Risk Probability Assessment Model Based on PLM’s Perspective Using Modified Markov Process

  • Siravat TeerasoponpongEmail author
  • Apichat Sopadang
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 467)


The management of the supply chain in presence of uncertainty is a challenge task. This paper proposes a stochastic model for modeling both the structure and the operation of the supply chain. Existing approaches for this task are either deterministic or single level structure which might not be appropriate to capture the essences of the supply chain. The proposed method employs the Markov chain model as the foundation and incorporate the concept of multi-level. The levels are used to model both the internal events and the external events. In the proposed method, the product life cycle management is used as a guiding principle to identify each component of the supply chain.


Product life cycle management Supply chain uncertainty Modified Markov process Stochastic process Risk assessment 



This research has been supported by the Excellence Center in Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.


  1. 1.
    Abramovici, M.: Future trends in product lifecycle management (PLM). In: Krause, F.L. (ed.) The Future of Product Development, pp. 665–674. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ameri, F., Dutta, D.: Product lifecycle management: closing the knowledge loops. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 2(5), 577–590 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berchtold, A.: The double chain Markov model. Commun. Stat. Theor. Methods 28(11), 2569–2589 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goh, M., Lim, J.Y., Meng, F.: A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 182(1), 164–173 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huchzermeier, A.H.: Global manufacturing strategy planning under exchange rate uncertainty. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee, H.L., Billington, C.: Material management in decentralized supply chains. Oper. Res. 41(5), 835–847 (1993)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Riddalls, C.E., Bennett, S., Tipi, N.S.: Modelling the dynamics of supply chains. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 31(8), 969–976 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Santoso, T., Ahmed, S., Goetschalckx, M., Shapiro, A.: A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 167(1), 96–115 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stark, J.: Product Lifecycle Management. Springer, London (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stewart, W.J.: Probability, Markov Chains, Queues, and Simulation: The Mathematical Basis of Performance Modeling. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sudarsan, R., Fenves, S.J., Sriram, R.D., Wang, F.: A product information modeling framework for product lifecycle management. Comput. Aided Des. 37(13), 1399–1411 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Venkatasubramanian, V.: Prognostic and diagnostic monitoring of complex systems for product lifecycle management: Challenges and opportunities. Comput. Chem. Eng. 29(6), 1253–1263 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Viswanadham, N., Raghavan, N.S.: Performance analysis and design of supply chains: a Petri net approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51, 1158–1169 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Excellence Center in Logistics and Supply Chain ManagementChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations