Advertisement

Chapter 1 Introduction

  • James R. Asay
  • Lalit C. Chhabildas
  • R. Jeffery Lawrence
  • Mary Ann Sweeney
Chapter
  • 529 Downloads
Part of the Shock Wave and High Pressure Phenomena book series (SHOCKWAVE)

Abstract

The origin of Sandia National Laboratories began with World War II and the Manhattan Project. Prior to the United States entering the war, the U.S. Army leased land then known as Oxnard Field on the desert outskirts of Albuquerque, New Mexico, to refuel and service Army and Navy aircraft in transit. In January 1941, the construction began on the Albuquerque Army Air Base, leading to the establishment near the end of the year of the “Bombardier School-Army Advanced Flying School.” Shortly afterward the base was renamed Kirtland Field, after the Army military pilot Colonel Roy S. Kirtland and, in mid 1942, the Army acquired the installation. During the war, Kirtland Field expanded and served as a major Army Air Corps training installation.

Keywords

Shock Wave Nuclear Weapon Shock Compression Sandia National Laboratory Planar Shock Wave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. L.M. Barker, Measurement of Free Surface Motion by the Slanted Resistor Technology. Sandia National Laboratories Report SC-DR-610078 (Sandia National Laborator, Albuquerque, NM, 1961)Google Scholar
  2. L.M. Barker, Determination of Shock Wave and Particle Velocities from Slanted Resistor Data. Sandia National Laboratories Report SC004611 (RR) (Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, 1962)Google Scholar
  3. L.M. Barker, R.E. Hollenbach, System for measuring the dynamic properties of materials. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 35, 742–746 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. L.M. Barker, R.E. Hollenbach, Interferometer technique for measuring the dynamic mechanical properties of materials. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 36(11), 1617–1620 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. L.M. Barker, Fine structure of compressive and release wave shapes in aluminum measured by the velocity interferometer technique, in Behavior of Dense Media Under High Dynamic Pressures, Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium on the Behavior of Dense Media Under High Dynamic Pressures, Paris, France, September 11–16, 1967, ed. by J. Berger (Gordon and Breach, New York, NY, 1968), pp. 483–504Google Scholar
  6. L.M. Barker, R.E. Hollenbach, A laser interferometer for measuring high velocities of any reflecting surface. J. Appl. Phys. 43(11), 4669–4675 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. L.C. Chhabildas, L.M. Barker, J.R. Asay, T.G. Trucano, G.I. Kerley, J.E. Dunn, Launch capabilities to over 10 km/s, in Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, ed. by S.C. Schmidt, R.D. Dick, J.W. Forbes, D.G. Tasker (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992), pp. 1025–1031Google Scholar
  8. L.C. Chhabildas, L.N. Kmetyk, W.D. Reinhart, C.A. Hall, Enhanced hypervelocity launcher: capabilities to 16 km/s. Int. J. Impact Eng. 17, 183–191 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. R.A. Graham, Piezoelectric behavior of impacted quartz. J. Appl. Phys. 32(3), 555 (1961a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. R.A. Graham, Technique for studying piezoelectricity under transient high stress conditions. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 32(12), 1308–1313 (1961b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. R.A. Graham, G.E. Ingram, W.D. Ingram, Performance of a High Velocity Powder Gun. Sandia National Laboratories Research Report SC-4652 (RR) (Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, 1961)Google Scholar
  12. R.A. Graham, Piezoelectric current from shunted and shorted guard-ring quartz gauges. J. Appl. Phys. 46(5), 1901–1909 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. M.D. Knudson, M.P. Desjarlais, Shock compression of quartz to 1.6 TPa: redefining a pressure standard. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 225501 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Munson, R. May, Interior Ballistics of a Two-Stage Light Gas Gun. Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND75-0323 (Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, 1975)Google Scholar
  15. F.W. Neilson, W.B. Benedick, The piezoelectric response of quartz beyond its Hugoniot elastic limit. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. Ser. II 5(7), 511 (1960)Google Scholar
  16. F.W. Neilson, W.B. Benedick, W.P. Brooks, R.A. Graham, G.W. Anderson, Electrical and optical effects of shock waves in crystalline quartz, in Les Ondes de Detonation, ed. by G. Ribaud (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 1962), pp. 391–419Google Scholar
  17. B. Schmitt, CTH Strong Scaling Results for a One Trillion Zone Problem to 156 Million Cores. Sandia National Laboratories SAND2013-8753 (Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, 2013)Google Scholar
  18. J.H. Smith, L.M. Barker, Measurement of Tilt, Impact Velocity, and Impact Time Between Two Plane Surfaces. Sandia National Laboratories Report SC-4728 (RR) (Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, 1962)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jointly by Sandia Corporation and the Authors 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. Asay
    • 1
  • Lalit C. Chhabildas
    • 1
  • R. Jeffery Lawrence
    • 1
  • Mary Ann Sweeney
    • 1
  1. 1.Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations