Advertisement

Biblical Economics and Order Ethics: Constitutional Economic and Institutional Economic Roots of the Old Testament

  • Sigmund Wagner-TsukamotoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Order ethics emerged in the first half of the 20th century in the German-speaking world. It shares many conceptual parallels with constitutional and institutional economics, as pioneered by Buchanan, North, Ostrom or Williamson in the second half of 20th-century USA. The article draws on such conceptual parallels to set out how concepts of order ethics, through the identification of institutional and constitutional economic principles, can be utilized and reconstructed within the Old Testament text. The chapter demonstrates that a high level of success has been attained. Conceptual ideas like dilemma structure, the homo economicus, interactions over capital exchange, institutional rule structures, and mutual gains as interaction outcome, as they delineate constitutional and institutional economics, can be identified in the Old Testament. I focus on the Torah, specifically the Paradise story, the Jacob stories, the Joseph stories, the stories of the exodus events, and the stories of the settlement phase, when the Israelites were led by Joshua, Saul, David and Solomon. These stories belong to the oldest and best-known parts of the Old Testament.

Keywords

Order ethics Institutional/constitutional economics Old testament text Dilemma structure Homo economicus Incentive structures Mutual gains 

References

  1. Armstrong, K. 1996. In the beginning. A new reading of the book of Genesis. London: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  2. Arnal, W. 2010. What branches grow out of this stone rubbish? Christian origins and the study of religion. Studies in Religion 39(4): 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernhardt, W. 2009. Wirtschaftsethik auf Abwegen. Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 09/8, Walter Eucken Institut, Albert-Ludwigs Universität Freiburg, 27 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Brett, M.G. 2000a. Reading the Bible in the context of methodological pluralism: the undermining of ethnic exclusivism in Genesis. In Carroll MDR (ed) Rethinking contexts, rereading texts: contributions from the social sciences to biblical interpretation, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press (JSOT Supplement 299), pp. 48–78.Google Scholar
  5. Brett, M.G. 2000b. Canonical criticism and Old Testament theology. In Text in context, ed. A.D.H. Mayes, 63–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchanan, J.M. 1975. The limits of liberty. Between anarchy and leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan, J. M. 1999a. What should economists do? In The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Vol. 1, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 28–42.Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan, J. M. 1999b. The foundations of normative individualism. In J. M. Buchanan (ed.), The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Liberty, Vol. 1, The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 281–291.Google Scholar
  9. Clines, D.J.A., and Exum, J. C. 1993. The New Literary Criticism. In Exum J. C. and Clines D. J. A. (eds.), The new literary criticism and the hebrew bible, Sheffield: JSOT Press (JSOT Supplement 143), pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, J.W. 1994. Is business ethics an oxymoron? Business Horizons 37(5): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duska, R. 2000. Business ethics: oxymoron or good business? Business Ethics Quarterly 10(1): 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Homann, K. 1994. Ethik und Ӧkonomik. Zur Theoriesstrategie der Wirtschaftsethik. In Wirtschaftsethische Perspektiven I, ed. K. Homann, 9–30. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  13. Homann, K. 1997. Sinn und Grenze der ökonomischenMethode in ther Wirtschaftsethik. In Aufderheide, D. and Dabrowski, M. (eds.), Wirtschaftsethik und Moralökonomik. Normen, soziale Ordnung under der Beitrag der Wirtschaftsethik, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 11–42.Google Scholar
  14. Homann, K. 1999. Die Relevanz der Ӧkonomik für die Implementation ethischer Zielsetzungen. In Korff W. et al. (eds.), Handbuch der Wirtschaftethik, 4 Volumes, Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, Vol. 1, pp. 322–343.Google Scholar
  15. Gerlach, J. 2002. Theologische Wirtschaftsethik als interdisziplinäre Aufgabe. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 3(2): 205–225.Google Scholar
  16. Goodpaster, K.E. 1991. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly 1: 53–72.Google Scholar
  17. Goodpaster, K.E. 2000. Conscience and its counterfeits in organizational life: a new interpretation of the naturalistic fallacy. Business Ethics Quarterly 10(1): 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luce, R. D., and Raiffa, H. 1957. Games and Decisions. Introduction and Critical Survey, New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Lütge, C. 2002. Über Sinn und Methode einer Ordnungsethik. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 3(2): 226–229.Google Scholar
  20. Lütge, C. 2005. Economic ethics, business ethics and the idea of mutual advantages. Business Ethics. A European Review 14(2): 108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Minowitz, P. 1993. Profits, Priests and Princes. Adam Smith’s Emancipation of Economics From Politics and Religion, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Nash, L. 2000. Intensive care for everyone’s least favorite oxymoron: narrative in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 10(1): 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neumann, von, J., and Morgenstern, O. 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. North, D.C. 1991. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1): 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. North, D.C., and B.R. Weingast. 1989. Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History 49: 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pies, I. 1996. Public choice versus constitutional economics: a methodological interpretation of the Buchanan research program. Constitutional Political Economy 7(1): 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pies, I. 2011. Walter Eucken als Klassiker der Ordnungsethik—Eine ordonomische Rekonstruktion. Journal for Business, Economics & Ethics 12(2): 222–249.Google Scholar
  28. Rad, von, G. 1963. Genesis. A Commentary, London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sen, A. 1990. Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. In Beyond self-interest, ed. J.J. Mansbridge, 25–43. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Simon, H.A. 1993. Altruism and economics. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 83(2): 156–161.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, A. 1776/1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 Volumes, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  32. Snyman, G. 2012. The African and Western hermeneutics debate: mimesis, the Book of Esther, and textuality. Old Testament Essays 25(3): 657–684.Google Scholar
  33. Suchanek, A. 1994. Ökonomischer Ansatz und theoretische Integration. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  34. Toorn, van der, K. 2007. Scribal culture and the making of the Hebrew Bible, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Vanberg, V.J. 2004. The Status Quo in contractarian-constitutionalist perspective. Constitutional Political Economy 15: 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vanberg, V. J. 2006. Democracy, citizen sovereignty, and constitutional economics. Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics No. 06/2, Walter Eucken Institut, Albert-Ludwigs University of Freiburg, 20 pages.Google Scholar
  37. Vanberg, V. J. 2014. James M. Buchanan’s contractarianism and modern liberalism. Constitutional Political Economy 25, pp. 18–38.Google Scholar
  38. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2001. Economics of Genesis. On the institutional economic deciphering and reconstruction of the legends of Genesis. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 12: 249–287.Google Scholar
  39. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2003. Human nature and organization theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2008. An economic reading of the exodus: on the institutional economic reconstruction of biblical cooperation failures. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 22(1): 114–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2009a. Is God an Economist?. An Institutional Economic Reconstruction of the Old Testament, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2009b. The Paradise story: a constitutional economic reconstruction. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 34(2): 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2010. Out of a slave contract: the analysis of pre-hobbesian anarchists in the Old Testament. Constitutional Political Economy 21: 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2012a. Questioning the Weber thesis: capitalist ethics and the Hebrew Bible? Sociology Mind 2(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2012b. The tree of life: banned or not banned? a rational choice interpretation. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 26(1): 102–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2012c. After the theft: natural distribution states and prisoner’s dilemmas in the Paradise story. Old Testament Essays 25(3): 705–736.Google Scholar
  47. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2013a. Homo economicus and the stories of Jacob: on the methodological relevance of rational choice theory for studying the Hebrew Bible. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 25: 78–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2013b. State formation in the Hebrew Bible: An Institutional Economic Perspective. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 37(4): 391–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. A. 2013c. The city metaphor and pluralism in Genesis: institutional economics between pre-modern and modern urbanism. Working Paper, School of Management, University of Leicester, in the Leicester Research Archive (LRA): http://hdl.handle.net/2381/27894.
  50. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2013d. The Adam Smith problem revisited: a methodological resolution. Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 19: 63–99.Google Scholar
  51. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. A. 2014a. The Economics of Paradise. On the Onset of Modernity in Antiquity. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. A. 2014b. Rational religion: economic paterns in biblical thought. Working and Research Paper, School of Management, University of Leicester, Leicester Research Archive: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/29200.
  53. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. A. 2015a. Ethical principles of Old Testament economics: implications for the teaching of business ethics. Journal of Religion and Business Ethics 3, Article 16.Google Scholar
  54. Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A. 2015b. The genesis of cooperation in the stories of Joseph: a constitutional and institutional economic reconstruction. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 29: 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Werhane, P.H. 2000. Business ethics and the origins of contemporary capitalism: economics and ethics in the work of Adam Smith and Herbert Spencer. Journal of Business Ethics 24(3): 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Westermann, C. 1984. Genesis 1–11. A commentary. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
  57. Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Williamson, O.E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Williamson, O.E. 2000. The New Institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Windsor, D. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies 43: 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations