Skip to main content

Hypothetical Planets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In the long history of astronomical observation, there have been many errors, but claiming to find a new planet when there really isn’t one is certainly a mistake greater than most.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashbrook, J.: 1957, The Field of Mizar and Alcor. Sky & Telescope 16, April issue, 265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C.: 2004, The Planet Hercules. Mercury 33(5), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C.: 2017, Ludwig’s Star. Book in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, C. von: 1801, Neu bearbeiteter hundertjähriger Haus-Kalender. Johann Andreas Heinrich, Grätz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huth, J.: 1802, Beobachtung eines beweglichen Sterns im Löwen. Berlin Astronomical Yearbook for 1805, 215-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huth, J.: 1804, Letter of 21 September to Bode. Berlin Astronomical Yearbook of 1807, 264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J. A.: 1802, Letter dated 24 August. Quoted in Kragh, H.: 2008, The Moon That Wasn’t: The Saga of Venus’ Spurious Satellite, pg. 112. Birkhauser, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebknecht, J.G.: 1723, Colegae uberior stellae Ludovicianae noviter detectae. Gissae, litteris Joh. Mülleri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature, Aug. 3 issue, pg. 291-292 (1876).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olbers, W.: 1805. Letter to Gauss, dated January 20. Goettingen archives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parley, P.: 1837, Tales about the Sun, Moon and Stars, second edition. Thomas Tegg, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Church of England Quarterly Review, 6, 134 (1839).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Plaindealer, December 3 issue. Vol. 1(1), 11 (1836).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisserand, F.: 1882, Notice of French Observatories Towards the End of the Last Century. The Astronomical Register 19 (225), 218-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P.: 1804. Letter to William Herschel, dated 19 May. RAS, Herschel archives, 13.W.145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zach, F.: 1805. Letter to Carl Gauss, dated 25 November. Goettingen University archives.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clifford J. Cunningham .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cunningham, C.J. (2017). Hypothetical Planets. In: Studies of Pallas in the Early Nineteenth Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32848-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics