Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward an Architecture of the Language–Emotion Interface

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Language and Cognitive Structures of Emotion

  • 554 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to uncover the operations at the ‘interface’ connecting language to emotive structures. So far what has been projected from the ongoing discussion on the nature of emotive intensionality is that emotion is a relation that associates intensional structures from language with patterns of cognitive structures of emotive expressions, or vice versa. This has been summed up in the form The Correspondence Theorem. An informal proof will be provided later in this chapter. Therefore, this chapter will substantiate the theorem in great depth, sketching in a precise manner the nature of operations that occur at the interface that connects the domain of language to that of emotion. The theorem will help lay out a detailed account of what happens at the interface when language liaises with emotion. Insights into the nature of operations at the language–emotion interface will be extrapolated to a development of the architecture of that interface. Once the form of this architecture is specified and spelt out in sufficient details, relevant generalizations on the relation between language and other cognitive domains can also be indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term ‘computational’ here involves references to computations, and hence it may lead one to arrive at the conclusion that computations run in the cognitive system of the interface between language and emotion. Nothing of this sort is implied here. That is, no computational assumption about the nature of the operations running at the interface between language and emotion regarded as cognitive domains is made here. Rather, the terms ‘computational’ and ‘computation’ are used in their trivial sense attaching to the calculation of certain quantitative values. This is the intended interpretation which does not therefore make any commitment as to whether computations run in the mind. As a matter of fact, the idea that computations are performed by the language faculty in the mind (see Chomsky 1995) has been demonstrated to be fundamentally flawed and deeply misguided by Mondal (2014b).

  2. 2.

    This has been taken from Annie (1986). But the categorization of emotive predicates presented here has significant differences from the classification of emotive predicates Annie (1986) has come up with.

References

  • Annie, C. (1986). The semantics of emotive predicates. BA Project, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(1), 28–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, R., & Bloom, L. (1989). Talking with feeling: Integrating affective and linguistic expression in early language development. Cognition and Emotion, 3(4), 313–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, M. (1999). How much space gets into language? In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 31–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. (1993). The transition from infancy to language: Acquiring the power of expression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. (1988). The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In J. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 73–101). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind: Massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charland, L. C. (1995). Emotion as a natural kind: Towards a computational foundation for emotion theory. Philosophical Psychology, 8(1): 59–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. A. (2010). Relations of homology between higher cognitive emotions and basic emotions. Biology and Philosophy, 25, 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, R. (2006). Against emotional modularity. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 36, 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, P., Chan, A. W., Peelan, M., Dodds, C., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). Domain specificity in visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1453–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumouchel, P. (2006). Biological modules and emotions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 36, 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3/4), 163–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, B., & Russell, J. A. (1984). Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(3), 464–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobet, F. (2005). Modularity and chunking. In W. Callebaut & D. R. Gutman (Eds.), Modularity: Understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems (pp. 331–352). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P., & Kiparsky, C. (1971). Fact. In D. D. Steinberg & L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (pp. 345–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiese, M. (2011). Embodiment, emotion and cognition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, P. (2012). Can internalism and externalism be reconciled in a biological epistemology of language? Biosemiotics, 5, 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, P. (2014a). How does the faculty of language relate to rules, axioms and constraints? Pragmatics and Cognition, 21(2), 270–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, P. (2014b). Language, mind and computation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morvan, L. P. (2005). Intentionality: Transparent, translucent and opaque. Journal of Philosophical Research, 30, 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. (2006). Emotions are not modules. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 36, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuren, P. A. M. (2006). The natural logic of language and cognition. Pragmatics, 16(1), 103–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T., & Cooper, R. (2011). The organization of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, D. (2008). A new view of language, emotion and the brain. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42, 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H., Harris, P., Banerjee, M., & Sinclair, A. (1995). Early understanding of emotion: Evidence from natural language. Cognition and Emotion, 9(2–3), 117–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, E. (1993). On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 149–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinck, A., & Newen, A. (2008). Classifying emotion: A developmental account. Synthese, 161, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Medak, Telangana, India

    Prakash Mondal

Authors
  1. Prakash Mondal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mondal, P. (2016). Toward an Architecture of the Language–Emotion Interface. In: Language and Cognitive Structures of Emotion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33690-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33690-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33689-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33690-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation