Center of Ventilation—Methods of Calculation Using Electrical Impedance Tomography and the Influence of Image Segmentation

Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 57)

Abstract

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a promising non-invasive, radiation-free imaging modality. Using EIT-derived index Center of ventilation (CoV), ventral-to-dorsal shifts in distribution of lung ventilation can be assessed. The methods of CoV calculation differ among authors and so does the segmentation of EIT images from which the CoV is calculated. The aim of this study is to compare the values of CoV obtained using different algorithms, applied in variously segmented EIT images. An animal trial (n=4) with anesthetized mechanically ventilated pigs was conducted. In one animal, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was induced by repeated whole lung lavage. Incremental steps in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), each with a value of 5 cmH2O (or 4 cmH2O in the ARDS model), were performed to reach total PEEP level of 25 cmH2O (or 22 cmH2O in the ARDS model). EIT data were acquired continuously during this PEEP trial. From each PEEP level, 30 tidal variation (TV) images were used for analysis. Functional regions of interest (ROI) were defined based on the standard deviation (SD) of pixel values, using threshold 15%–35% of maximum pixel SD. The results of this study show that there might be statistically significant differences between the values obtained using different methods for calculation of CoV. The differences occured in healthy animals as well as in the ARDS model. Both investigated algorithms are relatively insensitive to the image segmentation.

Keywords

Center of Ventilation Center of Gravity Electrical Impedance Tomography EIT Region of interest 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frerichs I., Hinz J., Herrmann P., et al. Detection of local lung air content by electrical impedance tomography compared with electron beam CT J Appl Physiol. 2002;93:660-666.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holder D.S.. Electrical Impedance Tomography: methods, history and applications. Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Pub. 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Putensen C., Wrigge H., Zinserling J.. Electrical impedance tomography guided ventilation therapy Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13:344-350.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adler A., Amato M.B., Arnold J.H., et al. Whither lung EIT: Where are we, where do we want to go and what do we need to get there? Physiol Meas. 2012;33:679-694.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frerichs I., Hahn G., Golisch W., Kurpitz M., Burchardi H., Hellige G. Monitoring perioperative changes in distribution of pulmonary ventilation by functional electrical impedance tomography Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42:721-726.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frerichs I., Dargaville P.A., Van Genderingen H., Morel D.R., Rimensberger P.C.. Lung volume recruitment after surfactant administration modifies spatial distribution of ventilation Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:772-779.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schibler A., Yuill M., Parsley C., Pham T., Gilshenan K., Dakin C.. Regional ventilation distribution in non-sedated spontaneously breathing newborns and adults is not different Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009;44:851-858.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Heerde M., Roubik K., Kopelent V., Kneyber M.C.J., Markhorst D.G.. Spontaneous breathing during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation improves regional lung characteristics in experimental lung injury Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:1248-1256.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Radke O.C., Schneider T., Heller A.R., Koch T.. Spontaneous breathing during general anesthesia prevents the ventral redistribution of ventilation as detected by electrical impedance tomography: A randomized trial Anesthesiology. 2012;116:1227-1234.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blankman P., Hasan D., Erik G.J., Gommers D.. Detection of ‘best’ positive end-expiratory pressure derived from electrical impedance tomography parameters during a decremental positive end-expiratory pressure trial Crit Care. 2014;18.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao Z., Frerichs I., Pulletz S., Müller-Lisse U., Möller K.. The influence of image reconstruction algorithms on linear thorax EIT image analysis of ventilation Physiol Meas. 2014;35:1083-1093.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schaefer M.S., Wania V., Bastin B., et al. Electrical impedance tomography during major open upper abdominal surgery: A pilot-study BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luepschen H., Meier T., Grossherr M., Leibecke T., Karsten J., Leonhardt S.. Protective ventilation using electrical impedance tomography Physiol Meas. 2007;28:S247-S260.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pulletz S., Van Genderingen H.R., Schmitz G., et al. Comparison of different methods to define regions of interest for evaluation of regional lung ventilation by EIT Physiol Meas. 2006;27:S115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Biomedical EngineeringCzech Technical University in PragueKladnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations