Abstract
In forensic investigations, soil traces from pieces of evidence (e.g. shoes, shovels) can be compared to each other or to soil samples from the crime scene. A case report is presented on an attempted rape case using bacterial terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (tRFLP) profiling and pollen analysis. From both the victim’s and the suspect’s clothing soil stains were sampled. No samples from the crime scene were supplied. For both the bacterial profiles and the pollen spectra of the soil samples Bray-Curtis distances were calculated and interpreted using databases. For the pollen spectra palynological knowledge on the frequency of the pollen types was also taken into account. The Bayesian approach was used to express the evidential value of the combined results in which multiple common characteristics were used as opposed to only rare characteristics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aitken C, Berger CEH, Buckleton JS, Champod C, Curran J, Dawid AP, Evett IW, Gill P, Gonzalez-Rodriguez J, Jackson G (2011) Expressing evaluative opinions: a position statement. Sci Justice 51:1–2
Association of Forensic Science Providers (2009) Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. Sci Justice 49:161–164
Beals EW (1984) Bray-Curtis ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Adv Ecol Res 14:1–55
Berger CEH, Buckleton J, Champod C, Evett IW (2011) Evidence evaluation: a response to the court of appeal judgement in R v T. Sci Justice 51:43–49
Brown AG, Smith A, Elmhurst O (2002) The combined use of pollen and soil analyses in a search and subsequent murder investigation. J Forensic Sci 47(3):614–618
Bull PA, Parker A, Morgan RM (2006) The forensic analysis of soil and sediment taken from the cast of a footprint. Forensic Sci Int 162:6–12
Bull PA, Morgan RM, Freudiger-Bonzon J (2008) Letter to the editor – a critique of the present use of some geochemical techniques in geoforensic analysis. Forensic Sci Int 178:e35–e40
Cox RJ, Peterson HL, Young J, Cusik C, Espinoza EO (2000) The forensic analysis of soil organic by FTIR. Forensic Sci Int 108:107–116
Faegri K, Iversen J (1989) Textbook of pollen analysis, 4th revised edition. The Blackburn Press. ISBN 1-930665-016, 328 p
Horrocks M (2004) Technical note: sub-sampling and preparing forensic samples for pollen analysis. J Forensic Sci 49(5):1–4
Horrocks M, Walsh KAJ (1999) Fine resolution of pollen patterns in limited space: differentiating a crime scene and alibi scene seven meters apart. J Forensic Sci 44:417–420
Horsewell J, Cordiner SJ, Maas EW, Martin TM, Sutherland KBW, Speir TW, Nogales B, Osborn AM (2002) Forensic comparison of soils by bacterial community DNA profiling. J Forensic Sci 47:350–353
Kerkhoff W, Stoel RD, Mattijssen EJAT, Hermsen R (2013) The likelihood ratio approach in cartridge case and bullet comparison. AFTE J 45(3):284–289
McQuiston-Surrett D, Saks MJ (2008) The testimony of forensic identification science: what expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear. Law Hum Behav 33(5):436–453
Mildenhall DC (2004) An example of the use of forensic palynology in assessing an alibi. J Forensic Sci 49(2):312–316
Munsterman D, Kestholt S (1996) Sodium polytungstate, a new non-toxic alternative to bromoform in heavy liquid separation. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 91:417–422
Nordgaard A, Ansell R, Drotz W, Jaeger L (2012) Scale of conclusions for the value of evidence. Law, Probab Risk 11(1):1–24
Pasternak Z, Al-Ashhab A, Gatica J, Gafny R, Avraham S, Frenk S, Minz D, Gillor O, Jurkevitch E (2012) Optimization of molecular methods and statistical procedures for forensic fingerprinting of microbial soil communities. Int Res J Microbiol 3(11):363–372
Quaak FCA, Kuiper I (2011) Statistical data analysis of bacterial t-RFLP profiles in forensic soil comparisons. Forensic Sci Int 210:96–101
Riding JB, Kyffin-Hughes JE (2004) A review of the laboratory preparation of palynomorphs with a description of an effective non-acid technique. Rev Bras de Paleontol 70:13–44
Saks MJ, Koehler JJ (1991) What DNA ‘fingerprinting’ can teach the law about the rest of forensic science. Cardozo Law Revies 13:361–372
Saks MJ, Koehler JJ (2005) The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science 5(309):892–895
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Uitdehaag, S., Quaak, F., Kuiper, I. (2016). Soil Comparisons Using Small Soil Traces, A Case Report. In: Kars, H., van den Eijkel, L. (eds) Soil in Criminal and Environmental Forensics. Soil Forensics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33115-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33115-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33113-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33115-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)