Skip to main content

Conclusions and Policy Recommendations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Eurasian Wheat Belt and Food Security

Abstract

This chapter draws conclusions and provides policy recommendations based on the findings of earlier chapters. This book has shown that, given the availability of large land resources and the low levels of current yields, Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries are strong players in wheat global markets and have great potential to further increase their wheat production and exports, thus strengthening their contribution to global food security. Production growth can be achieved primarily by cultivating more land, increasing current yields and incorporating modern technologies into farming practices. However, the production potential of CIS countries can be realised fully only if the agricultural sector is supported by structural changes including (1) enhancing market institutions and property rights; (2) developing land markets, (3) improving access to credit; (4) creating a reliable and transparent policy-support framework (5), addressing climate and environmental challenges and (6) developing infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AGREX. (2011). Impact assessment of the land re-parceling pilot project in 6 villages: Final report. Chișinău, Moldova: AGREX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobojonov, I., & Aw-Hassan, A. (2014). Impacts of climate change on farm income security in Central Asia: An integrated modelling approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 188, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobojonov, I., Franz, J., Berg, E., Lamers, J. P. A., & Martius, C. (2010). Improved policy making for sustainable farming: A case study on irrigated dryland agriculture in Western Uzbekistan. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 34, 800–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucknall, J., Klytchnikova, I., Lampietti, J., Lundell, M., & Scatast, M. (2003). Irrigation in Central Asia, social, economic and environmental considerations. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciaian, P., Pokrivcak, J., & Drabik, D. (2009). Transaction costs, product specialisation and farm structure in Central and Eastern Europe. Post-Communist Economies, 21, 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EBRD. (2004). Grain receipts programme (Regional). http://www.ebrd.com/documents/evaluation/2004-warehouse-receipt-programmeagricultural-commodities-financing-programme.pdf

  • FAO. (2010). Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests, first draft. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. (2013). Analysis of the asymmetric price transmission in the Ukrainian wheat supply chain, FAPRI-MU Report No 05-13. Colombia, MO: Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellmann, T., Helaine, S., & Nekhay, O. (2014). Harvest failures, temporary export restrictions and global food security: The example of limited grain exports from Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Food Security, 6, 727–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goletti, F., & Chabot, P. (2000). Food policy research for improving the reform of agricultural input and output markets in Central Asia. Food Policy, 25, 661–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götz, L., Glauben, T., & Brümmer, B. (2013). Wheat export restrictions and domestic market effects in Russia and Ukraine during the food crisis. Food Policy, 38, 214–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, F., Rutten, L., & Kiriakov, K. (2009). The use of warehouse receipt finance in agriculture in transition economies. Rome: FAO Investment Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, R., Khoruzhei, S., & Stoyanov, O. (2011). Regulatory and institutional barriers for increasing access to finance for small and medium-scale producers. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Center for Agribusiness Research and Education. (2012). Assessment of the wheat, barley and emmer wheat value chains in Armenia. Yerevan, Armenia: International Center for Agribusiness Research and Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kancs, D., & Ciaian, P. (2010). Factor content of bilateral trade: The role of firm heterogeneity and transaction costs. Agricultural Economics, 41, 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kancs, D., & Ciaian, P. (2012). The factor content of heterogeneous firm trade. World Economy, 35, 373–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kienzler, K. M., Djanibekov, N., & Lamers, J. P. A. (2011). An agronomic, economic and behavioral analysis of N application to cotton and wheat in post-Soviet Uzbekistan. Agricultural Systems, 104, 411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, Z. (2001). Agriculture in transition economies: From common heritage to divergence. Agricultural Economics, 26, 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, Z. (2009). Land reform, farm structure, and agricultural performance in CIS countries. China Economic Review, 20(2), 316–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, Z. (2012). Land reform and farm performance in Europe and Central Asia: a 20 year perspective, Discussion Paper No 2.12, Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macours, K., & Swinnen, J. F. M. (2002). Patterns of Agrarian transition. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50, 365–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathijs, E., & Swinnen, J. F. M. (1998). The economics of agricultural decollectivization in East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Agricultural policy monitoring and evaluation 2011, OECD countries and emerging economies. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013a). Review of agricultural policies: Kazakhstan 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013b). Review of agricultural policies: Kazakhstan. http://www.oecd.org/tad/agricultural-policies/kazakhstan-review-2013.htm (accessed 16 February 2015)

  • OECD-FAO. (2014). Agricultural outlook 2014–2023. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pomfret, R. (2008). Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. In K. Anderson & J. Swinnen (Eds.), Distortions to agricultural incentives in Europe’s transition economies (pp. 297–338). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, I. (2008). World Food Programme regional market survey for the Central Asian Region. Food markets and food insecurity in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, World Food Programme, Regional Bureau Middle East, Central Asia & Eastern Europe (OMC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozelle, S., & Swinnen, J. F. M. (2004). Success and failure of reform: Insights from the transition of agriculture. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 404–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedik, D., Kurbanova, G., & Szentpali, G. (2011). The status and challenges of food security in Central Asia, paper prepared for the third Central Asia Regional Risk Assessment (CARRA) Meeting, Astana, Kazakhstan, 14–15 April 2011. Budapest: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen, J. F. M., & Vranken, L. (2010). Reforms and agricultural productivity in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Republics: 1989–2005. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 33, 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Ciaian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ciaian, P., Gomez y Paloma, S., Mary, S., Langrell, S. (2017). Conclusions and Policy Recommendations. In: Gomez y Paloma, S., Mary, S., Langrell, S., Ciaian, P. (eds) The Eurasian Wheat Belt and Food Security. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33239-0_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics