Optimal Short Distance Electrode Locations for Impedance Pneumography Measurement from the Frontal Thoracic Area

  • Vala Jeyhani
  • Tiina Vuorinen
  • Kai Noponen
  • Matti Mäntysalo
  • Antti Vehkaoja
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 57)

Abstract

Electrical impedance pneumography signal is a valuable tool in qualifying better the person’s health condition. It can be used in monitoring of respiration rate, rhythm and tidal volume. Impedance pneumography has also the potential in ambulatory physiological monitoring systems that are increasingly often implemented using plaster-like on-body devices. In such cases, the area of electrode substrate may be limited and therefore, the electrode configuration, which is able to provide both a clinically valuable electrocardiogram signal and accurate pulmonary information, is an issue. EAS is a useful small area electrode configuration that can be used for electrocardiogram measurements. In this work, different two-electrode bipolar pairs of EAS system are tested for impedance pneumography measurements. Two additional electrodes are also considered in these tests. Our results show that the electrode pair S-A provides the most accurate respiration cycle length and is least affected by movement artifact. Additionally, the results show that this electrode pair produces the signals with highest amplitude.

Keywords

Pneumography Electrode Location Impedance Respiration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Freundlich J J, Erickson J C. Electrical impedance pneumography for simple nonrestrictive continuous monitoring of respiratory rate, rhythm and tidal volume for surgical patients CHEST Journal. 1974;65:181–184.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hill S L, Blackburn J P, Williams T R. Measurement of respiratory flow by inductance pneumography Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing. 1982;20:517–518.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    AL-Khalidi F Q, Saatchi R, Burke D, Elphick H, Tan S. Respiration rate monitoring methods: A review Pediatric pulmonology. 2011;46:523–529.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schéele B H C Von, Schéele I A M Von. The measurement of respiratory and metabolic parameters of patients and controls before and after incremental exercise on bicycle: supporting the effort syndrome hypothesis? Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 1999;24:167–177.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mirmohamadsadeghi L, Vesin J-M. Respiratory rate estimation from the ECG using an instantaneous frequency tracking algorithm Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2014;14:66–72.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leonard P A, Douglas J G, Grubb N R, Clifton D, Addison P S, Watson J N. A fully automated algorithm for the determination of respiratory rate from the photoplethysmogram Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2006;20:33–36.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Willis Hurst J. Would Different Routine Precordial Electrode Positions Be More Useful? Answer: Not Likely Clin Cardiol. 2009;32:58–64.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lahtinen O, Seppä V-P, Väisänen J, Hyttinen J. Optimal electrode configurations for impedance pneumography during sports activities 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering. 2009:1750–1753.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luo S, Afonso V X, Webster J G, Tompkins W J. The electrode system in impedance-based ventilation measurement Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions. 1992;39:1130–1141.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khambete N, Metherall P, Brown B, Smallwood R, Hose R. Can we optimize electrode placement for impedance pneumography? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1999;873:534–542.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seppä V-P, Hyttinen J, Uitto M, Chrapek W, Viik J. Novel electrode configuration for highly linear impedance pneumography Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering. 2013;58:35–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vala Jeyhani
    • 1
  • Tiina Vuorinen
    • 2
  • Kai Noponen
    • 3
  • Matti Mäntysalo
    • 2
  • Antti Vehkaoja
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Automation Science and EngineeringTampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communications EngineeringTampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland
  3. 3.Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations