Abstract
Public administrations and cities increasingly use modern information and communication technologies to enhance their processes and services. As the fabric of cities becomes more complex, and collaboration and participation are emphasized, citizens thus need to be empowered to find available engagement opportunities and citizens need to identify those that they want to engage with. We report on the use of an online information platform that offered citizen engagement opportunities in a traditional textual form and via an interactive geo-visualization. The platform was deployed in a real-world study and integral component in a campaign to raise volunteer engagement in a medium-sized German city. We first introduce our approach to letting citizens explore engagement opportunities and follow up with an analysis of how people used the platform. Subsequently, evidence is presented and discussed that spatial visualization and interaction is relevant for informing citizens online. Since we released the information platform as open source, others can easily benefit from our insights.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Jankowski P, Keim D, Kraak MJ, MacEachren A, Wrobel S (2007) Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: setting the research agenda. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21(8):839–857
Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Demsar U, Dransch D, Dykes J, Fabrikant SI, Jern M, Kraak MJ, Schumann H, Tominski C (2010) Space, time and visual analytics. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(10):1577–1600
Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst planners 35(4):216–224
Bailey K, Grossardt T (2010) Toward structured public involvement: justice, geography and collaborative geospatial/geovisual decision support systems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100(1):57–86
Cai G, Yu B (2009) Spatial annotation technology for public deliberation. Trans GIS 13(1):123–146
Carpini MXD, Cook FL, Jacobs LR (2004) Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature. Ann Rev Polit Sci 7(1):315–344
Connor D (1988) A new ladder of citizen participation. Nat Civic Rev 77(3):249–257
Crampton JW (2009) Cartography: maps 2.0. Prog Hum Geogr 33(1):91–100
Crivellaro C, Comber R, Dade-Robertson M, Bowen SJ, Wright PC, Olivier P (2015) Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ’15. ACM Press, New York, pp 2853–2862
Dunn CE (2007) Participatory GIS a people’s GIS? Prog Hum Geogr 31(5):616–637
Elwood S (2006a) Beyond cooptation or resistance: urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 96(2):323–341
Elwood S (2006b) Critical issues in participatory GIS: deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Trans GIS 10(5):693–708
Elwood S, Leszczynski A (2013) New spatial media, new knowledge politics. Trans Inst Br Geogr 38(4):544–559
Fechner T, Kray C (2014) Geo-referenced open data and augmented interactive geo-visualizations as catalysts for citizen engagement. eJ eDemocracy Open Gov 6(1):14–35
Fechner T, Wilhelm D, Kray C (2015) Ethermap—real-time collaborative map editing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ’15. ACM Press, New York, pp 3583–3592
Ferro E, Caroleo B, Leo M (2013) The role of ICT in smart cities governance. In: Parycek P, Edelmann N (eds) Proceedings of 13th international conference for E-democracy and open government. Donau-Universität Krems, pp 133–145
Gaventa J, Barrett G (2010) So what difference does it make? Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. IDS Working Pap 2010(347):01–72
Hecht BJ, Gergle D (2010) On the “localness” of user-generated content. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work—CSCW ’10. ACM Press, New York, pp 229–232
Hopfer S, MacEachren AM (2007) Leveraging the potential of geospatial annotations for collaboration: a communication theory perspective. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21(8):921–934
Kessler C, Rinner C, Raubal M (2005) An argumentation map prototype to support decision-making in spatial planning. Proc AGILE 5:26–28
Krek A (2005) Rational ignorance of the citizens in public participatory planning. 10th symposium on Information-and communication technologies (ICT) in urban planning and spatial development and impacts of ICT on physical space, CORP 5
Maier-Rabler U, Huber S (2011) Open: the changing relation between citizens, public administration, and political authority. eJ eDemocracy Open Gov 3(2):182–191
McCall MK, Dunn CE (2012) Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: fulfilling the criteria for good governance? Geoforum 43(1):81–94
Obermeyer N (1998) The evolution of public participation GIS. Cartography Geogr Inf Syst 25(2):65–66
Rinner C (1999) Argumaps for spatial planning. In: Laurini R (ed) Proceedings of teleGeo’99. First international workshop on telegeoprocessing, Lyon, France, pp 95–102
Rowe G, Frewer LF (2005) A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum values 30(2):251–290
Sidlar CL, Rinner C (2009) Utility assessment of a map-based online geo-collaboration tool. J Environ Manage 90(6):2020–2026
Sieber R (2006) Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 96(3):491–507
Steinmann R, Krek A, Blasche T (2005) Can online map-based applications improve citizen participation? In: Böhlen M, Gamper J, Polasek W, Wimmer MA (eds) E-government: towards electronic democracy, vol 3416., Lecture notes in computer scienceSpringer, Heidelberg
Sui DZ, Goodchild M (2011) The convergence of GIS and social media: challenges for GIScience. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(11):1737–1748
Taylor AS, Lindley S, Regan T, Sweeney D, Vlachokyriakos V, Grainger L, Lingel J (2015) Data-in-place: thinking through the relations between data and community. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ’15. ACM Press, New York, pp 2863–2872
Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American
Wright DR (2009) Towards fair world maps? A journey in our unfair world. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ 18(1):1–4
Yu H, Robinson DG (2012) The new ambiguity of “open government”. SSRN Electron J 59:178–208
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Stiftung Bürger für Münster, all participating NGOs and other partners that helped in the project 1000 Stunden für Münster. We give thanks to Gerald Pape, as the implementation of the information portal was based on his M.Sc. Thesis. The research reported here was partly funded by con terra GmbH.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fechner, T., Kray, C. (2016). Presenting Citizen Engagement Opportunities Online: The Relevancy of Spatial Visualization. In: Sarjakoski, T., Santos, M., Sarjakoski, L. (eds) Geospatial Data in a Changing World. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33783-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33783-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33782-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33783-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)