Sepsis, Severe Sepsis, and Septic Shock

Chapter

Abstract

The sepsis syndrome represents the wide spectrum of the deleterious inflammatory response to an infectious insult. As the most common cause of mortality in the surgical intensive care unit, understanding the diagnosis and management of sepsis is critical for the surgical ICU physician. Early identification and aggressive resuscitation of the septic patient, combined with adequate surgical source control, can be lifesaving. Surgeons and critical care physicians who care for septic patients should be familiar with current evidence-based practices in the management of sepsis. Patients with organ system dysfunction and failure should be identified and appropriate support initiated. As more patients survive severe sepsis and septic shock, a syndrome of persistent inflammation, immune suppression, and catabolism has been identified and presents a new and difficult challenge for physicians.

Keywords

Sepsis Systemic inflammatory response syndrome Septic shock Infection Severe sepsis Multi-organ failure 

References

  1. 1.
    MacFie J. Surgical sepsis. Br J Surg. 2013;100 Suppl 6:S36–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashbaugh DG, et al. Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet. 1967;2(7511):319–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bone RC, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levy MM, et al. The surviving sepsis campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(2):222–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dombrovskiy VY, et al. Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: a trend analysis from 1993 to 2003. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5):1244–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trunkey DD. Trauma. Accidental and intentional injuries account for more years of life lost in the U.S. than cancer and heart disease. Among the prescribed remedies are improved preventive efforts, speedier surgery and further research. Sci Am. 1983;249(2):28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sauaia A, et al. Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma. 1995;38(2):185–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore LJ, et al. Sepsis in general surgery: the 2005–2007 national surgical quality improvement program perspective. Arch Surg. 2010;145(7):695–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Becher RD, et al. Systemic inflammation worsens outcomes in emergency surgical patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(5):1140–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daley BJ, et al. How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(4):550–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Azuhata T, et al. Time from admission to initiation of surgery for source control is a critical determinant of survival in patients with gastrointestinal perforation with associated septic shock. Crit Care. 2014;18(3):R87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dellinger RP, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knaus WA, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Howell MD, et al. Proof of principle: the predisposition, infection, response, organ failure sepsis staging system. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(2):322–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Macdonald SP, et al. Comparison of PIRO, SOFA, and MEDS scores for predicting mortality in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(11):1257–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vincent JL, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ciriello V, et al. Biomarkers predicting sepsis in polytrauma patients: current evidence. Injury. 2013;44(12):1680–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Casserly B, et al. Lactate measurements in sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion: results from the surviving sepsis campaign database. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(3):567–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walker CA, et al. Early lactate clearance in septic patients with elevated lactate levels admitted from the emergency department to intensive care: time to aim higher? J Crit Care. 2013;28(5):832–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rodriguez A, et al. Mortality and regional oxygen saturation index in septic shock patients: a pilot study. J Trauma. 2011;70(5):1145–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rivers E, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yealy DM, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1683–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mouncey PR, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1301–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chang DW, et al. Volume of fluids administered during resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock and the development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Crit Care. 2014;29(6):1011–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Caironi P, et al. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1412–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sawyer RG, et al. Trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):1996–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rotondo MF, et al. ‘Damage control’: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma. 1993;35(3):375–82; discussion 382–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weber DG, Bendinelli C, Balogh ZJ. Damage control surgery for abdominal emergencies. Br J Surg. 2014;101(1):e109–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khan A, et al. Damage-control laparotomy in nontrauma patients: review of indications and outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(3):365–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith JW, et al. Direct peritoneal resuscitation improves inflammation, liver blood flow, and pulmonary edema in a rat model of acute brain death. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(1):79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Smith JW, et al. Adjunctive treatment of abdominal catastrophes and sepsis with direct peritoneal resuscitation: indications for use in acute care surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(3):393–8; discussion 398–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Waechter J, et al. Interaction between fluids and vasoactive agents on mortality in septic shock: a multicenter, observational study. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(10):2158–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Asfar P, et al. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(17):1583–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Levy B, et al. Comparison of norepinephrine and dobutamine to epinephrine for hemodynamics, lactate metabolism, and gastric tonometric variables in septic shock: a prospective, randomized study. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23(3):282–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Myburgh JA, et al. A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(12):2226–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mehta S, et al. Cardiac ischemia in patients with septic shock randomized to vasopressin or norepinephrine. Crit Care. 2013;17(3):R117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Morelli A, et al. Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(16):1683–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sprung CL, et al. Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(2):111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gordon AC, et al. The interaction of vasopressin and corticosteroids in septic shock: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(6):1325–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Volbeda M, et al. Glucocorticosteroids for sepsis: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(7):1220–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hebert PC, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(6):409–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Holst LB, et al. Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(15):1381–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Massion PB, et al. Persistent hypocoagulability in patients with septic shock predicts greater hospital mortality: impact of impaired thrombin generation. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(8):1326–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zarychanski R, et al. The efficacy and safety of heparin in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(3):511–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ranieri VM, et al. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2055–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bellomo R, et al. Acute renal failure – definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8(4):R204–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    White LE, et al. Acute kidney injury is surprisingly common and a powerful predictor of mortality in surgical sepsis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(3):432–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Force ADT, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–33.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Iacobone E, et al. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy and its differential diagnosis. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10 Suppl):S331–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Polito A, et al. Pattern of brain injury in the acute setting of human septic shock. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gentile LF, et al. Persistent inflammation and immunosuppression: a common syndrome and new horizon for surgical intensive care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of SurgeryJackson Memorial Hospital, Ryder Trauma CenterMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Miami Hospital/Jackson Memorial Hospital/Ryder Trauma CenterMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations