Dynamic mathematical digital resources promise a transformation of the teaching and learning of mathematics by enabling teachers and learners to experience and explore difficult mathematical ideas in more tangible ways. However, reports of classroom practice reveal an underuse of such technologies—particularly by learners—and research findings articulate the complexities of the process of classroom integration by teachers. The work described in this chapter is set in the context of a large-scale multi-year study, Cornerstone Maths (CM), which aims to overcome known barriers to technology use in lower secondary mathematics with the professional development of the participating teachers as a central tenet. Here, the design and implementation of the CM professional development as experienced by a group of four teachers from one school’s mathematics department is examined from a Wengerian perspective as a means to understand the trajectories of teachers’ growth in both their mathematical knowledge for teaching and their associated emerging mathematical pedagogic practices with technology.
- Mathematics teaching
- Digital technologies
- Community of practice
- Classroom integration
- Learning environment
- Professional development
- Subject content knowledge
- Pedagogical practice
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Aldon, G. (2011). Interactions didactiques dans la classe de mathématiques en environnement numérique: Construction et mise à l’épreuve d’un cadre d’analyse exploitant la notion d’incident. Thèse de doctorat. Ph.D., Université Lyon 1.
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245–274.
Borba, M. C., & Confrey, J. (1996). A student’s construction of transformations of functions in a multiple representational environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 319–337.
Clark-Wilson, A. (2010). How does a multi-representational mathematical ICT tool mediate teachers’ mathematical and pedagogical knowledge concerning variance and invariance?. Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Education.
Clark-Wilson, A., Aldon, G., Cusi, A., Goos, M., Haspekian, M., Robutti, O., & Thomas, M. (2014). The challenges of teaching mathematics with digital technologies - The evolving role of the teacher. In Liljedahl, P., Nichol, C., Oesterle, S., & Allan, D. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.
Clark-Wilson, A., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2015). Conceptualising the scaling of mathematics teachers’ professional development concerning technology. In Novotna, J. (Ed.). 9th Congress of European Research on Mathematics Education, 2015, 4th–8th February 2015, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Clark-Wilson, A., & Noss, R. (2015). Hiccups within technology mediated lessons: A catalyst for mathematics teachers’ epistemological development. Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 92.
Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., & Sinclair, N. (2014). The mathematics teacher in the digital era: An international perspective on technology focused professional development. Dordrecht: Springer.
Foster, C., Swan, M., & Wake, G. (2014). The lesson study process: Lessons for mathematical problem solving. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
Godwin, S., & Sutherland, R. (2004). Whole-class technology for learning mathematics: The case of functions and graphs. Education Communication and Information, 4, 131–152.
Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (1999). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3, 195–227.
Haspekian, M. (2005). An “Instrumental Approach” to study the integration of a computer tool into mathematics teaching: The case of spreadsheets. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10, 109–141.
Hill, H., & Ball, D. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 330–351.
Hoyles, C., Kent, P., Noss, R., & Smart, T. (2012). Cornerstone mathematics: An approach to technology-enhanced curriculum innovation at scale. BSRLM Day Conference, 9th June 2012, University of Sussex.
Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J. B. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematics education and technology - Rethinking the terrain: The 17th ICMI Study. Berlin: Springer.
Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Vahey, P., & Roschelle, J. (2013). Cornerstone mathematics: Designing digital technology for teacher adaptation and scaling. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 1057–1070.
Kaput, J. (1986). Information technology and mathematics: Opening new representational windows. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5, 187–207.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40, 331–337.
Romberg, T., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. (Eds.). (1993). Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artefacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 77–102.
Wenger, E. (1998a). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker. 9. Retrieved July 14, 2008, from http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/lss.shtml.
Wenger, E. (1998b). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zehetmeier, S. (2015). Sustaining and scaling up the impact of professional development programmes. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 117.
The development of Cornerstone Maths (2010–2013) was funded initially by the Li Ka Shing Foundation and it was an intensive collaboration between teams at the London Knowledge Lab, UCL Institute of Education, UK and at the Center for Technology in Learning, SRI International, Menlo Park, USA.
The research reported in this paper (Developing teachers’ mathematical knowledge and practice using digital technology 2014–2016—Award reference 9190) was funded by the Nuffield Foundation, but the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation. The research project was jointly directed by Alison Clark-Wilson and Celia Hoyles, UCL Institute of Education, London.
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Learning Practices Within Wenger’s Social Practice of Learning Model
Appendix: Learning Practices Within Wenger’s Social Practice of Learning Model
definition of a common enterprise in the process of pursuing it in concert with others;
mutual engagement in shared activities;
the accumulation of a history of shared experiences;
the production of a local regime of confidence;
the development of interpersonal relationships;
a sense of interacting trajectories that shape identities in relation to one another;
the management of boundaries;
the opening of peripheries that allow for various degrees of engagement.
recognising our experience in others, knowing what others are doing, being in someone else’s shoes;
defining a trajectory that connects what we are doing to an extended identity, seeing ourselves in new ways;
locating our engagement in broader systems in time and space, conceiving
sharing stories, explanations, descriptions;
opening access to distant practices through excursions and fleeting contacts—visiting, talking, observing, meeting;
assuming the meaningfulness of foreign artefacts and actions;
creating models, reifying patterns, producing representational artefacts;
documenting historical developments, events and transitions; reinterpreting histories and trajectories in new terms; using history to see the present as only one of many possibilities and the future as a number of possibilities;
generating scenarios, exploring other ways of doing what we are doing, other possible worlds and other identities.
investing energy in a directed way and creating a focus to coordinate this investment of energy;
negotiating perspectives, finding common ground;
imposing one’s view, using power and authority;
convincing inspiring, uniting;
defining broad visions and aspirations, proposing stories of identity;
devising proceduralisation, quantification and control structures that are portable (i.e. usable across boundaries);
walking boundaries, creating boundary practices, reconciling diverging perspectives .
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clark-Wilson, A. (2017). Transforming Mathematics Teaching with Digital Technologies: A Community of Practice Perspective. In: Marcus-Quinn, A., Hourigan, T. (eds) Handbook on Digital Learning for K-12 Schools. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33808-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33806-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33808-8