Skip to main content

Overcoming Barriers to Making Cities More Sustainable: How Can Short-Term Thinking Help Achieve Long-Term Goals?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 803 Accesses

Abstract

Cities are critical to addressing sustainable development: over 50 % of us live in cities; they consume 75 % of global resources, over two thirds of all energy and account for 70 % of global CO2 emissions. Cities have responded to this challenge with a large number committing to sustainable visions and/or initiatives such as the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group or ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability network. Whilst there are pockets of best practice, we are not seeing the speed or scale of change required in terms of resource use, carbon emissions or well-being. Cities are struggling to achieve long-term goals in the face of short-term pressures, capacities and practices such as budgeting, political cycles and procurement approaches. Rapid change and uncertainty, especially in technology, is also a challenge. This paper reviews the transition literature to identify and evaluate how transition theory can be used to understand and overcome this implementation gap. The findings show that the transition management model offers a promising approach but with significant weaknesses and gaps. However, these can be addressed by drawing on other theories and models of change. The paper concludes by proposing a new framework for change incorporating short-term processes, demand drivers and evaluation into the transition management model, and proposing areas for research.

Huxley, R. (2015) Overcoming barriers to making cities more sustainable: how can short-term thinking help achieve long-term goals? In; Gorse, C and Dastbaz, M (Eds.) International SEEDS Conference, 17–18 September 2015, Leeds Beckett University UK, Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arts, B., Leroy, P., & van Tatenhove, J. (2006). Political modernisation and policy arrangements: A framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public Organization Review, 6, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2004). Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 48–75). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future: Report of the 1987 world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the ‘Urban’ politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14, 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., Castan-Broto, V., Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). Cities and low carbon transitions. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • C40 (2013) http://www.c40cities.org/ending-climate-change-begins-in-the-city.

  • Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (1998). Towards sustainable city policy: An economy-environment technology nexus. Ecological Economics, 24, 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Cities (2013). Cities outlook 2013. Centre for Cities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterton, P. (2013). Towards an agenda for post-carbon cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK’s first ecological, affordable cohousing community. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 1654–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke E., Wilcox Z., & Nohrová N. (2013). Delivering change: How cities go low carbon while supporting economic growth. Centre for Cities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, I. R., & Swyngedouw, E. (2012). Cities, social cohesion and the environment: Towards a future research agenda. Urban Studies, 49, 1959–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Translation Project (2010). http://environmentaltranslation.org/The_Environmental_Translation_Project/Cities.html.

  • Foxon, T. J., (2011). A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 70, 2258–2267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F.W., (2005a). Co-evolution of technology and society: The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930)—A case study in multi-level perspective. Technology in Society, 27, 363–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F.W., (2005b). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17, 445–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., (2006). The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840–1930): The dynamics of regime transformation. Research Policy, 35, 1069–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39, 495–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2011). The role of cities in technological transitions: analytical clarifications and historical examples. Cities and low carbon transitions. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girardet, H. (1999). Creating sustainable cities. Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, S., & Marvin, S. (1999). Understanding sustainable cities: Competing Urban futures. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6, 268–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2009). World energy outlook 2008 http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2008-1994/WEO2008.pdf.

  • Istrate, E., & Nadeau, C. A. (2012). Global MetroMonitor 2012: Slowdown, recovery, and interdependence. The Brookings Institution. http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2012/11/30-global-metromonitor. Accessed 21 june 2014.

  • Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 14, 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, F. (2011). Ideas, institutions, and interests: explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability. Environment and Planning-Part C, 29(6), 1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, D. (2004). Governance and transitions. A multi-level policy framework based on complex systems thinking. Trabajo presentado en la Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. URL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach D., & Rotmans J. (2006). Managing transitions for sustainable development. In X. Olsthoorn, A. J. Wieczorek (Eds.) Understanding industrial transformation.Views from different disciplines. (pp. 187–206). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Erickson, T. A. (2014). Multiple pathways to sustainability in the city: The case of San Juan Puerto Rico. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., & Jennings, I. (2008). Cities as sustainable ecosystems: Principles and practices. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, S., & Cowell, R. (2002). Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauschmayer, F., Bauler, T., & Schäpke, N. (2015). Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions—Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices. Ecological Economics, 109, 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite, D., & Dodman, D. (2013). Towards resilience and transformation for cities within a finite planet. Environment and Urbanization, 25, 291–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Foundations for organizational science. London: A Sage Publication Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2014). The nature of cities: The scope and limits of Urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, n/a–n/a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing grassroots innovations:exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environment and planning-Part C, 30, 381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2010). Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy, 39, 471–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2010). The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecology and Society, 15, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2012). Department of economic and social affairs, population division. In World Urbanization prospects, the 2011 revision. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 275–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, M. (2003). (Re)Analysing the sustainable city: nature, urbanisation and the regulation of socio-environmental relations in the UK. Urban Studies, 40, 1183–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO & UNICEF (2011). Joint monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation [Online]. Available at:http://www.wssinfo.org/data-estimates/introduction/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Huxley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huxley, R. (2016). Overcoming Barriers to Making Cities More Sustainable: How Can Short-Term Thinking Help Achieve Long-Term Goals?. In: Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32645-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32646-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics