Skip to main content

Does Law Without Force Exist?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 599 Accesses

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 117))

Abstract

Virtually all norms of a legal system are more or less closely connected to the enforcement of law . The reasons for this coercive character of law is to be found in the state’s monopoly of legitimate coercion, conflicting interests of the members of society and the unpredictability of the behavior of human beings. The coercive character of law ensures the effectiveness of law and therefore legal security. As legal security is a fundamental value of any legal order and society, the effectivity of law based on the enforcement of law is a reasonable argument to obey the law “just because it is the law”. Therefore the force of law might not be the only or even the main reason to follow the law, but it is a necessary condition to obey it. As law has no empirical existence without obedience, it does not exist without force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Therefore it is correct when Shapiro (2011, 176), states, “that, when the law does use force, it is always organized”.

  2. 2.

    In so far it is correct when Shapiro (2011, 63) points out “that sanctions and nullity have the same basic function: they both are negative incentives” (emphasizes in original).

  3. 3.

    The theory of the “Fehlerkalkül” was developed by Merkl (1923, 293), a disciple of Hans Kelsen.

References

  • Austin, J. (1862). Lectures on jurisprudence (Vol. II). Lecture XXIII. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1998). Law´s Empire. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The concept of law (3d ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, H. (2009). Pure theory of law (2d ed.). Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkl, A. J. (1923). Die Lehre von der Rechtskraft entwickelt aus dem Rechtsbegriff: eine rechtstheoretische Untersuchung. Wien: Franz Deuticke Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauer, F. (2015). The force of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. J. (2011). Legality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Potacs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Potacs, M. (2016). Does Law Without Force Exist?. In: Bezemek, C., Ladavac, N. (eds) The Force of Law Reaffirmed. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 117. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33987-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33987-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33986-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33987-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics