Advertisement

The Assessment of Municipal Services: Environmental Efficiency of Buildings Construction

  • Isabel M. Horta
  • Ana S. Camanho
  • Teresa G. Dias
  • Samuel Niza
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 247)

Abstract

This paper develops an innovative methodology to assess municipal performance concerning the environmental efficiency of new buildings construction, focusing on the consumption of different types of materials. This study aims to support local governments in the definition of policies for improvements in service provision based on the results of a benchmarking study. The methodology developed includes two stages. The first step concerns the evaluation of municipal environmental efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis and the identification of factors that may explain different levels of performance. The second step enables the classification of municipalities in terms of the efforts required to achieve environmental efficiency. For this purpose, we used clustering analysis, namely the k-means algorithm. To illustrate the methodology developed, we analyzed the data of the major materials used in the construction of new buildings (metals, non-metallic minerals, fossil fuels, and biomass) in the municipalities of Lisbon metropolitan area between 2003 and 2009. The study revealed that the environmental efficiency of new buildings construction varies considerably among municipalities, suggesting a high potential for performance improvement.

Keywords

Municipal services Public sector Buildings Data envelopment analysis Clustering 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Leonardo Rosado from Chalmers University, Gothenburg, for compiling some of the data used in this study. The authors also acknowledge the financial support of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through iTEAM project (MIT-Pt/SES-SUES/0041/2008) and MeSUr project (PTDC/SEN- ENR/111710/2009).

References

  1. 1.
    Cruz, N.F., Marques, R.C.: Revisiting the determinants of local government performance. Omega 44, 91–103 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Horta, I.M., Camanho, A.S., Dias, T.G.: Residential building resource consumption: a comparison of Portuguese municipalities’ performance. Cities 50, 54–61 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    CIB and UNEP-IETC: Agenda 21 for sustainable construction in developing countries. Technical report Bou/E0204 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kibert, C.: Principles of sustainable construction. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Sustainable Construction, Tampa (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vatalis, K.I., Manoliadis, O.G., Charalampides, G.: Assessment of the economic benefits from sustainable construction in Greece. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World 15(5), 377–383 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding, G.K.: Sustainable construction: the role of environmental assessment tools. J. Environ. Manage. 86(3), 451–464 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ilha, M.S.O., Oliveira, L.H., Goncalves, O.M.: Environmental assessment of residential buildings with an emphasis on water conservation. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 30(1), 15–26 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., Shukla, K.K.: Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: an overview. Energy Build. 42, 1592–1600 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharma, A., Saxena, A., Sethi, M., Shree, V.: Life cycle assessment of buildings: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 871–875 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mwasha, A., Williams, R.G., Iwaro, J.: Modeling the performance of residential building envelope: the role of sustainable energy performance indicators. Energy Buildings 43(9), 2108–2117 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bribián, I., Capilla, A., Alfonso, U.: Life cycle assessment of building materials: comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Build. Environ. 46, 1133–1140 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bjorklund, T., Tillman, A. M.: LCA of building frame structures environmental impact over the life cycle of wooden and concrete frames. Technical Environmental Planning Report. Chalmers University of Technology, Uppsala, (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koroneos, C., Dompros, A.: Environmental assessment of brick production in Greece. Build. Environ. 42(5), 2114–2123 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Traverso, M., Rizzo, G., Finkbeiner, M.: Environmental performance of building materials: life cycle assessment of a typical Sicilian marble. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15(1), 104–114 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim, K.H.: A comparative life cycle assessment of a transparent composite facade system and a glass curtain wall system. Energy Build. 43(12), 3436–3445 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmidt, A.C., Jensen, A.A., Clausen, A.U., Kamstrup, O., Postlethwaite, D.: A comparative life cycle assessment of building insulation products made of stones wool, paper wool and flax. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 9, 122–129 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haapio, A.: Towards sustainable urban communities. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 32(1), 165–169 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6), 429–444 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simar, L., Wilson, P.: Non-parametric tests of returns to scale. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 139(1), 115–132 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Efron, B.: Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat. 7(1), 1–26 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cheng, Y.-M., Leu, S.S.: Constraint-based clustering and its applications in construction management. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3), 5761–5767 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    David, G., Averbuch, A.: SpectralCAT: categorical spectral clustering of numerical and nominal data. Pattern Recognit. 45(1), 416–433 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    MacQueen, J. B.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceeding of the fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University of California Press, vol. 1, pp. 281–297 (1967)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., Hastie, T.: Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. J. Roy. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 63(2), 411–423 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwarz, G.: Estimating dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6(2), 461–464 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rosado, L., Niza, S., Ferrão, P.: A new method for urban material flow accounting: UMAn - a case study of the lisbon metropolitan area. J. Ind. Ecol. 18(1), 84–101 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Asif, M., Muneer, T., Kelley, R.: Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland. Build. Environ. 42(3), 1391–1394 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bastianoni, S., Galli, A., Pulselli, R.M., Niccolucci, V.: Environmental and economic evaluation of natural capital appropriation through building construction: practical case study in the Italian context. Ambio 36(7), 559–565 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shin, S., Tae, S., Woo, J., Roh, S.: The development of environmental load evaluation system of a standard Korean apartment house. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15(2), 1239–1249 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    EUROSTAT: Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators: a methodological guide. Technical report, Statistical Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2001)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Avkiran, N.: Productivity Analysis in the Service Sector with Data Envelopment Analysis. Camira, Queensland (1999)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Quenouille, M.: Approximate tests of correlation in time series. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 11(Series B), 68–84 (1949)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Charles, V., Kumar, M., Kavitha, S.I.: Measuring the efficiency of assembled printed circuit boards with undesirable outputs using data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Production Economics 136(1), 194–206 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mostafa, M.M.: Does efficiency matter?: examining the efficiency-profitability link in the US specialty retailers and food consumer stores. Int. J. Prod. Performance Manage. 59(3), 255–273 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hwang, B.G., Liao, P.C., Leonard, M.P.: Performance and practice use comparisons: public vs. private owner projects. KSCE J. Civil Eng. 15(6), 957–963 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Simar, L., Wilson, P.: Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J. Econometrics 136(1), 31–64 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabel M. Horta
    • 1
  • Ana S. Camanho
    • 1
  • Teresa G. Dias
    • 1
  • Samuel Niza
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculdade de EngenhariaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Instituto Superior Técnico - Universidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations