Advertisement

On a Qualitative Game Theoretic Approach of Teacher-Student Interaction in a Public Higher Education Service System

  • Virginia Ecaterina Oltean
  • Theodor Borangiu
  • Monica Drăgoicea
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 247)

Abstract

Public higher education services receive nowadays intense attention from the society from at least two perspectives: the high level professional performances requested by companies and public administration as final customers of the educational service system, on one side, and the problem encountered by the authorities in deciding how to dedicate the financial support for universities from the public budget, taking into account also the present state of the labour market and its trend, on another side. Starting from empirical considerations, this paper proposes an ontology model of a generic public higher education service system and several scenarios regarding a qualitative game modelling approach of a Teacher-Student interaction when this service system is placed in an emerging economy and, comparatively, in a mature free market economy.

Keywords

Bimatrix game Dominant strategy Decision system Evolutionary game Strategic game Extensive form game Value co-creation Service system ontology 

References

  1. 1.
    Spohrer, J., Anderson, L., Pass, N., Ager, T.: Service science and service-dominant logic. Paper no: 2, Otago Forum 2, Academic Papers (2008). www.business.otago.ac.nz
  2. 2.
    Borangiu, Th, Oltean, V.E., Drăgoicea, M., Falcão e Cunha, J., Iacob, I.: Some aspects concerning a generic service process model building. In: Snene, M., Leonard, M. (eds.) IESS 2014. LNBIP, vol. 169, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hezel, F.X.: Recent Theories of the Relationship between Education and Development (1974). http://micsem.org/pubs/articles/education/frames/rectheorfr.htm
  4. 4.
    Correa, H., Gruver, G.W.: Teacher-student interaction: a game theoretic extension of the economic theory of education. Math. Soc. Sci. 13(1), 19–47 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Selim, T.H.: The education market in Egypt: a game theory approach. Economic Research Forum, Working paper Series, Working Paper 442 (2008). https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/422.html
  6. 6.
    Fukiharu, T.: The reform of higher education in Japan: a game-theoretic analysis of intensified competition. In: MODSIM 2005 the International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, pp. 1007–1013, December 2005. http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim05/papers/fukahiru.pdf
  7. 7.
    Şahin, A.: The Incentive Effects of Higher Education Subsidies on Student Effort. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, no. 192 (2004). https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr192.pdf
  8. 8.
    Franck, B., Owen, R.F.: International migration of brains, educational competition and national interests: a two-country, game-theoretic approach. In: ETSG 2014 the 16th Annual Conference of the European Trade and Study Group, LMU Munich and Ifo Institute, September 2014. http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2014/Papers/352.pdf
  9. 9.
    Lemey, E., Poels, G.: Towards a service system ontology for service science. In: Kappel, G., Maamar, Z., Motahari-Nezhad, H.R. (eds.) ICSOC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7084, pp. 250–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katzan Jr., H.: Foundations of service science: concepts and facilities. Journal of Service Science 1, 1–22 (2008) (Third Quarter 2008) The Clute Institute (2008). http://www.cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/JSS/issue/view/468
  11. 11.
    Grönross, C., Voima, P.: Making Sense of Value and Value Co-Creation in Service Logic. Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tringh, T.H., Liem, N.Th., Kachitvichyanukul, V.: A game theory approach for value co-creation systems. Prod. Manuf. Res. An Open Access J. 2(1), 253–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2014.913124
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Kapitsa, P.L.: Basic factors in the organization of science, and how they are handled in the U.S.S.R. (originally published in Daedalus, J. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sciences, 102, 167—176 (1973)) In: Experiment, Theory and Practice, Articles and Addresses, 183–197, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dodrecht, Holland (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virginia Ecaterina Oltean
    • 1
  • Theodor Borangiu
    • 1
  • Monica Drăgoicea
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Automatic Control and ComputersPolitehnica University of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations