Skip to main content

Abstract

Without further ado I stocked my ship with necessary provisions, took off and, after numerous adventures we need not go into here, finally spotted in a great swarm of stars one that differed from all the rest, since it was a perfect cube.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Actually, this is the case where the set of weakly efficient variants does not coincide with the set of efficient variants (see footnote 2 of Chap. 7). Indeed, besides outcome (−8, −2) also outcome (−9, −2) solves optimization problem (8.3). From those two outcomes outcome (−9, −2) is clearly dominated by outcome (−8, −2). In consequence, only outcome (−8, −2) is efficient.

  2. 2.

    Scientific Circle for Human Feeding of the Medical Academy of Gdynia, http://kn.am.gdynia.pl/nkzc/kz/kz_norm.html, as of the end of 2008.

References

  1. Ehrgott, M., 2005. Multicriteria optimization. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaliszewski, I., 1994. Quantitative Pareto Analysis by Cone Separation Technique. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaliszewski, I., 2006. Soft computing for complex multiple criteria decision making problems. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Köksalan, M., Wallenius, J., Zionts S., 2011. Multiple Criteria Decision Making From Early History to the 21st Century. World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Miettinen, K.M., 1999. Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wierzbicki, A.P., (1999), Reference point approaches. In: Multicriteria Decision Making – Advances in MCDM: Models, Algorithms, Theory and Applications. Gal T., Stewart Th., Hanne Th. (Eds.) Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yu, P.L., Leitman, G., 1974. Compromise solutions, domination structures and Salukvadze’s solution. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 14, 362–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

9.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaliszewski, I., Miroforidis, J., Podkopaev, D. (2016). Decision Problems, Continuation. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Making by Multiobjective Optimization. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 242. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32756-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics