Skip to main content

Abstract

The evolution of robots in surgical practice is an intriguing story that spans cultures, continents and centuries. The idea of reproducing himself with the use of a mechanical robot has been in man’s imagination in the last 3000 years. However, the use of robots in medicine has only 30 years of history. Surgery has traditionally required larger incisions to allow the surgeon to introduce his hands into the body and to allow sufficient light to see the structures being operated on. Surgeon directly touched and felt the tissues and moved the tip of the instruments. However, innovations have radically changed the performance of surgical procedures in operating room by digitization, miniaturization, improved optics, novel imaging techniques, and computerized information systems. These surgical procedures can be done by manipulating instruments from outside the patient, by looking at displays of direct electronic images of the target organs on the monitor. The robot completes the transition to the Information Age. The surgeon is immersed in this computer-generated environment (called “virtual reality,” term coined by Jaron Lanier, 1986) and sends electronic signals from the joysticks of the console to the tip of the instruments, which mimic the surgeon’s hand movements [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chauhan S, Coelho RF, Kalan S, Satava RM, Patel VR. Evolution of robotic surgery: past, present, and future. In: Patel VR, editor. Robotic urologic surgery. 2nd ed. London: Springer; 2012. p. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M. From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1708–13. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10576.x; discussion 1714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalan S, Chauhan S, Coelho RF, Orvieto MA, Camacho IR, Palmer KJ, Patel VR. History of robotic surgery. J Robotic Surg. 2010;4:141–7. doi:10.1007/s11701-010-0202-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel V, editor. Robotic urologic surgery. 1st ed. London: Springer; 2007. p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonekheere EA, Hayall S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35:153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowersox JC, Shah A, Jensen J, Hill J, Cordts PR, Green PS. Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: initial feasibility studies in swine. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:281–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cowley G. Introducing ‘Robodoc’. A robot finds his calling – in the operating room. Newsweek. 1992;120:86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Unger SW, Unger HM, Bass RT. AESOP robotic arm. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:1131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobs LK, Shayani V, Sackier JM. Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:54–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Falcone T, Goldberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, Margossian H, Stevens L. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: a case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999;9:107–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature. 2001;413(6854):379–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O. 30 Years of robotic surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40:2550–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Intutive surgical 2014 Annual Report.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bogue R. Robots in healthcare. Ind Robot. 2011;38:218Y223.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herron DM, Marohn M. A consensus document on robotic surgery prepared by the SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. http://www.sages.org.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hariharan Palayapalayam Ganapathi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ganapathi, H.P., Ogaya-Pinies, G., Rogers, T., Patel, V.R. (2017). Surgical Robotics: Past, Present and Future. In: Patel, V., Ramalingam, M. (eds) Operative Atlas of Laparoscopic and Robotic Reconstructive Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33231-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33231-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33229-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33231-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics