Abstract
Building surveys of existing properties can be useful when considering thermal upgrade . One aspect of the performance gap, when thermally refurbishing an existing property, is a miscalculation of its performance prior to intervention. If better than expected and the performance following intervention is worse, then gains and pay-back periods will be unfavourably affected. Additionally, some individual aspects may be identified which preclude certain design decisions. To assess the performance there are four levels of inspection: a desktop assumption, a brief visual visit, a short condition assessment , and a full building survey with initial performance testing taking some hours or even days to determine actual construction and performance rather than theoretical. One prerequisite assumption for thermal upgrade design is that the property construction and condition is known to the extent of the fourth level of survey, whereas in practice, only a desktop assumption or brief visual inspection may have been made. Resources of time, money and size of estate are usually restricting factors on the level of survey undertaken. The requirements of an initial survey have been explored. This would determine where the construction, materials, and condition of the property may impact on its pre-works performance and where these may adversely affect its performance following the thermal improvement. Specific reference is made to moisture levels in the construction. Standard levels of survey are compared and assessed against the information required for effective thermal improvement. A protocol for an initial survey assessment of a property’s construction, condition and performance is offered.
Smith, M. (2015) Building surveys to inform assessment of initial conditions in a property prior to thermal upgrade In; Gorse, C and Dastbaz, M (Eds.) International SEEDS Conference, 17–18 September 2015, Leeds Beckett University UK, Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
BRE. (1991). Design of timber floors to prevent decay. BRE Digest 364. August 1991. Garston, Watford, UK: Building Research Establishment Ltd.
BRE. (1998). Repairing frost damage: walls. Good Repair Guide 20. Part 2. November 1998. Garston, Watford, UK: Building Research Establishment Ltd.
BRE. (2002). Ventilated and unventilated cold pitched roofs. Good Building Guide 51. Bracknall, UK: Building Research Establishment Ltd.
EHS. (2006). Repointing stone and brick. Technical Note no. 37. Environment and Heritage Service. Northern Ireland Environment Agency.
English Heritage. (2011). Energy efficiency and historic buildings: Application of part L of the building regulations to historic and traditionally constructed buildings. London, UK: English Heritage.
English Heritage. (2012). Energy efficiency and historic buildings: Insulating solid walls. London, UK: English Heritage.
English Heritage. (2015). Insulating solid walls. London, UK: English Heritage. http://www.climatechangeandyourhome.org.uk/live/insulating_solid_walls.aspx. Accessed 14 April 2015.
Historic Scotland. (2007). Conversion of traditional buildings part 1: Principles and practice. Technical conservation research and education group, Historic Scotland: Edinburgh, Scotland.
Ibstock. (2010). Technical information sheet 5: Durability. UK: Ibstock Brick Ltd.
Marshall, D., Worthing, D., Dann, N., & Heath, R. (2013). The construction of houses (5th ed.). UK: Routledge. EG Books.
Melville, I., & Gordon, I. (1973). The repair and maintenance of houses. London, UK: The Estates Gazette Limited.
RICS. (2004). Building surveys of residential property. RICS Guidance note (2nd ed.) London, UK: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
RICS. (2005). Stock condition surveys. RICS Guidance note (2nd ed.) London, UK: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
RICS. (2010). Building surveys and technical due diligence of commercial property. RICS Guidance note. Coventry, UK: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
RICS. (2013). Surveys of residential property. RICS Guidance note (3rd ed.). London, UK: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
Ridout, B. (2000). Timber decay in buildings: The conservation approach to treatment. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Stafford, A., Gorse, C., & Shao, L. (2011). The Retrofit Challenge: Delivering low carbon buildings. Revised publication ed. York, UK: The Centre for Low Carbon Futures Partnership in association with Energy Saving Trust.
STBA. (2012). Performance and energy efficiency of traditional buildings: Gap Analysis. Sustainable Traditional Buildings Alliance, CITB Construction Skills, and English Heritage.
STBA. (2014). Responsible retrofit guidance wheel. Sustainable Traditional Buildings Alliance. http://responsible-retrofit.org/wheel/. Accessed 14 April 2015.
Wingfield, J., Bell, M., Miles-Shenton, D. South, T. & Lowe, R. (2011). Evaluating the impact of an enhanced energy performance standard on load-bearing masonry domestic construction: Understanding the gap between designed and real performance: lessons from Stamford Brook. Centre for the Built Environment, Leeds Metropolitan University. Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, University College London. Department for Communities and Local Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smith, M. (2016). Building Surveys to Inform Assessment of Initial Conditions in a Property Prior to Thermal Upgrade. In: Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32645-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32646-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)