Heutagogy in an Emerging Curriculum

  • Michael SnowdenEmail author
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)


The goal of this chapter is to highlight the potential value of Heutagogy approaches within the curriculum and to highlight two possible strategies as a means of embedding this approach into practise within the social science curriculum and to stimulate debate on the merits and pitfalls of adopting such approaches.


Curriculum Engagement Heutagogy Solution-focused teaching 


  1. Alred, G., & Garvey, B. (2000). Learning to produce knowledge—The contribution of mentoring. Mentoring and Training, 8(3), 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, J., & Clark, R. (2011). Peer mentoring works! How peer mentoring enhances student success in higher education. Birmingham: Aston University.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, M., & Wallis, M. (1999). Mentorship in nursing: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(1), 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyryris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, R. (1994). The limits of competence: Knowledge, higher education and society. Buckingham: SRHE, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/OUP.Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, R. (2011). Learning about learning: A conundrum and a possible resolution. London Review of Education, 9(1), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnett, R. (2012). The coming of the ecological university. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barnett, R. (2014). Conditions of flexibility: Securing a more responsive higher education system. York: HEA.Google Scholar
  11. Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 322–326.Google Scholar
  13. Breen, L., Drew, N., Pike, L., Pooley, J. A., & Young, A. (2001). Evaluation of the School of Psychology Peer Mentoring Programme—Semester 1, 2000. In A. Herriman & M. M. Kulski (Eds.), Expanding Horizons in Teaching and Learning. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Teaching and Learning Forum, Feb 7–9, 2001. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. Retrieved July 20, 2015, from
  14. Campbell, T. A., & Campbell, D. E. (2007). Outcomes of mentoring at-risk college students: Gender and ethnic matching effects. Mentoring and Tutoring, 15(2), 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Canning, N., & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education knowledge and action research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Clutterbuck, D., & Lane, G. (2004). The situational mentor: An international review of competencies and capabilities in mentoring. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  18. Colley, H. (2002). A rough guide to the history of mentoring from a Marxist feminist perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 28(3), 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fachin-Lucas, K. (2001). The social construction of mentoring roles. Mentoring and Tutoring, 9(1), 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flumerfeldt, S., Ingram, I., Broakcberg, K., & Smith, J. (2007). A study of higher education and student achievement based on transformative and lifelong learning processes. Mentoring and Tutoring, 15(1), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garvey, R., Stokes, P., & Megginson, D. (2009). Coaching and mentoring theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. Retrieved Sept 11, 2015, from Scholar
  24. Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson-Bailey, J., & Cervero, R. M. (2004). Mentoring in Black and White: The intricacies of cross-cultural mentoring. Mentoring and Tutoring, 12, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knowles, M. (1983). Self directed learning a guide for learners and teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge Adult Education.Google Scholar
  27. Kram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 110–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lennox-Terrion, J., & Leonard, D. (2010). Motivation of paid peer mentors and unpaid peer helpers in higher educationinternational. Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 8(1), 85–103.Google Scholar
  30. Margolis, H. (2005). Increasing struggling learner’s self-efficacy: What tutors can do and say. Mentoring and Tutoring, 13(2), 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McAllister, M. (2003). Doing practice differently: Solution focused nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(6), 528–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McLean, M. (2004). Does the curriculum matter in peer mentoring? From mentee to mentor in problem based learning: A unique case study. Mentoring and Tutoring, 12(2), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. N. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Piper, H., & Piper, J. (2000). Disaffected young people as the problem: Mentoring is the problem, mentoring as the solution, education and work as the goal. Journal of Education and Work, 13(1), 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. QAA. (2015). The quality code for higher education. Retrieved Oct 27, 2015, from
  37. Race, P. (2005). Making learning happen: A guide for post compulsory education. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Roberts, A. (2000). Mentoring revisited: A phenomenological reading of the literature. Mentoring and Tutoring, 8(2), 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodger, S., & Tremblay, P. F. (2003). The effects of a Peer mentoring Program on Academic Success Among First Year University Students. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 33(3), 1–17.Google Scholar
  40. Rossi, F., & Rosli, A. (2014). Indicators of university–industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Studies in Higher Education, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.914914.
  41. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  42. Shea, G. F. (2002). Mentoring: how to develop successful mentor behaviours 3rd edition Rochester. AXZO Press.Google Scholar
  43. Snowden, M., & Hardy, T. (2012). Peer mentorship: Yes! It does have a positive effect on student retention and academic success for both mentor and mentee. Journal of Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 19(2), 76–92.Google Scholar
  44. Stephenson, J. (1998). The concept of capability and its importance in higher education. In J. Stephenson & M. Yorke (Eds.), Capability and quality in higher education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  45. Stringer-Cawyer, C., Simonds, C., & Davis, S. (2002). Mentoring to facilitate socialisation: The case of the New Faculty Member. Qualitative Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Terrion, J. Lennox & Leonard, D. (2007). A taxonomy of the characteristics of student peer mentors in higher education: Findings from a literature review. Mentoring & Tutoring, 15(2), 149–164.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioural and Social SciencesUniversity of HuddersfieldQueensgateUK

Personalised recommendations