Advertisement

The Conflict of Hermeneutics

  • Marc de LaunayEmail author
Chapter
  • 549 Downloads
Part of the Contributions to Hermeneutics book series (CONT HERMEN, volume 2)

Abstract

Ricoeur’s conception of history shows a permanent hesitation between two philosophies of interpretation: Gadamer’s hermeneutics and Schleiermacher’s hermeneutics, hermeneutics as a philosophy and hermeneutics as a method. I provide an example of Biblical interpretation (Genesis 3) to show the consequences of this hesitation.

Keywords

Hermeneutics Bible Myth Theory of history 

Bibliography

  1. Berner, Christian. 2013. Au détour du sens. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
  2. Böckh, August. 1886. In Enzyklopädie und Methodologie der philologischen Wissenschaften, ed. E. Bratuscheck. Leipzig: Teubner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bravo, Benedetto. 1968. Philologie, histoire, philosophie de l’histoire: étude sur J.G. Droysen, historien de l’Antiquité. Varsovie: Académie polonaise des sciences.Google Scholar
  4. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and method. Trans. J. Weinsheimer and D.G. Marshall. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Kant, Immanuel. 1968. Kritik der Urteilskraft. In Akademie Ausgabe Vol. V. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  6. Koselleck, Reinhart. 1985. Futures past. Trans. M.-C. and J. Hoock. Cambridge (Mass.): Yhe PIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2000. Zeitschichten. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  8. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2006. Begriffsgeschichten. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  9. Ricœur, Paul. 1965. History and truth. Trans. and Introd. Ch. A. Kelbey. Evanston: The Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ricœur, Paul, et al. 1971. Exégèse et herméneutique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  11. Ricœur, Paul. 1980. Toward a hermeneutic of the idea of revelation. In Essays on biblical interpretation. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ricœur, Paul. 1984. Time and narrative I. Trans. K. McLaughlin and D. Pellauer. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ricœur, Paul. 1988. Time and narrative III. Trans. K. Blamey and D. Pellauer. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ricœur, Paul. 1991. From text to action. Essays in hermeneutics. Evans. Thompson.Google Scholar
  15. Ricœur, Paul. 2013. Anthropologie philosophique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  16. Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 2012. Vorlesungen zur Hermeneutik und Kritik. In Kritische Gesamtausgabe, II, 4. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  17. Szondi, Peter. 1989. Introduction à l’herméneutique littéraire. Trans. M. Bollack. Paris: Ed. de Minuit.Google Scholar
  18. Vigne, Eric. 2006. Accords et désaccords avec les historiens. Esprit 3: 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wismann, Heinz. 1997. Herméneutique générale, herméneutique universelle: la place des formes symboliques de Cassirer. In Herméneutique: textes, sciences, ed. J.-M. Salanskis, F. Rastier, and R. Schoeps. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS – Archives HusserlParisFrance

Personalised recommendations