Comparison of the Intrusion Detection System Rules in Relation with the SCADA Systems
- 705 Downloads
Increased interconnectivity, interoperability and complexity of communication in Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (further only SCADA) systems, resulted in increasing efficiency of industrial processes. However, the recently isolated SCADA systems are considered as the targets of considerable number of cyber-attacks. Because of this, the SCADA cyber-security is under constant pressure. In this article we examine suitability of current state signature based Intrusion Detection System (further only IDS) in SCADA systems. Therefore, we deeply evaluate the Snort and the Quickdraw rules based on signatures in order to specify their relations to SCADA cyber security. We report the results of the study comprising more than two hundred rules.
KeywordsCyber security Intrusion detection system Industrial control system Signature
This work was founded by the Internal Grant Agency (IGA/FAI/2016/014) and supported by the project ev. no. VI20152019049 “RESILIENCE 2015:RESILIENCE 2015: Dynamic Resilience Evaluation of Interrelated Critical Infrastructure Subsystems” supported by the Ministry of the Interior Security Research Programme of the Czech Republic in the years 2015–2020. Moreover, this work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic within the National Sustainability Programme project No. LO1303 (MSMT-7778/2014) and also by the European Regional Development Fund under the project CEBIA-Tech No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0089.
- 1.Verba, J., Milvich, M.: Idaho National Laboratory Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Intrusion Detection System (SCADA IDS). In: IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, pp. 469–473 (2008)Google Scholar
- 2.Stouffer, K., Falco, J., Scarfone, K.: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. National Institute of Standards and Technology. http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-82/SP800-82-final.pdf (2011) [cit. 2015-12-01]
- 3.Macaulay, T., Singer, B.: Cybersecurity for industrial control systems: SCADA, DCS, PLC, HMI, and SIS, 193 pp. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2012). ISBN: 14-398-0196-7Google Scholar
- 4.Fisk, M., Varghese, G.: Fast content-based packet handling for intrusion detection. Los Alamos National Lab, NM Computing Communications and Networking Div (2001)Google Scholar
- 5.Scarfone, K., Mell, P.: Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS): Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (2007) [cit. 2015-12-03]Google Scholar
- 6.Pritika, M.E.H.R.A.: A brief study and comparison of snort and bro open source network intrusion detection systems. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 1(6), 383–386 (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Shah, S.N., Singh, Ms.P.: Signature-based network intrusion detection system using SNORT and WINPCAP. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (ESRSA Publications) (2012)Google Scholar
- 8.The Snort Intrusion Detection System: https://www.snort.org/ (2015)
<SimplePara><Emphasis Type="Bold">Open Access</Emphasis> This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. </SimplePara> <SimplePara>The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.</SimplePara>