Hermeneutics and Truth: From Alētheia to Attestation

  • Sebastian PurcellEmail author
Part of the Contributions to Hermeneutics book series (CONT HERMEN, volume 2)


This essay aims to correct a prevalent misconception about Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics, which understands it to support a conception of human understanding as finite as Heidegger did, but in a more “conceptually conservative” way. The result is that Ricoeur’s work is viewed as incapable of addressing the most pressing problems in contemporary Continental metaphysics. In response, it is argued that Ricoeur is in fact the first to develop an infinite hermeneutics, which develops Heidegger’s sense of hermeneutics significantly. This position is demonstrated by tracing the itinerary from Heidegger’s account of aletheia to Ricoeur’s account of attestation. The conclusion, then, not only clears Ricoeur of the stated charges, but also presents a more viable path for the future of hermeneutics.


Aletheia Attestation Events Heidegger Truth 


  1. Aristotle. 1989. Metaphysics: Books I-IX. Trans. Hugh Tredennick. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Badiou, Alain. 2005. Being and event. Trans. Oliver Feltham. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  3. Badiou, Alain. 2006. The subject supposed to be a christian: On Paul Ricoeur’s memory, history, forgetting. Trans. Natalie Doyle and Alberto Toscano, The Bible and critical theory 2(3): 1–27.Google Scholar
  4. Badiou, Alain. 2008a. Conditions. Trans. Steven Corcoran. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  5. Badiou, Alain. 2008b. Number and numbers. Trans. Robin Mackay. New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Badiou, Alain. 2009. Logics of worlds. Trans. Alberto Toscano. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  7. Caputo, John. 1987. Radical hermeneutics: Repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Caputo, John. 2000. More radical hermeneutics: On not knowing who we are. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Caputo, John. 2007. The hyperbolization of phenomenology: Two possibilities for religion in recent continental philosophy. In Counter-experiences: Reading Jean-Luc Marion, ed. Hart Kevin. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  10. Caputo, John. 2010. The possibility of the impossible: A response to Richard Kearney. In Cross and Khora: Deconstruction and Christianity in the work of John D. Caputo, ed. N. Deroo and M. Zlomiac, 140–150. Eugene: Pickwick Press.Google Scholar
  11. Caputo, John. 2011. God, perhaps: The diacritical hermeneutics of God in the work of Richard Kearney. Philosophy today (Supplement): 56–65.Google Scholar
  12. Harr, Michel. 1993. Heidegger and the essence of man. Trans. William McNeill. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, Martin. 1972. Gesamtausgabe, Band 2, Sein und Zeit. Tübigen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. English Edition: Heidegger, Martin, 1996. Being and Time (trans. Joan Stambaugh). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, Martin. 1976. Gesamtausgabe, Band 9, “Vom Wesen des Grundes,” in Wegemarken Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. English Edition: Heidegger, Martin. 1998. “On the Essence of Ground,” in Pathmarks (ed. and trans. William McNeill). New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Heidegger, Martin. 1989. Gesamtausgabe, Band 65, Beiträge Zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis). Frankfurt Am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. English Edition: Heidegger, Martin. 1999. Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning) (trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly). Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heidegger, Martin. 2001. Zollikon seminars: Protocols, conversations, letters. Trans. Franz Mayr and Richard Askay. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Idhe, Don. 1993. Postphenomenlogy: Essays in the postmodern context. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Idhe, Don. 1998. Expanding hermeneutics: Visualism in science. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Idhe, Don. 2002. Bodies in technology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Janicaud, Dominique. 2000. The Theological Turn of French Phenomenology. In Phenomenology and the “Theological Turn”: The French Debate, 16–103. Trans. Bernard G. Prusak. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kearney, Richard. 2001. The God who may be: A hermeneutics of religion. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kearney, Richard. 2003. Strangers, Gods, and monsters: Interpreting otherness. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kearney, Richard. 2010. Anatheism: Returning to God after God. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Laudan, Larry. 1984. Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lawlor, Leonard. 2004. Verendlichung (Finitization): The overcoming of metaphysics of life, Philosophy Today (Winter): 399–412.Google Scholar
  26. Richardson, William. 2003. Heidegger: Through phenomenology to thought. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ricoeur, Paul. 1967. Symbolism of evil. Trans. Emerson Buchanan. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ricoeur, Paul. 1974. The conflict of interpretations, ed. Don Ihde. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ricoeur, Paul. 1986. Fallible man. Trans. Charles A. Kelbley. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ricoeur, Paul. 1992. Oneself as another. Trans. Kathleen Blamey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ricoeur, Paul. 1994. From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics II. Trans. John B. Thompson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ricoeur, Paul. 2000. What makes us think? A neuroscientist and a philosopher argue about ethics, human nature, and the brain. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ricoeur, Paul. 2003. The rule of metaphor: The creation of meaning in language. Trans. Robert Zerny with Kathleen. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Ricoeur, Paul. 2007. History and truth. Trans. Charles A. Kelbley. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Romano, Claude. 2003. Il y a. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  36. Sallis, John. 1990. Echoes: After Heidegger. Indiana/Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sallis, John. 1995. Double truth. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schunke, Matthew. 2009. Apophatic abuse: Misreading Heidegger’s critique of ontotheology. Philosophy Today (Supplement): 164–172.Google Scholar
  39. Scott-Baumann, Alison. 2012. Ricoeur and the hermeneutics of suspicion. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  40. Seebohm, T.M. 2005. Hermeneutics: Method and methodology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Sheehan, Thomas. 2001. A paradigm shift in Heidegger research. Continental Philosophy Review 34: 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, Christopher. 2012. Destruktion-konstruktion: Heidegger, Gadamer, Ricoeur”. In Gadamer and Ricoeur: Critical horizons for contemporary hermeneutics, ed. Fransis J. Mootz III and George H. Taylor, 15–40. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SUNY CortlandCortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations