Advertisement

Bridging the Gap Between Different Psychological Approaches to Understanding and Reducing the Impact of Social Exclusion

  • Jennifer EckEmail author
  • Paolo Riva
Chapter

Abstract

The omnipresence of social exclusion in everyday life and its negative impact on human functioning underscore the relevance of this topic as a field of research. Not surprisingly, social exclusion has been investigated across psychological subdisciplines. This volume is dedicated to bringing together the psychological subdisciplines’ different approaches to the topic in order to further advance our understanding of this phenomenon. In this concluding chapter, we want to look back to the theories, methods, and findings reviewed in this volume, point out similarities and differences between them, and provide starting points to bridge the gap between different psychological approaches to the topic of social exclusion. Specifically, we discuss the importance of using a consistent terminology for different types of social exclusion experiences across psychological subdisciplines, and relevant issues with regard to methods for investigating social exclusion effects. We also discuss similarities and differences of theoretical models developed within different psychological approaches. Finally, we discuss the reviewed research on interventions aimed at reducing either the occurrence of social exclusion or its negative impact on individuals’ thoughts, feelings, and behavior.

Keywords

Negative Emotion Social Exclusion Future Life Psychological Approach Organizational Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernstein, M. J., & Claypool, H. M. (2012a). Not all social exclusions are created equal: Emotional distress following social exclusion is moderated by exclusion paradigm. Social Influence, 7, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernstein, M. J., & Claypool, H. M. (2012b). Social exclusion and pain sensitivity: Why exclusion sometimes hurts and sometimes numbs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 185–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, M. J., Claypool, H. M., Young, S. G., Tuscherer, T., Sacco, D. F., & Brown, C. M. (2013). Never let them see you cry: Self-presentation as a moderator of the relationship between exclusion and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1293–1305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carstensen, L. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 331–338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carstensen, L. L., Fung, X., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chartrand, T. L., & van Baaren, R. (2009). Human mimicry. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 219–274). New York, NY: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chester, D. S., & DeWall, C. N. (2014). Prefrontal recruitment during social rejection predicts greater subsequent self-regulatory imbalance and impairment: Neural and longitudinal evidence. NeuroImage, 101, 485–493.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Chester, D. S., Pond, R. S., & DeWall, C. N. (2015). Alexithymia is associated with blunted anterior cingulate response to social rejection: Implications for daily rejection. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10, 517–522.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hitlin, S. (2007). Doing good, feeling good: Values and the self’s moral center. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334–339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lakin, J. L., Chartrand, T. L., & Arkin, R. M. (2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19, 816–822.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012). Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 530–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Molden, D. C., Lucas, G. M., Gardner, W. L., Dean, K., & Knowles, M. L. (2009). Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: Being rejected versus being ignored. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 415–431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The social monitoring system: Enhanced sensitivity to social cues as an adaptive response to social exclusion. In K. Williams, J. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213–226). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  18. Richman, L. S., & Leary, M. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365–383.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Riva, P., Montali, L., Wirth, J. H., Curioni, S., & Williams, K. D. (2016). Chronic social exclusion and evidence for the resignation stage: An empirical investigation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0265407516644348.Google Scholar
  20. Scott, K. L., & Duffy, M. K. (2015). Antecedents of workplace ostracism: New directions in research and intervention. In P. L. Perrewé, J. R. B. Halbesleben, & C. C. Rosen (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being (Vol. 13, pp. 137–165). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  21. Scott, K. L., & Thau, S. (2013). Theory and research on social exclusion in work groups. In C. N. DeWall (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social exclusion (pp. 65–73). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sommer, K. L., & Bernieri, F. (2015). Minimizing the pain and probability of rejection: Evidence for relational distancing and proximity seeking within face-to-face interactions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1058–1069.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: Effects of being excluded and ignored. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 275–314). New York, NY: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MannheimMannheimGermany
  2. 2.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations