Building the Seshat Ontology for a Global History Databank

  • Rob Brennan
  • Kevin Feeney
  • Gavin Mendel-Gleason
  • Bojan Bozic
  • Peter Turchin
  • Harvey Whitehouse
  • Pieter Francois
  • Thomas E. Currie
  • Stephanie Grohmann
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9678)

Abstract

This paper describes OWL ontology re-engineering from the wiki-based social science codebook (thesaurus) developed by the Seshat: Global History Databank. The ontology describes human history as a set of over 1500 time series variables and supports variable uncertainty, temporal scoping, annotations and bibliographic references. The ontology was developed to transition from traditional social science data collection and storage techniques to an RDF-based approach. RDF supports automated generation of high usability data entry and validation tools, data quality management, incorporation of facts from the web of data and management of the data curation lifecycle.

This ontology re-engineering exercise identified several pitfalls in modelling social science codebooks with semantic web technologies; provided insights into the practical application of OWL to complex, real-world modelling challenges; and has enabled the construction of new, RDF-based tools to support the large-scale Seshat data curation effort. The Seshat ontology is an exemplar of a set of ontology design patterns for modelling uncertainty or temporal bounds in standard RDF. Thus the paper provides guidance for deploying RDF in the social sciences. Within Seshat, OWL-based data quality management will assure the data is suitable for statistical analysis. Publication of Seshat as high-quality, linked open data will enable other researchers to build on it.

Keywords

Ontology engineering Ontology design patterns Cliodynamics 

References

  1. 1.
    Turchin, P., Brennan, R., Currie, T., Feeney, K., Francois, P., Hoyer, D., et al.: Seshat: the global history databank. Cliodynamics J. Quant. Hist. Cult. Evol. 6, 77–107 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Francois, P., Manning, J., Whitehouse, H., Brennan, R., Currie, T., Feeney, K., Turchin, P.: A macroscope for global history. Seshat Global History Databank: a methodological overview (Submitted)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Villazón-Terrazas, B., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Reusing and re-engineering non-ontological resources for building ontologies. In: Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, pp. 107–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mendel-Gleason, G., Feeney, K., Brennan, R.: Ontology consistency and instance checking for real world linked data. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Linked Data Quality co-located with 12th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2015), Portorož, Slovenia, 1 June 2015Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cox, S.J.D.: Time ontology extended for non-gregorian calendar applications. Seman. Web J. (2015, to appear). http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/time-ontology-extended-non-gregorian-calendar-applications-0
  6. 6.
    Feeney, K., Mendel-Gleason, G., Brennan, R.: Linked data schemata: fixing unsound foundations. Submission to Seman. Web J. (2015). http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/linked-data-schemata-fixing-unsound-foundations
  7. 7.
    Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., McGuinness, D. (eds.): PROV-O: The PROV Ontology, W3C Recommendation, 30 April 2013Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanderson, R., Ciccarese, P., Van de Sompel, H. (eds.): Open Annotation Data Model, Community Draft, 08 February 2013. http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
  9. 9.
    W3C Uncertainty Reasoning for the World Wide Web XG, UncertaintyOntology (2005). http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/urw3/wiki/UncertaintyOntology.html
  10. 10.
    Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P., Sattler, U.: OWL 2: The next step for OWL. J. Web Seman. 6(4), 309–322 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.websem.2008.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zaveri, A., Rula, A., Maurino, A., Pietrobon, R., Lehmann, J., Auer, S.: Quality assessment for linked data: a survey. Seman. Web 7, 1–31 (2015). doi:10.3233/SW-150175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO 21127: 2014 Information and documentation – a reference ontology for the interchange of cultural heritage information, 2nd edn., ISO (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bizer, C., Lehmann, J., Kobilarov, G., Auer, S., Becker, C., Cyganiak, R., Hellmann, S.: DBpedia-a crystallization point for the web of data. J. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 7, 154–165 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sabloff, P.L.W.: Mapping Mongolia: Situating Mongolia in the World from Geologic Time to the Present. University of Pennsylvania Press, Pennsylvania (2011). ISBN 978-1-934536-18-6Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Slingerland, E., Sullivan, B.: Durkheim with data: the database of religious history (DRH). J. Am. Acad. Relig. (2015, in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rob Brennan
    • 1
  • Kevin Feeney
    • 1
  • Gavin Mendel-Gleason
    • 1
  • Bojan Bozic
    • 1
  • Peter Turchin
    • 2
  • Harvey Whitehouse
    • 3
  • Pieter Francois
    • 3
    • 4
  • Thomas E. Currie
    • 5
  • Stephanie Grohmann
    • 3
  1. 1.KDEG and ADAPT, School of Computer Science and StatisticsTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ConnecticutMansfieldUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary AnthropologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  4. 4.History Group, School of HumanitiesUniversity of HertfordshireHatfieldUK
  5. 5.Centre for Ecology and Conservation, BiosciencesUniversity of ExeterPenrynUK

Personalised recommendations