Abstract
As already mentioned in Chap. 7, many raw economic time series are nonstationary and become stationary only after some transformation. The most common of these transformations is the formation of differences, perhaps after having taken logs. In most cases first differences are sufficient to achieve stationarity. The stationarized series can then be analyzed in the context of VAR models as explained in the previous chapters. However, many economic theories are formalized in terms of the original series so that we may want to use the VAR methodology to infer also the behavior of the untransformed series. Yet, by taking first differences we loose probably important information on the levels. Thus, it seems worthwhile to develop an approach which allows us to take the information on the levels into account and at the same time take care of the nonstationary character of the variables. The concept of cointegration tries to achieve this double requirement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A more recent interesting application of this model is given by the work of Beaudry and Portier (2006).
- 2.
This condition could be relaxed and replaced by the condition \(\sum _{j=0}^{\infty }j^{2}\|\Psi _{j}\|^{2} < \infty \). In addition, this condition is an important assumption for the application of the law of large numbers and for the derivation of the asymptotic distribution (Phillips and Solo 1992).
- 3.
The distribution of X 0 is thereby chosen such that \(\beta 'X_{0} =\beta '\widetilde{\Psi }(\mathrm{L})Z_{0}\).
- 4.
The seasonal unit roots are the roots of \(z^{s} - 1 = 0\) where s denotes the number of seasons. These roots can be expressed as \(\cos (2k\pi /s) +\iota \sin (2k\pi /s)\), \(k = 0, 1,\ldots,s - 1\).
- 5.
- 6.
If the VAR model (16.9) contains further deterministic components besides the constant, these components have to be accounted for in these regressions.
- 7.
This two-stage least-squares procedure is also known as partial regression and is part of the Frisch-Waugh-Lowell Theorem (Davidson and MacKinnon 1993, 19–24).
- 8.
Thereby we make use of the following equality for partitioned matrices:
$$\displaystyle{ \det \left (\begin{array}{*{10}c} A_{11} & A_{12}\\ A_{ 21} & A_{22}\\ \end{array} \right ) =\det A_{11}\det (A_{22}-A_{21}A_{11}^{-1}A_{ 12}) =\det A_{22}\det (A_{11}-A_{12}A_{22}^{-1}A_{ 21}) }$$where A 11 and A 22 are invertible matrices (see for example Meyer 2000, p. 475).
- 9.
- 10.
It is instructive to compare theses cases to those of the unit root test (see Sect. 7.3.1).
- 11.
The tables by MacKinnon et al. (1999) allow for the possibility of exogenous integrated variables.
- 12.
The choice of the variables used for normalization turns out to be important in practice. See the application in Sect. 16.5.
- 13.
The degrees of freedom are computed according to the formula: \(s(n - r) = 1(4 - 3) = 1\).
- 14.
The degrees of freedom are computed according to the formula: \(r(n - s) = 3(4 - 3) = 3\).
References
Andrews DWK, Monahan JC (1992) An improved heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimator. Econometrica 60:953–966
Banerjee A, Dolado J, Galbraith JW, Hendry DF (1993) Co-integration, error-correction, and the econometric analysis of non-stationary data. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bauer D, Wagner M (2003) A canonical form for unit root processes on the state space framework, diskussionsschrift 3-12, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut, Universität Bern
Beaudry P, Portier F (2006) Stock prices, news and economic fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 96(4):1293–1307
Campbell JY (1987) Does saving anticipate declining labor income? An alternative test of the permanent income hypothesis. Econometrica 55:1249–1273
Campbell JY, Shiller RJ (1987) Cointegration and tests of present value models. J Polit Econ 95:1062–1088
Cavaliere G, Rahbek A, Taylor AMR (2012) Bootstrap determination of the co-integration rank in vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 80:1721–1740
Davidson JEH, Hendry DF, Srba F, Yeo S (1978) Econometric modelling of the aggregate time-series relationship between consumers’ expenditure and income in the United Kingdom. Econ J 88:661–692
Davidson R, MacKinnon JG (1993) Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276
Gonzalo J, Ng S (2001) A systematic framework for analyzing the dynamic effects of permanent and transitory schocks. J Econ Dyn Control 25:1527–1546
Hansen BE (1992) Efficient estimation and testing of cointegrating vectors in the presence of deterministic trends. J Econ 53:321–335
Hylleberg S, Engle RF, Granger CWJ, Yoo S (1990) Seasonal integration and cointegration. J Econ 44:215–238
Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254
Johansen S (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59:1551–1580
Johansen S (1995) Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Johansen S (2007) Cointegration: A survey. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Econometric theory, palgrave handbook of econometrics, vol 1. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke and New York, pp 540–577
Johansen S, Schaumburg E (1998) Likelihood analysis of seasonal cointegration. J Econ 88:301–339
Kailath T (1980) Linear systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
King RG, Plosser CI, Stock JH, Watson MW (1991) Stochastic trends and economic fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 81:819–840
Kunst R, Neusser K (1990) Cointegration in a macroeconomic system. J Appl Econ 5:351–365
Lütkepohl H (2006) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer, Berlin
MacKinnon JG, Haug A, Michelis L (1999) Numerical distribution functions of the likelihood ratio test for cointegration. J Appl Econ 14:563–577
Meyer CD (2000) Matrix analysis and applied linear algebra. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia
Neusser K (1991) Testing the long-run implications of the neoclassical growth model. J Monet Econ 27:3–37
Neusser K (2000) An algebraic interpretation of cointegration. Econ Lett 67:273–281
Neusser K, Kugler M (1998) Manufacturing growth and financial development: Evidence from oecd countries. Rev Econ Stat 80:638–646
Osterwald-Lenum M (1992) A note with quantiles of the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood cointegration rank test statistics. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 54:461–471
Phillips PCB (1991) Optimal inference in cointegrating systems. Econometrica 59:283–306
Phillips PCB, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regresssion with I(1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57:99–125
Phillips PCB, Solo V (1992) Asymptotics for linear processes. Ann Stat 20:971–1001
Reinsel GC (1993) Elements of multivariate time series analysis. Springer Series in statistics. Springer, New York
Stock JH, Watson MW (1988a) Testing for common trends. J Am Stat Assoc 83:1097–1107
Strang G (1988) Linear algebra and its applications, 3rd edn. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego
Watson MW (1994) Vector autoregressions and cointegration. Handbook of econometrics, vol 4, chap 47. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 2843–2915
Yoo BS (1987) Multi-cointegrated time series and a generalized error correction model. Ph.D., University of California, San Diego
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neusser, K. (2016). Cointegration. In: Time Series Econometrics. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32862-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32862-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32861-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32862-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)