Multi-Level Governance in Universities pp 49-74

Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 47) | Cite as

Academic Entrepreneurialism and Changing Governance in Universities. Evidence from Empirical Studies

Chapter

Abstract

Entrepreneurial universities are increasingly important points of reference for international and European-level policy discussions on reforming higher education systems, and especially on a shift in its financing towards more self-reliance and its secure sustainable development in competitive environments. The chapter analyzes academic entrepreneurialism as emerging from recent European comparative (theoretical and empirical) studies. It outlines the theoretical (and ideological) “modernization agenda” of European universities promoted by the European Commission. Case studies of selected European institutions show that the modernization processes in question (and their emphasis on academic entrepreneurialism widely understood) have already been in progress in numerous institutions in different systems across Europe. The case studies also stress the pivotal role of changing governance at most entrepreneurially-oriented European universities.

Keywords

Academic entrepreneurialism Entrepreneurial universities European universities Entrepreneurship Financial self-reliance Revenue generation University governance University management 

References

  1. Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colell, A., & Sapir, A. (2008). Higher aspirations: An agenda for reforming European universities. Brussels: Bruegel.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, F. K., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (Eds.). (2003). Maximizing revenue in higher education. New directions for institutional research. San Francisco: A Wiley Periodicals.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez, S. A., Agarwal, R., & Sorenson, O. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Interdisciplinary perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, E., Deuten, J., & Zaman, R. (2006). Four case studies in university modernisation: KU Leuven, Twente, Manchester and Loughborough. Enschede: Technopolis.Google Scholar
  5. Audretsch, D. B. (2007). The entrepreneurial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braunerhjelm, P. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship: Social norms, university culture and policies. Science and Public Policy, 34(9), 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breneman, D. W., Pusser, B., & Turner, S. E. (Eds.). (2006). Earnings from learning. The rise of for-profit universities. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities. Organizational pathways of transformation. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, B. R. (2003). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(2), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, B. R. (2004). Sustaining change in universities. Continuities in case studies and concepts. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. EC. European Commission. (2005). Mobilising the brainpower of Europe: Enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon strategy (p. 152). Brussels: European Commission. COM.Google Scholar
  13. EC. European Commission. (2006). Delivering on the modernization agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation (p. 208). Brussels: European Commission. COM.Google Scholar
  14. Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The entrepreneurial university and the emergence of democratic corporatism. In H. Etzkowitz & L. Leydesdorff (Eds.), Universities and global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government (pp. 141–152). London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  15. Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the rise of entrepreneurial science. Studies in global competition series. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Etzkowitz, H., Ranga, M., Benner, M., Guaranys, L., Maculan, A. M., & Kneller, R. (2008). Pathways to the entrepreneurial university: Towards a global convergence. Science and Public Policy, 35(9), 681–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fayolle, A., & Redford, D. T. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook on the entrepreneurial university. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Florida, R., & Cohen, W. M. (1999). Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development. In L. M. Branscomb, F. Kodama, & R. Florida (Eds.), Industrializing knowledge: University–industry linkages in Japan and the United States (pp. 589–610). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Geiger, R. L., & Sá, C. M. (2008). Tapping the riches of science. Universities and the promise of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Geuna, A., & Martin, B. R. (2003). University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva, 41(4), 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibb, A. A., & Haskins, G. (2014). The university of the future: An entrepreneurial stakeholder learning institution? In A. Fayolle & D. T. Redford (Eds.), Handbook on the entrepreneurial university (pp. 25–63). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  23. Gordon, G., & Whitchurch, C. (Eds.). (2010). Academic and professional identities in higher education: The challenges of a diversifying workforce. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. (2011). University governance reforms, global scripts and the ‘nordic model’. Accounting for policy change? In J. Schmid, K. Amos, J. Schrader, & A. Thiel (Eds.), Welten der Bildung? Vergleichende Analysen von Bildungspolitik und Bildungssystemen (pp. 149–177). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guston, D. H. (2000). Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. HEInnovate (2014). The Entrepreneurial Higher Education Institution. A Review of the Concept and Its Relevance Today. Brussels: European Commission (mimeo).Google Scholar
