Skip to main content

Olfactory Objects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy of Olfactory Perception
  • 357 Accesses

Abstract

Perceptual qualities can be arranged in time and space. Therefore, it usually does not appear to us as if we perceive perceptual qualities. Instead, we seem to perceive objects and their properties. Based on this introspective evidence, object-based accounts of perception have been developed. In “Olfactory Objects”, Keller points out that olfactory perception has no spatial structure. He argues that therefore the notion of perceptual objects cannot be applied to olfaction; the common criteria for objecthood in vision fail to pick out olfactory objects. Odor perception is not the perception of objects. Instead, Keller endorses the view proposed by Clare Batty that in olfaction perceptual properties are “object-less”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aznar, M., López, R., et al. (2001). Identification and quantification of impact odorants of aged red wines from Rioja. GC-olfactometry, quantitative GC-MS, and odor evaluation of HPLC fractions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49(6), 2924–2929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwich, A.-S. (2014). A sense so rare: Measuring olfactory experiences and making a case for a process perspective on sensory perception. Biological Theory, 9(3), 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, C. (2010). A representational account of olfactory experience. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 40(4), 511–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, C. (2011). Smelling lessons. Philosophical Studies, 153, 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, C. (2014). The illusion confusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizley, J. K., & Cohen, Y. E. (2013). The what, where and how of auditory-object perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(10), 693–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blauert, J. (1997). Spatial hearing: The psychophysics of human sound localization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budek, T., & Farkas, K. (2014). Which causes of an experience are also objects of the experience? In B. Brogaard (Ed.), Does perception have content? (pp. 351–369). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, F. (2014). Olfactory objects. Disputatio, 6(38), 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, J. B., & Seeley, W. P. (2014). Olfaction, valuation, and action: Reorienting perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,(299), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen, C., Howes, D., et al. (1994). Aroma: The cultural history of smell. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croy, I., Schulz, M., et al. (2014). Human olfactory lateralization requires trigeminal activation. NeuroImage, 98, 289–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, P. (2000). Psychophysical and behavioral characteristics of olfactory adaptation. Chemical Senses, 25(4), 487–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frasnelli, J., Charbonneau, G., et al. (2008). Odor localization and sniffing. Chemical Senses, 34(2), 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagliardo, A. (2013). Forty years of olfactory navigation in birds. Journal of Experimental Biology, 216(12), 2165–2171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, T. D., & Warren, J. D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 887–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2002/1950). The origin of the work of art. In J. Young and K. Haynes (Eds.), Off the beaten track. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. (1977). Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L. F., Arter, J., et al. (2015). Olfactory orientation and navigation in humans. PLoS One, 10(6), e0129387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleemann, A. M., Albrecht, J., et al. (2009). Trigeminal perception is necessary to localize odors. Physiology & Behavior, 97(3–4), 401–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köster, E. P. (2002). The specific characteristics of the sense of smell. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition (pp. 27–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Köster, E. P., Møller, P., et al. (2014). A “Misfit” theory of spontaneous conscious odor perception (MITSCOP): Reflections on the role and function of odor memory in everyday life. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, 80(1–2), 97–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. G. (2000). The slighting of smell. In N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Of minds and molecules: New philosophical perspectives on chemistry (pp. 273–289). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. G. (2014a). The intentionality of smell. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. G. (2014b). What does vision represent? In B. Brogaard (Ed.), Does perception have content? (pp. 311–328). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthen, M. (2005). Seeing, doing, and knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthen, M. (2010). On the diversity of auditory objects. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 63–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nudds, M. (2010). What are auditory objects? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan, C. (2008). Object perception: Vision and audition. Philosophy Compass, 3, 803–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan, C. (2014). Auditory perception. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/perception-auditory/

  • Ohloff, G. (1994). Scent and fragrances: The fascination of odors and their chemical perspectives. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, J. K. (2014). Time to smell: A cascade model of human olfactory perception based on response-time (RT) measurement. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J., Anand, T., et al. (2005). Brain mechanisms for extracting spatial information from smell. Neuron, 47(4), 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J., Craven, B., et al. (2007). Mechanisms of scent-tracking in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 10(1), 27–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radil, T., & Wysocki, C. J. (1998). Spatiotemporal masking in pure olfaction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 855, 641–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. (2006). Which properties are represented in perception? In T. Szabó Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual experience (pp. 481–503). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J. (2009). Phenomenal and access consciousness in olfaction. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(4), 1004–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J. (2014). Object concepts in the chemical senses. Cognitive Science, 38(7), 1360–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J., & Wilson, D. A. (2007). Odour perception: An object-recognition approach. Perception, 36, 1821–1833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tye, M. (1995). Ten problems of consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varendi, H., & Porter, R. H. (2001). Breast odour as the only maternal stimulus elicits crawling towards the odour source. Acta Paediatrica, 90(4), 372–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varendi, H., Porter, R. H., et al. (1994). Does the newborn baby find the nipple by smell. Lancet, 344(8928), 989–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Békésy, G. (1964). Olfactory analogue to directional hearing. Journal of Applied Physiology, 19(3), 369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallraff, H. G., & Andreae, M. O. (2000). Spatial gradients in ratios of atmospheric trace gases: A study stimulated by experiments on bird navigation. Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 52(4), 1138–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissburg, M. J. (2000). The fluid dynamical context of chemosensory behavior. Biological Bulletin, 198(2), 188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., & Stevenson, R. J. (2006). Learning to smell: Olfactory perception from neurobiology to behavior. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N. (2010). An odor is not worth a thousand words: From multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, B. D. (2011). Olfaction: Smelling the content of consciousness. Philosophy. New York, City University of New York. PhD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keller, A. (2016). Olfactory Objects. In: Philosophy of Olfactory Perception. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33645-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics