, D., Kupferman, O.: The sensing cost of monitoring and synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, LIPIcs, vol. 35, pp. 380–393. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany (2015)
Avni, G., Kupferman, O.: Synthesis from component libraries with costs. In: Baldan, P., Gorla, D. (eds.) CONCUR 2014. LNCS, vol. 8704, pp. 156–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Bloem, R., Chatterjee, K., Greimel, K., Henzinger, T.A., Hofferek, G., Jobstmann, B., Könighofer, B., Könighofer, R.: Synthesizing robust systems. Acta Inf. 51(3–4), 193–220 (2014)
Bloem, R., Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A., Jobstmann, B.: Better quality in synthesis through quantitative objectives. In: Bouajjani, A., Maler, O. (eds.) CAV 2009. LNCS, vol. 5643, pp. 140–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A., Jobstmann, B.: Environment assumptions for synthesis. In: van Breugel, F., Chechik, M. (eds.) CONCUR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5201, pp. 147–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A., Jobstmann, B., Singh, R.: Measuring and synthesizing systems in probabilistic environments. In: Touili, T., Cook, B., Jackson, P. (eds.) CAV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6174, pp. 380–395. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Church, A.: Logic, arithmetics, and automata. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, 1962, pp. 23–35. Institut Mittag-Leffler (1963)
de Alfaro, L., Faella, M., Henzinger, T.A., Majumdar, R., Stoelinga, M.: Model checking discounted temporal properties. Theor. Comput. Sci. 345(1), 139–170 (2005)
Droste, M., Kuich, W., Vogler, H. (eds.): Handbook of Weighted Automata. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Droste, M., Rahonis, G.: Weighted automata and weighted logics with discounting. Theor. Comput. Sci. 410(37), 3481–3494 (2009)
Droste, M., Vogler, H.: Weighted automata and multi-valued logics over arbitrary bounded lattices. Theor. Comput. Sci. 418, 14–36 (2012)
Faella, M., Legay, A., Stoelinga, M.: Model checking quantitative linear time logic. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 220(3), 61–77 (2008)
Fisman, D., Kupferman, O., Lustig, Y.: Rational synthesis. In: Esparza, J., Majumdar, R. (eds.) TACAS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6015, pp. 190–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Grinstead, C., Snell, J.L.: 11:Markov chains. In: Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society (1997)
Kans, S.H.: Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Boston (2002)
Krob, D.: The equality problem for rational series with multiplicities in the tropical semiring is undecidable. Int. J. Algebra Comput. 4(3), 405–425 (1994)
Kupferman, O., Lustig, Y., Vardi, M.Y., Yannakakis, M.: Temporal synthesis for bounded systems and environments. In: Proceedings of the 28th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, pp. 615–626 (2011)
Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.Y.: Model checking of safety properties. Formal Methods Syst. Des. 19(3), 291–314 (2001)
Kwiatkowska, M.Z.: Quantitative verification: models techniques and tools. In: ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE, pp. 449–458 (2007)
Mohri, M.: Finite-state transducers in language and speech processing. Comput. Linguist. 23(2), 269–311 (1997)
Moon, S., Lee, K., Lee, D.: Fuzzy branching temporal logic. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 34(2), 1045–1055 (2004)
Pnueli, A., Rosner, R.: On the synthesis of a reactive module. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 179–190 (1989)
Schewe, S., Finkbeiner, B.: Bounded synthesis. In: Namjoshi, K.S., Yoneda, T., Higashino, T., Okamura, Y. (eds.) ATVA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4762, pp. 474–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Sistla, A.P.: Safety, liveness and fairness in temporal logic. Formal Aspects Comput. 6, 495–511 (1994)
Spinellis, D.: Code Quality: The Open Source Perspective. Addison-Wesley Professional, Upper Saddle River (2006)
Vardi, M.Y.: From verification to synthesis. In: Shankar, N., Woodcock, J. (eds.) VSTTE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5295, p. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: An automata-theoretic approach to automatic program verification. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 332–344 (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kupferman, O. (2016). On High-Quality Synthesis. In: Kulikov, A., Woeginger, G. (eds) Computer Science – Theory and Applications. CSR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9691. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34171-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34171-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34170-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34171-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)