Abstract
There are several different models of disability that are important for rehabilitation professionals working in medical rehabilitation to understand in order to work with persons with disabilities. Various ideas and theories exist regarding the nature and definition of disability. In this section, five of the most prominent and influential disability models are discussed: the moral model, the medical model, the rehabilitation model, the social model, and the diversity model. Terminology stemming from these models has personal, social, medical, and political implications for disability. Words such as impairment, handicap, and disability have specific meanings, and it is imperative that those in the field of rehabilitation medicine grasp the models that are the origins of, and understand the significance of, each of these terms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Olkin R. What psychotherapists should know about disability. New York: Guilford; 1999.
Andrews E, Elliott T. Physical rehabilitation programs. In: Hunter CL, Hunter CM, Kessler R, editors. Handbook of clinical psychology in medical settings: evidence based assessment and intervention. 2nd edn. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 673–690
Kaplan R. Quality of life: an outcomes perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(2):S44–50.
Longmore P. Uncovering the hidden history of disabled people. Rev Am Hist. 1987;15:355–64.
Brock D. Preventing genetically transmissible diseases while respecting persons with disabilities. In: Wasserman D, Wachbroit R, Bickenbac J, editors. Quality of life and human difference: genetic testing, health care, and disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 67–100.
Evans J. Why the medical model needs disability studies (and vice-versa): a perspective from rehabilitation psychology. Disability Stud Q. 2004;24(4):93–8.
Wright B. Physical disability: a psychosocial approach. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row; 1983.
Altman B. Disability definitions, models, classification schemes, and applications. In: Albredht G, Seelman K, Bury M, editors. Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001. p. 97–122.
Peterson D, Elliott T. Advances in conceptualizing and studying disability. In: Lent R, Brown S, editors. Handbook of counseling psychology. 4th ed. New York: Sage; 2008. p. 212–30.
Andrews E, Kuemmel A, Williams J, et al. Providing culturally competent supervision to trainees with disabilities rehabilitation settings. Rehabil Psychol. 2013;58(3):233–44.
Gill C. A psychological view of disability culture. Disability Stud Q. 1995;15:15–9.
World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: Author; 2001.
World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: Author; 1980.
Goodley D. Disability studies: an interdisciplinary introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011.
McRuer R. Crip theory: cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press; 2006.
Mitchell D, Snyder S. Narrative prosthesis: disability and the dependencies of discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrews, E.E. (2017). Disability Models. In: Budd, M., Hough, S., Wegener, S., Stiers, W. (eds) Practical Psychology in Medical Rehabilitation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34034-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34034-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34032-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34034-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)