Skip to main content

Coping with or Buffering Against the Negative Impact of Social Exclusion on Basic Needs: A Review of Strategies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Exclusion

Abstract

In this chapter, we give an overview of research on strategies that help cope with or buffer against the negative psychological consequences of social exclusion. Coping strategies are utilized after the individual has shown reflexive responses to social exclusion (e.g., need threat, negative affect) and should facilitate psychological recovery. Specifically, coping strategies help prevent maladaptive reflective responses to social exclusion such as social withdrawal and aggression by restoring basic needs satisfaction and improving mood. As social withdrawal and aggression are more likely to occur in response to social exclusion when no affiliation opportunity is available or the prospect of social acceptance is low, we focus on coping strategies that can be utilized in such situations, namely reminders of social bonds, social surrogates, and turning to religion. In contrast to coping strategies, buffering strategies are utilized prior to or at the onset of an exclusionary episode and are intended to mitigate or prevent the reflexive responses to social exclusion. Until recently, research findings suggested that reflexive responses to social exclusion are resistant to change. In this chapter, however, we suggest and empirically substantiate the psychological resource hypothesis, according to which strategies that help build up strong psychological resources, such as belonging, self-esteem, control, and meaningfulness, may prove effective as buffers against the reflexive responses to social exclusion. The buffering strategies discussed in this chapter are social companionship during the exclusionary event, belonging to a majority, thinking about money, and visualizing oneself in a powerful position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Please note that in Twenge et al.’s (2007) study participants thought of their favorite celebrity and not just any likeable celebrity as in the study reported by Gardner et al. (2005; see above). However, also a bond with the favorite celebrity is usually only parasocial, that is, it is an illusion of a face-to-face relationship with a media figure (Horton & Wohl, 1956). This coping strategy is elaborated on in the section on social surrogates.

References

  • Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362–1377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, J., Solomon, S., Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2004). The urge to splurge: A terror management account of materialism and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, N., Fischer, P., & Frey, D. (2010). The effects of social exclusion on religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 742–753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, N., Krueger, J., Fischer, J., Hahn, D., Frey, D., Kastenmüller, A., & Fischer, P. (2012). A man’s best friend – How the presence of a dog decreases mental distress after social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 446–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, R., & Dittmar, H. (2008). Individual differences in children’s materialism: The role of peer relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 17–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 589–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, J. L., & Martorana, P. (2006). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology: Special Issue on Social Power, 36, 497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). The American Time Use Survey. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/atus_06242015.htm.

  • Burson, A., Crocker, J., & Mischkowski, D. (2012). Two types of value affirmation: Implications for self-control following social exclusion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 510–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L., & Arkin, R. M. (2002). Materialism as an attempt to cope with uncertainty. Psychology and Marketing, 19, 389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, A. N., Saliba, L., & Deadmarsh, E. J. (2009). Materialism and well-being: The mediating effect of locus of control. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 682–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S., & Hugenberg, K. J. (2009). Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 352–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. J., Carter, E. C., McCullough, M. E., Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., & Nezlek, J. B. (2014). Explaining the relationship between religiousness and substance use: Self-control matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 339–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube, L., LeBel, J. L., & Lu, J. (2005). Affect asymmetry and comfort food consumption. Physiology & Behavior, 86, 559–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J., Schoel, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2016a). All you need is love? Feeling connected results in more negative reactions to ostracism than feeling independent. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J., Schoel, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2016b). Belonging to a majority reduces the immediate need threat from ostracism in individuals with a high need to belong. Manuscript under review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19, 114–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, C., Stok, M. F., & de Ridder, D. T. (2010). Feeling your feelings: Emotion regulation strategies and emotional eating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 792–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friese, M., & Wänke, M. (2014). Personal prayer buffers self-control depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 56–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, A. D., Rus, D., & Lammers, J. (2011). Power: A central force governing psychological, social, and organizational life. In D. De Cremer, R. van Dick, & J. K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and organizations (pp. 17–38). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Knowles, M. L. (2005). Social “snacking” and social “shielding”: The satisfaction of belonging needs through the use of social symbols and the social self. In K. Williams, J. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 227–241). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giessner, S. R., & Schubert, T. (2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders’ power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E. B. (2007). Sensation and perception (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth-Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonsalkorale, K., & Williams, K. D. (2007). The KKK won’t let me play: Ostracism even by a despised outgroup hurts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1176–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, S. A., Williams, K. D., & Carter-Sowell, A. R. (2010). The psychological sting of stigma: The costs of attributing ostracism to racism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 612–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hales, A. H., Wesselmann, E. D., & Williams, K. D. (2016). Prayer, self-affirmation, and distraction improve recovery from short-term ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 64, 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, A. D., Skulborstad, H. M., & Wirth, J. H. (2014). Inoculating against the aversive effects of ostracism with acceptance: The role of attachment styles. Social Influence, 9, 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and parasocial interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Process, 19, 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A. J., Passmore, H., & Buro, K. (2013). Meaning in nature: Meaning in life as a mediator of the relationship between nature connectedness and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1681–1696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., & Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Whether, when, and how is spirituality related to well-being? Moving beyond single occasion questionnaires to understanding daily process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1523–1535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. A. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1998). God as a substitute attachment figure: A longitudinal study of adult attachment style and religious change in college students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 961–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knausenberger, J., Hellmann, J. H., & Echterhoff, G. (2015). When virtual contact is all you need: Subtle reminders of Facebook preempt social-contact restoration after exclusion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 279–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. L. (2007). The nature of parasocial relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. L. (2013). Belonging regulation through the use of (para)social surrogates. In C. N. DeWall (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social exclusion (pp. 275–285). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2008). Benefits of membership: The activation and amplification of group identities in response to social rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1200–1213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. L., Haycock, N., & Shaikh, I. (2015). Does Facebook magnify or mitigate threats to belonging? Social Psychology, 6, 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., & Mackie, D. M. (1990). Majority and minority influence: A judgmental process analysis. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 229–261). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn, M. M., Chen, S., & Gordon, A. M. (2015). Having a thicker skin: Social power buffers the negative effects of social rejection. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 701–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langner, C. A., & Keltner, D. (2008). Social power and emotional experience: Actor and partner effects within dyadic interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 848–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurin, K., Schumann, K., & Holmes, J. G. (2014). A relationship with God? Connecting with the divine to assuage fears of interpersonal rejection. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 777–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., Kelly, K. M., Cottrell, C. M., & Schreindorfer, L. S. (2013). Construct validity of the need to belong scale: Mapping the nomological network. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 610–624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelieveld, G., Moor, B., Crone, E. A., Karremans, J. C., & van Beest, I. (2013). A penny for your pain? The financial compensation of social pain after exclusion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 206–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, J. D., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). A hot new way to measure aggression: Hot sauce allocation. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lücken, M., & Simon, B. (2005). Cognitive and affective experiences of minority and majority members: The role of group size, status, and power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 396–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K., DeWall, C., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the ‘porcupine problem’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, T. M., Stayton, L. E., & Martin, C. E. (2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1239–1252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCourt, A., & Fitzpatrick, J. (2001). The role of personal characteristics and romantic characteristics in parasocial relationships: A pilot study. Journal of Mundane Behavior. Retrieved from http://mundanebehavior.org/category/issues/issue2-1.

  • Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 902–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209–239). New York, NY: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A., & Hansen, I. G. (2006). Belief in supernatural agents in the face of death. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 174–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park, L. E., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Does self-threat promote social connection? The role of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 203–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poon, K. T., Teng, F., Chow, J. T., & Chen, Z. (2015). Desiring to connect to nature: Ostracism increases ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 116–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, D., Wesselmann, E. D., & Williams, K. D. (2013). Interdependent self-construal moderates coping with (but not the initial pain of) ostracism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 320–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudert, S. C., & Greifeneder, R. (2016). When it’s okay that I don’t play: Social norms and the situated construal of social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 955–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1984). Minimal majorities and minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoel, C., Eck, J., & Greifeneder, R. (2014). A matter of vertical position: Consequences of ostracism differ for those above versus below its perpetrators. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoel, C., Zimmer, K., & Stahlberg, D. (2015). The Spatial Power Motivation Scale – A semi-implicit measure of situational power motivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 66–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Williams, K. D. (2004). R U There? Effects of ostracism by cell phone messages. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, F., & Chen, Z. (2012). Does social support reduce distress caused by ostracism? It depends on the level of one’s self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1192–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troisi, J. D., & Gabriel, S. (2011). Chicken soup really is good for the soul: “Comfort food” fulfills the need to belong. Psychological Science, 22, 747–753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1058–1069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M., Zhang, L., Catanese, K. R., Dolan-Pascoe, B., Lyche, L. F., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). Replenishing connectedness: Reminders of social activity reduce aggression after social exclusion. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 20–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Beest, I., Carter-Sowell, A. R., van Dijk, E., & Williams, K. D. (2012). Groups being ostracized by groups: Is the pain shared, is recovery quicker, and are groups more likely to be aggressive? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Beest, I., & Williams, K. D. (2006). When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 918–928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). Psychological consequences of money. Science, 314, 1154–1156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, W. A., Williams, K. D., & Cairns, D. R. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesselmann, E. D., & Williams, K. D. (2010). The potential balm of religion and spirituality for recovering from ostracism. Journal of Management, Spirituality, and Religion, 7, 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 275–314). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WIN/Gallup International. (2015). Losing our religion? Two thirds of people still claim to be religious. Retrieved from http://www.wingia.com/en/news/losing_our_religion_two_thirds_of_people_still_claim_to_be_religious/290/.

  • Wirth, J. H., Sacco, D. F., Hugenberg, K., & Williams, K. D. (2010). Eye gaze as relational evaluation: Averted eye gaze leads to feelings of ostracism and relational devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 869–882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, J. H., & Williams, K. D. (2009). “They don’t like our kind”: Consequences of being ostracized while possessing a group membership. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojciszke, B., & Struzynska-Kujalowicz, A. (2007). Power influences self-esteem. Social Cognition, 25, 472–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadro, L., Boland, C., & Richardson, R. (2006). How long does it last? The persistence of the effects of ostracism in the socially anxious. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 692–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer lowers belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., & Gao, D.-G. (2008). Social support and money as pain management mechanisms. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). The symbolic power of money: Reminders of money after social distress and physical pain. Psychological Science, 20, 700–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Eck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eck, J., Schoel, C., Greifeneder, R. (2016). Coping with or Buffering Against the Negative Impact of Social Exclusion on Basic Needs: A Review of Strategies. In: Riva, P., Eck, J. (eds) Social Exclusion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33033-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics