Advertisement

For the Benefit of Humanity: Values in Micro, Meso, Macro, and Meta Levels in Engineering

  • Byron NewberryEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 23)

Abstract

The goal of this essay is to sketch a taxonomic outline of values within engineering. Any desire to understand the technology-society relationship would presumably benefit from investigating the values that inform engineering work, since that work is largely proximate to the production of technologies. More specifically, an understanding of the values constitutive of and operating within engineering at a multitude of levels can potentially aid in understanding how engineers go from thought to thing in the processes of design and manufacture. I propose a four-level hierarchy of engineering values, at the micro, meso, macro, and meta levels. Values at the micro level correspond to those values operative at the level of specific, detailed engineering tasks. Meso level values are those values operative in the process of translating functional descriptions of designs into structural descriptions – that is, at the creative level of engineering design. At the macro-level, I refer to the values operative for engineers at the economic/organizational level – that is, at the level at which engineers intersect heavily with non-technical interests. Finally, the meta level comprises overarching values that presumably inform all of engineering work.

Keywords

Engineering values Engineering design Engineering organizations Engineering profession 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank the following students who participated in conducting interviews of engineers during the spring semester of 2014. At the time they were undergraduate Mechanical Engineering or Electrical and Computer Engineering majors at Baylor University, though now all have graduated: Zach Bitting, Andrew Hoeckel, Courtney Kimutis, Peyton Lundsford, and Alexa Wilde.

References

  1. Auyang, S. (2004). Engineering: An endless frontier. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boston, W., Varnholt, H., & Sloat, S. (2015, December 10). Volkswagen blames ‘chain of mistakes’ for emissions scandal. The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/vw-shares-up-ahead-of-emissions-findings-1449740759. Accessed 10 Dec 2015.
  3. Bottger, P. (2010, July 1). The genius of Nicolas Hayek. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/2010/07/01/nicolas-hayek-swatch-swiss-leadership-managing-watch.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2016.
  4. Bucciarelli, L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, M. (1997). Is there a profession of engineering? Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, M. (1998). Thinking like an engineer: Studies in the ethics of a profession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Donzé, P.-Y. (2014). A business history of the swatch group: The rebirth of Swiss watchmaking and the globalization of the luxury industry. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dopfer, K., Foster, J., & Potts, J. (2004). Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Downey, G., Lucena, J., & Mitcham, C. (1987). Engineering ethics and identity: Emerging initiatives in comparative perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Florman, S. (1987). The civilized engineer. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hansson, S. O. (2013). Valuation of artefacts and the normativity of technology. In M. J. de Vries, S. O. Hansson, & A. Meijers (Eds.), Norms in technology (pp. 103–118). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansson, S. O., Meijers, A., & de Vries, M. J. (2013). Introduction. In M. J. de Vries, S. O. Hansson, & A. Meijers (Eds.), Norms in technology (pp. 1–11). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koen, B. V. (2003). Discussion of the method: Conducting the engineer’s approach to problem solving. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kroes, P. (2010). Engineering and the dual nature of technical artefacts. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marx, L. (1987). Does improved technology mean progress? Tech Rev, 90(1), 33–41.Google Scholar
  16. Newberry, B. (2015). Efficiency animals: Efficiency as an engineering value. In S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, & B. Newberry (Eds.), Engineering identities, epistemologies and values: Engineering education and practice in context (Vol. II, pp. 199–214). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nicholls, J. (1988). Leadership in organisations: Meta, macro and micro. European Management Journal, 6(1), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Petroski, H. (1985). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. van de Poel, I. (2013). Translating values into design requirements. In D. P. Michelfelder, N. McCarthy, & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process (pp. 253–266). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. van de Poel, I. (2015). Values in engineering and technology. In W. J. Gonzalez (Ed.), New perspectives on technology, values, and ethics: Theoretical and practical (Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science, Vol. 315, pp. 29–46). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  22. Weinberg, A. M. (1970). The axiology of science: The urgent question of scientific priorities has helped to promote a growing concern with value in science. American Scientist, 58(6), 612–617.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Baylor UniversityWacoUSA

Personalised recommendations