Abstract
Cities are critical to addressing sustainable development: over 50 % of us live in cities; they consume 75 % of global resources, over two thirds of all energy and account for 70 % of global CO2 emissions. Cities have responded to this challenge with a large number committing to sustainable visions and/or initiatives such as the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group or ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability network. Whilst there are pockets of best practice, we are not seeing the speed or scale of change required in terms of resource use, carbon emissions or well-being. Cities are struggling to achieve long-term goals in the face of short-term pressures, capacities and practices such as budgeting, political cycles and procurement approaches. Rapid change and uncertainty, especially in technology, is also a challenge. This paper reviews the transition literature to identify and evaluate how transition theory can be used to understand and overcome this implementation gap. The findings show that the transition management model offers a promising approach but with significant weaknesses and gaps. However, these can be addressed by drawing on other theories and models of change. The paper concludes by proposing a new framework for change incorporating short-term processes, demand drivers and evaluation into the transition management model, and proposing areas for research.
Huxley, R. (2015) Overcoming barriers to making cities more sustainable: how can short-term thinking help achieve long-term goals? In; Gorse, C and Dastbaz, M (Eds.) International SEEDS Conference, 17–18 September 2015, Leeds Beckett University UK, Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Arts, B., Leroy, P., & van Tatenhove, J. (2006). Political modernisation and policy arrangements: A framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public Organization Review, 6, 93–106.
Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2004). Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 48–75). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future: Report of the 1987 world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the ‘Urban’ politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14, 42–63.
Bulkeley, H., Castan-Broto, V., Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). Cities and low carbon transitions. Routledge.
C40 (2013) http://www.c40cities.org/ending-climate-change-begins-in-the-city.
Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (1998). Towards sustainable city policy: An economy-environment technology nexus. Ecological Economics, 24, 103–118.
Centre for Cities (2013). Cities outlook 2013. Centre for Cities.
Chatterton, P. (2013). Towards an agenda for post-carbon cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK’s first ecological, affordable cohousing community. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 1654–1674.
Clarke E., Wilcox Z., & Nohrová N. (2013). Delivering change: How cities go low carbon while supporting economic growth. Centre for Cities.
Cook, I. R., & Swyngedouw, E. (2012). Cities, social cohesion and the environment: Towards a future research agenda. Urban Studies, 49, 1959–1979.
Environmental Translation Project (2010). http://environmentaltranslation.org/The_Environmental_Translation_Project/Cities.html.
Foxon, T. J., (2011). A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 70, 2258–2267.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.
Geels, F.W., (2005a). Co-evolution of technology and society: The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930)—A case study in multi-level perspective. Technology in Society, 27, 363–397.
Geels, F.W., (2005b). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17, 445–476.
Geels, F. W., (2006). The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840–1930): The dynamics of regime transformation. Research Policy, 35, 1069–1082.
Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39, 495–510.
Geels, F. W. (2011). The role of cities in technological transitions: analytical clarifications and historical examples. Cities and low carbon transitions. Abingdon: Routledge.
Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417.
Girardet, H. (1999). Creating sustainable cities. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge.
Guy, S., & Marvin, S. (1999). Understanding sustainable cities: Competing Urban futures. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6, 268–275.
International Energy Agency (2009). World energy outlook 2008 http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2008-1994/WEO2008.pdf.
Istrate, E., & Nadeau, C. A. (2012). Global MetroMonitor 2012: Slowdown, recovery, and interdependence. The Brookings Institution. http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2012/11/30-global-metromonitor. Accessed 21 june 2014.
Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 14, 78–91.
Kern, F. (2011). Ideas, institutions, and interests: explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability. Environment and Planning-Part C, 29(6), 1117.
Loorbach, D. (2004). Governance and transitions. A multi-level policy framework based on complex systems thinking. Trabajo presentado en la Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. URL.
Loorbach D., & Rotmans J. (2006). Managing transitions for sustainable development. In X. Olsthoorn, A. J. Wieczorek (Eds.) Understanding industrial transformation.Views from different disciplines. (pp. 187–206). Dordrecht: Springer.
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955–967.
Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75.
Muñoz-Erickson, T. A. (2014). Multiple pathways to sustainability in the city: The case of San Juan Puerto Rico. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 2.
Newman, P., & Jennings, I. (2008). Cities as sustainable ecosystems: Principles and practices. Island Press.
Owens, S., & Cowell, R. (2002). Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process. London: Routledge.
Rauschmayer, F., Bauler, T., & Schäpke, N. (2015). Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions—Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices. Ecological Economics, 109, 211–221.
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3, 15–31.
Satterthwaite, D., & Dodman, D. (2013). Towards resilience and transformation for cities within a finite planet. Environment and Urbanization, 25, 291–298.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Foundations for organizational science. London: A Sage Publication Series.
Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2014). The nature of cities: The scope and limits of Urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, n/a–n/a.
Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing grassroots innovations:exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environment and planning-Part C, 30, 381.
Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2010). Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy, 39, 471–476.
Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2010). The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecology and Society, 15, 11.
Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510.
United Nations (2012). Department of economic and social affairs, population division. In World Urbanization prospects, the 2011 revision. New York.
Voss, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Voss, J. P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 275–302.
Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047.
Whitehead, M. (2003). (Re)Analysing the sustainable city: nature, urbanisation and the regulation of socio-environmental relations in the UK. Urban Studies, 40, 1183–1206.
WHO & UNICEF (2011). Joint monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation [Online]. Available at:http://www.wssinfo.org/data-estimates/introduction/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Huxley, R. (2016). Overcoming Barriers to Making Cities More Sustainable: How Can Short-Term Thinking Help Achieve Long-Term Goals?. In: Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32645-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32646-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)