  27. Jarzabkowski, P. (2002). Centralised or decentralised? Strategic implications of resource allocation models. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnstone, D. B. (2006). Financing higher education. Cost-sharing in international perspective. Boston: CIHE.Google Scholar
  29. Johnstone, D. B., & Marcucci, P. (2010). Financing higher education worldwide. Who pays? Who should pay? Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kinser, K., & Levy, D. C. (2006). For-profit higher education: U.S. tendencies, international echoes. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 107–119). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization. World society and organizational change (pp. 241–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kwiek, M. (2006). The university and the state. A study into global transformations. Frankfurt a. Main/New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  33. Kwiek, M. (2008a). Accessibility and equity, market forces and entrepreneurship: Developments in higher education in central and eastern Europe. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(1), 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kwiek, M. (2008b). Academic entrepreneurship vs. changing governance and institutional management structures at European universities. Policy Futures in Education, 6(6), 757–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kwiek, M. (2009a). Entrepreneurialism and private higher education in Europe. In M. Shattock (Ed.), Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy. Diversification and organisational change in European higher education (pp. 100–120). Maidenhead/New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kwiek, M. (2009b). Globalisation: Re-reading its impact on the nation-state, the university, and educational policies in Europe. In M. Simons, M. Olssen, & M. E. Peters (Eds.), Re-reading education policies. A handbook studying the policy agenda of the 21st century (pp. 195–215). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  37. Kwiek, M. (2009c). The changing attractiveness of European higher education: Current developments, future challenges, and major policy issues. In B. Kehm, J. Huisman, & B. Stensaker (Eds.), The European higher education area: Perspectives on a moving target (pp. 107–124). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  38. Kwiek, M. (2012). The growing complexity of the academic enterprise in Europe: A panoramic view. European Journal of Higher Education, 2(2–3), 112–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kwiek, M. (2013). Knowledge production in European universities. States, markets, and academic entrepreneurialism. Frankfurt/New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  40. Kwiek, M. (2015a). The internationalization of research in Europe. A quantitative study of 11 national systems from a micro-level perspective. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(1), 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kwiek, M. (2015b). Inequality in academic knowledge production. The role of research top performers across Europe. In E. Reale & E. Primeri (Eds.), Universities in transition. Shifting institutional and organizational boundaries (pp. 203–230). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kwiek, M. (2015c). The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries. Higher Education, 70(online first), 1–19.Google Scholar
  43. Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Research Policy, 40(10), 1354–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lundström, A., & Stevenson, L. A. (2005). Entrepreneurship policy: Theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  45. Maassen, P., & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.). (2007). University dynamics and European integration. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Mainardes, E. W., Raposo, M., & Alves, H. (2014). Universities need a market orientation to attract non-traditional stakeholders as new financing sources. Public Organization Review, 14(2), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marginson, S. (2000). Monash: Remaking the university. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  48. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university. Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Martin, B. R., & Etzkowitz, H. (2000). The origin and evolution of the university system. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series. No. 59. December.Google Scholar
  50. Mazza, C., Quattrone, P., & Riccaboni, A. (Eds.). (2008). European universities in transition: Issues, models and cases. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  51. Middlehurst, R. (2004). Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 258–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mora, J.-G., & Vieira, M.-J. (2009). Governance, organizational change, and entrepreneurialism: Is there a connection? In M. Shattock (Ed.), Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy: Diversification and organizational change in European higher education (pp. 74–99). Berkshire: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Mora, J.-G., Vieira, M.-J., & Detmer, A. (2012). Managing university-enterprise partnerships. In P. Temple (Ed.), Universities in the knowledge economy: Higher education organisation and global change (pp. 63–81). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Newson, J., & Buchbinder, H. (1998). The university means business. Toronto: Garamond Press.Google Scholar
  55. Newson, J., & Currie, J. (Eds.). (1998). Globalization and the university. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. OECD. (1998). Fostering entrepreneurship. The OECD jobs strategy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  57. OECD. (2014). Education at a glance. OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  58. Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2009). University governance. Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Pinheiro, R., & Stensaker, B. (2014). Designing the entrepreneurial university: The interpretation of a global idea. Public Organization Review, 14(4), 497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Powell, J., & Hendricks, J. (Eds.). (2009). The welfare state in post-industrial society. A global perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  61. Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30(3), 509–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship. University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  63. Shane, S. (2005). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. New horizons in entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  64. Sharma, R. (2004). Performance-based funding in the entrepreneurial North American and Australian universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(1), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shattock, M. (2000). Strategic management in European universities in an age of increasing institutional self-reliance. Tertiary Education and Management, 6(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shattock, M. (2003). Managing successful universities. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Shattock, M. (2004). Generating non-state income in European universities. In M. Shattock (Ed.), Entrepreneurialism and the transformation of Russian universities (pp. 221–235). Paris: UNESCO IIEP.Google Scholar
  68. Shattock, M. (2006). Managing good governance in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Shattock, M. (2009a). Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy. Diversification and organizational change in European higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press and SRHE.Google Scholar
  70. Shattock, M. (2009b). Entrepreneurialism and organizational change in higher education. In M. Shattock (Ed.), Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy: Diversification and organizational change in European higher education (pp. 1–8). Berkshire: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Shattock, M. (2010). The entrepreneurial university: An idea for its time. London Review of Education, 8(3), 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shattock, M., & Temple, P. (2006). Entrepreneurialism and the knowledge society: Some conclusions from cross-national studies. Paper presented at the EAIR Forum, Rome.Google Scholar
  73. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive university structures. An analysis of adaptations to socioeconomic environments of US and European universities. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  76. Sporn, B. (2001). Building adaptive universities: Emerging organisational forms based on experiences of European and US universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tanzi, V. (2011). Government versus market: The changing economic role of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Temple, P. (2009). Teaching and learning: An entrepreneurial perspective. In M. Shattock (Ed.), Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy: Diversification and organizational change in European higher education (pp. 49–73). Berkshire: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Tierney, W. G. (Ed.). (1998). The responsive university. Restructuring for high performance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Whitchurch, C. (2010). The challenges of a diversifying workforce. In G. Gordon & C. Whitchurch (Eds.), Academic and professional identities in higher education: The challenges of a diversifying workforce (pp. 245–255). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Whitley, R. (2010). Reconfiguring the public sciences. The impact of governance changes on authority and innovation in public science systems. In R. Whitley, J. Gläser, & L. Engwall (Eds.), Reconfiguring knowledge production. Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation (pp. 3–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Williams, G. (1992). Changing patterns of finance in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Williams, G. (2003). An honest living or dumping down? In G. Williams (Ed.), The enterprising university: Reform, excellence and equity (pp. 3–19). Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Williams, G. (2004a). The changing political economy of higher education. In M. Shattock (Ed.), Entrepreneurialism and the transformation of Russian universities (pp. 76–93). Paris: UNESCO IIEP.Google Scholar
  85. Williams, G. (Ed.). (2004b). The enterprising university. Reform, excellence and equity. London: Open University Press and SRHE.Google Scholar
  86. Williams, G. (2009). Finance and entrepreneurial activity in higher education in a knowledge society. In M. Shattock (Ed.), Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy: Diversification and organizational change in European higher education (pp. 8–32). Berkshire: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Ziman, J. (1994). Prometheus bound. Science in a dynamic steady-state. Cambridge: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNESCO Chair in Institutional Research and Higher Education PolicyUniversity of PoznanPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations