Advertisement

UrbanBoundariesSpace. Disturbing Choices and the Place of the Critical Research/Researcher in the Capitalist Wile

  • Mônica MesquitaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is a deep outburst! This outburst first materialized as a presentation during a small international meeting of mathematics education researchers—DOME (Disorder of Mathematics Education), in early 2015 in Berlin. Mathematic education researchers committed to Critical Social Theory made up the core participants at the DOME. The central aim of this chapter is to propose some thoughts regarding our situationality as critical researchers and considering the position that our research occupies in the capitalist wile. The systematization of the presented arguments came as a result of a reflexion on my recent path as mathematics education researcher and educator, self-labelled as critical. The discourse begins with a brief introduction of some points of view over our choices, questioning our freedom, going through the political flows of our survival, and enquiring the role of our production, reproduction, and contradictions as critical researchers—passing to another stage as critical researchers.

Keywords

Urban System Urban Space Academic Dream Mathematics Education Researcher Political Tool 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Lia Laporta, Liz de Freitas, David Swanson, and Alexandre Pais … thank you very much for the discussion times! Special thanks to Hauke Straehler- Pohl for the warmth and professionalism with which he edited this work. This chapter was developed in the context of Post-Doctorate in Science Education, funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, under internal identification: SFRH/BPD/87248/2012.

References

  1. Balibar, E. (2002/2011). Politics and the other scene. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Balibar, E. (2012). Classes notes (Summer course: Social critical theory). London, UK: Birkbeck Institute/London University.Google Scholar
  3. Balibar, E. (2014). In Globalization and the crisis of cosmopolitan idea. Public Lecture. Turkey: Bogazici University. Retrieved May 6.Google Scholar
  4. Balibar. E. (2010). Europe is a dead political project. In The Guardian. Retrieved May 25, from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/may/25/eu-crisis-catastrophic-consequences.
  5. Children of Men. (2006). Dir. and co-author Alfonso Cuarón. Perf. Clive Owen and Julianne Moore. Universal Pictures. DVD.Google Scholar
  6. Demo, P. (1998). O Charme da Exclusão Social. Campinas: Autores Associados.Google Scholar
  7. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
  8. Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen contradiction and the end of the capitalism. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  9. Jesus, C., & Mesquita, M. (2000). Relatório do Curso de Matemática da IV Etapa do Curso de Formação de Professores Indígenas. Brasília: FUNAI.Google Scholar
  10. Lefebvre, H. (1970/2009). Reflections on the politics of space. In N. Brenner & S. Elden (Eds.), State, space, world: Selected essays, Henri Lefebvre. (pp. 167–184). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Mesquita, M. (2014). Fronteiras Urbanas. Sobre a humanização do espaço. In M. Mesquita (Ed.), Ensaios sobre a humanização do espaço (pp. 19–31). Anonymage: Viseu.Google Scholar
  12. Mesquita, M. (2015). Urban boundaries and love: the rebirth of political thought within the disturbing education. International Journal of Žižek Studies, 9(2).Google Scholar
  13. Mesquita, M., Restivo, S., & D’Ambrosio, U. (2011). Asphalt children and city streets. A life, a city, and a case study of history, culture, and ethnomathematics in São Paulo. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  14. Nietzsche, F. (1878/1996). Human, All too Human, trans. In R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Rancière, J. (1995). In J. Rose (Ed.), Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Santos, B. (2001). Towards and epistemology of blindness—why the new forms of “Cerimonial Adequacy” neither regulate or emancipate. European Journal of Social Theory, 4(3), 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tragtenber, M. (1990/2002). Sobre Educação, Política e Sindicalismo. In Revista Espaço Académico, Ano II, n° 14. Maringá: Universidade Estadual de Maringá Ed. http://www.espacoacademico.com.br/014/14mtrag1990.htm.
  18. Žižek, S. (1989). Cynicism as a form of ideology. In The sublime object of ideology (pp. 28–30). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  19. Žižek, S. (2002). Welcome to the desert of the real. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  20. Žižek, S. (2006). The parallax view. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Žižek, S. (2001). Lenin’s choice. In Repeating Lenin. Lacan.com. http://www.lacan.com/replenin.htm.
  22. Žižek, S. (2006a). Children of men: Comments by Slavoj Žižek. In Cuaron, A. (Ed.), Children of men. DVD. Universal City, CA, USA: Universal Studios.Google Scholar
  23. Žižek, S. (2010). The end of nature. Retrieved December 2, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/02/opinion/global/02iht-GA12zizek.html?_r=0.
  24. Žižek, S. (2014). O Guia da Ideologia do Ódio. Retrieved November 4th, from http://vimeo.com/110715167.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Policy and GovernanceMARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences CentreCaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations