Introduction: The Internet and Geography

  • Aharon KellermanEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY)


This, introductory chapter will introduce the thesis of the book, its relevance and importance. It will further elaborate on the literature which has attempted so far to relate to the Internet as a geographical space. The chapter will also treat several Internet-related topics, such as digital gaps, sociality, and the territorial geography of the Internet.


Internet geography Geographic terminology Internet foundations Digital gaps Internet social spatiality Terrestrial geography of the internet 


  1. Adams, P. (1998). Network topologies and virtual place. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88, 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, P. C., & Ghose, R. (2003). The construction of a space between. Progress in Human Geography, 27, 414–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avidan, I., & Kellerman, A. (2004). Distance in the Internet by time and route: An empirical examination. Horizons (Contemporary Israeli Geography), 60–61, 77–88.Google Scholar
  4. Batty, M. (1997). Virtual geography. Futures, 29, 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benedikt, M. (1991). Cyberspace: Some proposals. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First steps (pp. 119–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cai, G., Hirtle, S., & Williams, J. (1999). Mapping the geography of cyberspace using telecommunications infrastructure information. The First international workshop on telegeoprocessing.
  7. Couclelis, H. (no date, probably 1997). The naïve geography of cyberspace.
  8. Crang, M., Crang, P., & May, J. (1999). Introduction. In M. Crang, P. Crang, & J. May (Eds.), Virtual geographies: Bodies, space and relations (pp. 1–13). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodge, M. (1999). The Geographies of cyberspace. University College London Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA), Working Paper Series 8.
  10. Dodge, M. (2001). Guest editorial. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2001). Mapping cyberspace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Earle, C., Mathewson, K., & Kenzer, M. S. (Eds.). (1996). Introduction back to basics: The virtues of key concepts in human geography. Concepts in human geography (pp. xi–xxv). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gorman, S. P., & Malecki, E. J. (2001). Fixed and fluid: Stability and change in the geography of the internet. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the association of American geographers, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Graham, M., de Sabbata, S., & Zook, M. A. (2015). Towards a study of information geographies: (Im)mutable augmentations and a mapping of the geographies of information. Geo: Geography and environment, 2, 88–105.Google Scholar
  16. Hargittai, E. (1999). Weaving the Western web: Explaining differences in Internet connectivity among OECD countries. Telecommunications Policy, 23, 701–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Holloway, S. I., & Valentine, G. (2001). Placing cyberspace: Processes of Americanization in British children’s use of the interne. Area, 33, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (2015). Aggregate data.
  20. Kellerman, A. (2002). The internet on earth: A geography of information. London and New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Kellerman, A. (2006). Personal mobilities. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kellerman, A. (2007). Cyberspace classification and cognition: Information and communications cyberspaces. Journal of Urban Technology, 14, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kellerman, A. (2014). The Internet as second action space. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Kellerman, A. (2016). Image spaces and the geography of internet screen-space. Geojournal, 81 (forthcoming), doi:  10.1007/s10708-015-9639-1.
  25. Kinsley, S. (2014). The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 38, 364–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirsch, S. (1995). The incredible shrinking world? Technology and the production of space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13, 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kline, D. (2013). Technologies of choice? ICTs, development, and the capabilities approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kwan, M.-P. (2001). Cyberspatial cognition and individual access to information: The behavioral foundation of cybergeography. Environment and Planning B, 28, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Lessig, L. (2001). The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  32. Li, F., Whalley, J., & Williams, H. (2001). Between physical and electronic spaces: The implications for organizations in the networked economy. Environment and Planning A, 33, 699–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Loo, B. P. Y. (2012). The E-society. New York: Nova.Google Scholar
  34. Malecki, E. J., & Moriset, B. (2008). The digital economy: Business organization, production processes and regional developments. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Meishar-Tal, H. (2006). The Internet and social dynamics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Geography, University of Haifa (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  36. Merrifield, A. (1993). Place and space: A Lefebvrian reconciliation. Transactions of the British Institute of Geographers, 18, 516–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paterson, M. (2006). Feel the presence: Technologies of touch and distance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 691–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Péruch, P., Gaunet, F., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Loomis, J. (2000). Understanding and learning virtual spaces. In R. Kitchin & S. Freundschuh (Eds.), Cognitive mapping: Past, present, and future (pp. 108–115). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Pickles, J. (2004). A History of spaces: Cartographic reason, mapping and the geo-coded world. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Statista, The Statistics Portal. (2015a). Share of internet users in Germany in May 2015, by age and gender.
  42. Statista, The Statistics Portal. (2015b). Distribution of internet users in Japan as of May 2015, by age group and gender.
  43. Tranos, E. (2013). The geography of the internet: Cities, regions and internet infrastructure in Europe. Northampton, MA: Edward Edgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ugarte, P. P. (2015). Top 10 most gender equal countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Economic Forum Agenda.
  45. Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Urry, J. (2003). Global complexity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  47. W3Techs. (2015). Usage of contents languages for websites.
  48. Wang, Y., Lai, P., & Sui, D. (2003). Mapping the Internet using GIS: The death of distance hypothesis revisited. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5, 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Warf, B. (Ed.). (2006). Introduction. Encyclopedia of human geography (pp. xxv–xxviii). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  50. Warf, B. (2009). Diverse spatialities of the Latin American and Caribbean Internet. Journal of Latin American geography, 8, 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Warf, B. (2013). Global geographies of the internet. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Web Hosting. (2016). Hosting stats by country.
  53. Weinberger, D. (2002). Small pieces loosely joined {a unified theory of the web}. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations