Advertisement

An Ordonomic Perspective in Medical Ethics

  • Nikolaus KnoepfflerEmail author
  • Martin O’Malley
Chapter

Abstract

The following discussion uses these three brief case studies to illustrate first the inadequacy of classic bioethical approaches and the basic reasons why approaches that rely on moralistic rules, shaming, and ethics as the setting of limiting rules are unable to efficiently guide medicine in avoiding the dilemmas of the cases. The paper then examines how structural misalignments and institutional incentives are relevant for medical ethics. Finally, the paper offers an argument for an ordonomic approach for medical ethics analogous to the ordonomic approach in business ethics (Pies et al. 2009).

Keywords

Medical Ethic Moral Ideal Ethical Approach Interpersonal Level Hippocratic Oath 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Buchanan, James M. 1990. The domain of constitutional political economy. Constitutional Political Economy 1: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, Tom L., and James L. Childress. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics, 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2013. Risk savvy. How to make good decisions. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Homann, Karl, and Christoph Lütge. 2004. Einführung in die Wirtschaftsethik. Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
  5. ICN (International Code of Nurses).1953. (revised 2012): International Code of Nurses (see: http://www.icn.ch/images/stories/documents/about/icncode_english.pdf).
  6. Johnson, Eric and Goldstein, Daniel. 2003. Do defaults save lives? Science 302: 1338f.Google Scholar
  7. Knoepffler, Nikolaus, and Martin O’Malley. 2010. Human dignity: Regulative principle and absolute value. Journal international de bioéthique 21: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lütge, Christoph. 2012. Ordnungsethik als philosophischer Entwurf. In Ders.: Wirtschaftsethik ohne Illusionen. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 89–110.Google Scholar
  9. Orr, Robert et al. 1997. Use of the hippocratic oath: A review of twentieth century practice and a content analysis of oaths administered in medical schools in the U.S. and Canada in 1993. Journal of Clinical Ethics 8: 377–388.Google Scholar
  10. Pies, Ingo. 2012. Wie kommt die Normativität ins Spiel? – Eine ordonomische Argumentationsskizze. In Ders.: Regelkonsens statt Wertekonsens: Ordnomische Schriften zum politischen Liberalismus. wvb, Berlin, 3–53.Google Scholar
  11. Pies, Ingo, et al. 2009. Moral commitments and the societal role of business: An ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly 19: 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pies, Ingo, et al. 2010. Value creation, management competencies, and global corporate citizenship: An ordonomic approach to business ethics in the age of globalization. Journal of Business Ethics 94: 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Singer, Peter. 1994. Rethinking life & death. The collapse of our traditional ethics. Melbourne: The Text Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  14. UDHR (Universal Declaration of Human Rights). 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (see: http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/).
  15. USCCB (United States Conference of Catholic Bishops). 2009. Ethical and religious directives for catholic health care services, 5th ed. http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/health-care/upload/Ethical-Religious-Directives-Catholic-Health-Care-Services-fifth-edition-2009.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Applied Ethics and Director of Ethics CentreDirector of the Department of Ethics of Sciences of Jena UniversityJenaGermany
  2. 2.Ethics CentreDepartement of Ethics of Sciences of Jena UniversityJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations