Land-Use Competition in the South American Chaco

  • Matthias BaumannEmail author
  • María Piquer-Rodríguez
  • Verena Fehlenberg
  • Gregorio Gavier Pizarro
  • Tobias Kuemmerle
Part of the Human-Environment Interactions book series (HUEN, volume 6)


The dry forests of the Chaco in South America are under great land conversion pressure, mostly for establishing pastures and soybean fields. Taking recent estimates into account, the rates at which forests are disappearing are similar to those of the Amazon, but compared to the Amazon, the Chaco remains fairly understudied. The land transformations during the past decades went along with a substantial change in the type of actors dominating the Chaco landscape. In this chapter, we discuss the land changes in the Chaco during the past 30 years with emphasis on the actors driving these changes, as outlined in the conceptual chapter of this book section. In the Chaco, it appears that the competition over land is a competition in which the actors are endowed with varying degrees of power, resulting in highly unbalanced competition. This chapter highlights these differences and discusses the potential role of the state as an actor in the competition for land that may help to slow down deforestation in the area and guide the Chaco toward more sustainable land-use futures.


Transformation Proximate causes Underlying drivers Deforestation 


  1. Altrichter, M., & Basurto, X. (2008). Effects of land privatisation on the use of common-pool resources of varying mobility in the Argentine Chaco.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez Kalverkamp, M. (2013). Im Reich der Sojabohne: Strukturwandel in der Landwirtschaft des Cono Sur am Beispiel Argentiniens. Heinrich-Boell-Stiftung, Available in
  3. Baumann, M., Gasparri, I., Piquer-Rodríguez, M., Gavier-Pizarro, G. I., Griffiths, P., Hostert, P., Kuemmerle, T. et al. (in review-a). Carbon emissions from deforestation and agricultural intensification in the Chaco.Google Scholar
  4. Baumann, M., Israel, C., Piquer-Rodríguez, M., Gavier-Pizarro, G. I., Volante, J. N., & Kuemmerle, T. (in review-b). Deforestation and cattle expansion in the Paraguaya Chaco 1987–2012.Google Scholar
  5. Bertello, F. (2008). Cada vez más productores argentinos van a sembrar soja a Uruguay. Newspaper article in from March 4, 2008. [Available in].
  6. Börner, J., Wunder, S., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Tito, M. R., Pereira, L., & Nascimento, N. (2010). Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity implications. Ecological Economics, 69, 1272–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, A. D., Foguet, M. J., García Moritán, M., & Maliya, S. (2010). Bañado de la Estrella (p. 109). Dinamica fluvial de un espacio compartido: Fundación Pro-Yungas, Tucuman, Argentina.Google Scholar
  8. Bucher, E. H., & Huszar, P. C. (1999). Sustainable management of the Gran Chaco of South America: Ecological promise and economic constraints. Journal of Environmental Management, 57, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burghardt, P. (2014). Der Tod kommt mit dem Wind. Sueddeutsche Zeitung.
  10. Caldas, M. M., Goodin, D., Sherwood, S., Campos Krauer, J. M., & Wisely, S. M. (2015). Land-cover change in the Paraguayan Chaco: 2000–2011. Journal of Land Use Science, 10, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dana, L.-P., & Dana, T. E. (2007). Collective entrepreneurship in a mennonite community in Paraguay. Latin American Business Review, 8, 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diaz-Zorita, M., Duarte, G. A., & Grove, J. H. (2002). A review of no-till systems and soil management for sustainable crop production in the subhumid and semiarid Pampas of Argentina. Soil & Tillage Research, 65, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAOSTAT 2015. FAOSTAT Database [Online]. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Available in [Accessed February 16, 2015].
  14. Fatecha, A. (1989). Present and potential area for agricultural use in the arid Chaco of Paraguay. In M. Hamp & M. A. Tiefert (Eds.), Agricultural production under semi-arid conditions with special reference to the Paraguayan Chaco: Strategies (p. 284). Food and Agriculture Development Centre.Google Scholar
  15. Fehlenberg, V. (2015). Understanding proximate drivers of deforestation in the Gran Chaco: Soybean expansion versus cattle ranching. MSc-Thesis (p. 51). Berlin: Geography Department, Humboldt-University Berlin.Google Scholar
  16. Gasparri, N. I., Grau, H. R., & Manghi, E. (2008). Carbon pools and emissions from deforestation in extra-tropical forests of Northern Argentina between 1900 and 2005. Ecosystems, 11, 1247–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gasparri, N. I., & le Polain de Waroux, Y. (2014). The coupling of South American soybean and cattle production frontiers: New challenges for conservation policy and land change science. Conservation Letters, 8, 290–298.Google Scholar
  18. Gavier-Pizarro, G. I., Calamari, N. C., Thompson, J. J., Canavelli, S. B., Solari, L. M., Decarre, J., et al. (2012). Expansion and intensification of row crop agriculture in the Pampas and Espinal of Argentina can reduce ecosystem service provision by changing avian density. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 154, 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldfarb, L., & Zoomers, A. (2013). The drivers behind the rapid expansion of genetically modified soya production into the Chaco region of Argentina. In Z. Fang (Ed.), Biofuels—Economy, environment and sustainability (pp. 73–95). InTech Publisher.Google Scholar
  20. Gonzales, D. (2013). Uruguayos ya explotan el 12, 5 % de las tierras ganaderas en Paraguay. Edicion Impresa (February 12, 2013).Google Scholar
  21. Graesser, J., Aide, M., Grau, R., & Ramankutty, N. (2015). Cropland/pastureland dynamics and the slowdown of deforestation in Latin America. Environmental Research Letters, 10, 034017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grau, H. R., Gasparri, N. I., & Aide, T. M. (2005). Agriculture expansion and deforestation in seasonally dry forests of North-West Argentina. Environmental Conservation, 32, 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gurtler, R. E., Kitron, U., Cecere, M. C., Segura, E. L., & Cohen, J. E. (2007). Sustainable vector control and management of Chagas disease in the Gran Chaco, Argentina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 16194–16199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., et al. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342, 850–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Houghton, R. A. (2003). Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 55, 378–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Houghton, R. A., & Hackler, J. L. (2001). Carbon flux to the atmosphere from land-use changes: 1850–1990 (p. 74). Washington D.C.: Environmental Science Division, U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  27. Huang, C. Q., Kim, S., Altstatt, A., Townshend, J. R. G., Davis, P., Song, K., et al. (2007). Rapid loss of Paraguay’s Atlantic forest and the status of protected areas—A landsat assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 106, 460–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Le Polain de Waroux, Y., Garrett, R. D., Heilmayr, R., & Lambin, E. F. (in review). A rush to the margins: Impacts of land use policies on corporate investments in agriculture in the Gran Chaco.Google Scholar
  29. Leguizamon, A. (2014). Modifying Argentina: GM soy and socio-environmental change. Geoforum, 53, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lemaire, G., Franzluebbers, A., Carvalho, P. C. D., & Dedieu, B. (2014). Integrated crop-livestock systems: Strategies to achieve synergy between agricultural production and environmental quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 190, 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ley de Proteccion ambiental de Bosques nativos (2007). Ley No 26331, primera seccion. Argentina, 3pags.; Available in–139999/136125/norma.htm.
  32. Manuel-Navarrete, D., Gallopín, G., Blanco, M., Díaz-Zorita, M., Ferraro, D., Herzer, H., et al. (2009). Multi-causal and integrated assessment of sustainability: The case of agriculturization in the Argentine Pampas. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11, 621–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nepstad, D., Soares-Filho, B. S., Merry, F., Lima, A., Moutinho, P., Carter, J., et al. (2009). The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science, 326, 1350–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newell, P. (2009). Bio-Hegemony: the political economy of agricultural biotechnology in Argentina. Journal of Latin American Studies, 41, 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., et al. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the worlds: A new map of life on Earth. BioScience, 51, 933–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piquer-Rodríguez, M., Torella, S., Gavier-Pizarro, G., Volante, J., Somma, D., Ginzburg, R., Kuemmerle, T. et al. (2015). Effects of past and future land conversions on forest connectivity in the Argentine Chaco. Landscape Ecology, 1–17.Google Scholar
  37. Prado, D. E. (1993). What is the gran Chaco vegetation in South America? I. A review: contribution to the study of flora and vegetation of the Chaco, V. Candollea, 48, 145–172.Google Scholar
  38. Ramirez, E. G., & Laneri, J. L. (1989). Fodder and feeding of cattle in the Paraguayan Chaco. In M. Hamp, & M. A. Tiefert (Eds.) Agricultural production under semi-arid conditions with special reference to the Paraguayan Chaco: Strategies and appropriate technologies (pp. 139–148). DSE Feladelfing.Google Scholar
  39. Reenberg, A., & Fenger, N. A. (2011). Globalizing land use transitions: the soybean acceleration. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 111, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Santarcángelo, J. E., & Fal, J. (2009). Producción y rentabilidad en la ganadería Argentina: 1980–2006. Mundo agrario, 10.Google Scholar
  41. Sili, M., & Soumoulou, L. (2011). The issue of land in Argentina. Conflicts and dynamics of use, holdings and concentration. Report, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), 12p.Google Scholar
  42. Vallejos, M., Volante, J. N., Mosciaro, M. J., Vale, L. M., Bustamante, M. L., Paruelo, J. M. et al. (2015). Transformation dynamics of the natural cover in the dry Chaco ecoregion: A plot level geo-database from 1976–2012. Journal of Arid Environments.Google Scholar
  43. Vazquez, F. (2013). Geografia humana del Chaco paraguayo—Transformaciones territoriales y desarollo regional. Asuncion: Ediciones ADEPO.Google Scholar
  44. Wendland, K. J., Honzák, M., Portela, R., Vitale, B., Rubinoff, S., & Randrianarisoa, J. (2010). Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: Opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar. Ecological Economics, 69, 2093–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. World Wildlife Fund (2015). Soy and deforestation—The Gran Chaco. [last access: March 16, 2015].
  46. Wunder, S. (2007). The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology, 21, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Baumann
    • 1
    Email author
  • María Piquer-Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Verena Fehlenberg
    • 1
  • Gregorio Gavier Pizarro
    • 2
  • Tobias Kuemmerle
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Geography DepartmentHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Grupo de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Gestión Ambiental, Instituto de Recursos Biológicos (CIRN), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), CNIAINTANicolas Repetto y De los ReserosBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Integrative Research Institute Transformations of Human-Environment Systems (IRI Thesys)Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations